Diffusion-tensor fiber tractography: Intraindividual comparison of 3.0-T and 1.5-T MR imaging

被引:68
|
作者
Okada, T
Miki, Y
Fushimi, Y
Hanakawa, T
Kanagaki, M
Yamamoto, A
Urayama, S
Fukuyama, H
Hiraoka, M
Togashi, K
机构
[1] Kyoto Univ, Dept Diagnost Imaging & Nucl Med, Sakyo Ku, Kyoto 6068507, Japan
[2] Kyoto Univ, Dept Therapeut Radiol & Oncol, Sakyo Ku, Kyoto 6068507, Japan
[3] Kyoto Univ, Grad Sch Med, Sakyo Ku, Kyoto 6068507, Japan
[4] Kyoto Univ, Human Brain Res Ctr, Sakyo Ku, Kyoto 6068507, Japan
关键词
D O I
10.1148/radiol.2382042192
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To prospectively evaluate the depiction of brain fiber tracts at 3.0- versus 1.5-T diffusion-tensor (DT) fiber tractography performed with parallel imaging. Materials and Methods: Institutional review board approval was obtained, and each subject provided written informed consent. Subjects were 30 healthy volunteers (15 men, 15 women; mean age, 28 years; age range, 21-46 years). Single-shot spin-echo echo-planar magnetic resonance (MR) sequences with parallel imaging were applied. Four fiber tracts were reconstructed: corticospinal tract (CST), superior longitudinal fasciculus (SLF), corpus callosum (CC), and fornix. Two neuroradiologists compared 3.0- and 1.5-T tractography in terms of fiber tract depiction by using five depiction scores (scores 0-4) and numbers of reconstructed tract fibers and in terms of lateral asymmetry in the CST by using numbers of reconstructed fibers. The Wilcoxon signed rank test was applied for statistical analysis. Results: Visual scores for both CST hemispheres (P < .001), the right SLIT (P = .005), the CC (P = .01), and the right fornix (P = .04) were higher at 3.0-T DT tractography. Larger numbers of CST (right, P = .008; left, P < .001), SLF (right, P = .001; left, P = .02), and fornix (bilaterally, P = .02) tract fibers were depicted at 3.0 T. The asymmetry index for the CST was lower (P < .001) at 3.0 T. Visual scores for the left SLF and the left fornix and numbers of CC tract fibers were not significantly different. Conclusion: Depiction of most fiber tracts was improved at 3.0-T DT tractography compared with depiction at 1.5-T tractography. (c) RSNA, 2006.
引用
收藏
页码:668 / 678
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Multicenter Reproducibility of Liver Iron Quantification with 1.5-T and 3.0-T MRI
    Hernando, Diego
    Zhao, Ruiyang
    Yuan, Qing
    Ghasabeh, Mounes Aliyari
    Ruschke, Stefan
    Miao, Xinran
    Karampinos, Dimitrios C.
    Mao, Lu
    Harris, David T.
    Mattison, Ryan J.
    Jeng, Michael R.
    Pedrosa, Ivan
    Kamel, Ihab R.
    Vasanawala, Shreyas
    Yokoo, Takeshi
    Reeder, Scott B.
    RADIOLOGY, 2023, 306 (02)
  • [22] Comparison of diffusion tensor imaging measurements at 3.0 T versus 1.5 T with and without parallel Imaging
    Alexander, AL
    Lee, JE
    Wu, YC
    Field, AS
    NEUROIMAGING CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2006, 16 (02) : 299 - +
  • [23] Comparison of 1.5-and 3.0-T MR Imaging for Evaluating the Articular Cartilage of the Knee Joint
    Kijowski, Richard
    Blankenbaker, Donna G.
    Davis, Kirkland W.
    Shinki, Kazuhiko
    Kaplan, Lee D.
    De Smet, Arthur A.
    RADIOLOGY, 2009, 250 (03) : 839 - 848
  • [24] Detection of hepatic metastases by superparamagnetic iron oxide-enhanced MR imaging: prospective comparison between 1.5-T and 3.0-T images in the same patients
    Keitaro Sofue
    Masakatsu Tsurusaki
    Mototaka Miyake
    Aine Sakurada
    Yasuaki Arai
    Kazuro Sugimura
    European Radiology, 2010, 20 : 2265 - 2273
  • [25] MR IMAGING OF THE LARYNX AT 1.5-T
    SAKAI, F
    GAMSU, G
    DILLON, WP
    LYNCH, DA
    GILBERT, TJ
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 1990, 14 (01) : 60 - 71
  • [26] Detection of hepatic metastases by superparamagnetic iron oxide-enhanced MR imaging: prospective comparison between 1.5-T and 3.0-T images in the same patients
    Sofue, Keitaro
    Tsurusaki, Masakatsu
    Miyake, Mototaka
    Sakurada, Aine
    Arai, Yasuaki
    Sugimura, Kazuro
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2010, 20 (09) : 2265 - 2273
  • [27] Diffusion Tensor Imaging and Fiber Tractography of Skeletal Muscle: Optimization of b Value for Imaging at 1.5 T
    Saupe, Nadja
    White, Lawrence M.
    Stainsby, Jeffrey
    Tomlinson, George
    Sussman, Marshall S.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2009, 192 (06) : W282 - W290
  • [28] Improved image quality of intracranial aneurysms: 3.0-T versus 1.5-T time-of-flight MR angiography
    Gibbs, GF
    Huston, J
    Bernstein, MA
    Riederer, SJ
    Brown, RD
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEURORADIOLOGY, 2004, 25 (01) : 84 - 87
  • [29] Effect of 1.5-T and 3.0-T magnetic resonance imaging on the ceramic adhesion and physical properties of prosthetic substructures
    Baysal, Nurten
    Ayyildiz, Simel
    Orujalipoor, Ilghar
    Erol, Baris Filiz
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2020, 124 (06): : 809.e1 - 809.e7
  • [30] Peripheral Arterial Occlusive Disease: 3.0-T versus 1.5-T MR Angiography Compared with Digital Subtraction Angiography
    van den Bosch, Harrie C. M.
    Westenberg, Jos J. M.
    Caris, Ralph
    Duijm, Lucien E. M.
    Tielbeek, Alexander V.
    Cuypers, Philip W. M.
    de Roos, Albert
    RADIOLOGY, 2013, 266 (01) : 337 - 346