Post-project reviews as a key project management competence

被引:84
|
作者
Anbari, Frank T. [1 ]
Carayannis, Elias G. [2 ,3 ]
Voetsch, Robert James
机构
[1] Sch Business, Dept Decis Sci, Washington, DC USA
[2] Sch Business, Dept Informat Syst & Technol Management, Washington, DC USA
[3] George Washington Univ, Washington, DC 20052 USA
关键词
project management; knowledge management; post-project evaluation; lessons learned; project learning cycle; project success; project failure;
D O I
10.1016/j.technovation.2007.12.001
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
There is a general belief that post-project reviews are beneficial. However, such reviews are not conducted in a consistent manner, if at all, in many organizations. Therefore, there is a need to discuss post-project reviews as part of effective project management. This paper explores the nexus of knowledge management and project management. It addresses the role of post-project reviews and their impact on the success of future projects, improvement of the overall performance of the organization and its long-term competitive position, and development of its learning processes. It discusses critical aspects and useful techniques in the implementation of post-project reviews. The data gathered from post-project reviews provide the historical database from which future project teams can develop meaningful project plans based on their organization's project learning cycle. This database can provide project managers and teams with the information they need on specific staff skill set needs, and the profile of the customer and operating environment that can impact the ultimate success of projects and project management. The paper discusses where post-project reviews fit into the project life cycle and project management processes. It assesses how such reviews can assist an organization in improving the manner in which its projects are conceived, planned, implemented, reported, and evaluated. (C) 2008 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:633 / 643
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Construction of model for post-project profit evaluation of agricultural land consolidation
    Sun, Yan
    Fu, Guanghui
    Zhao, Xiaomin
    Liu, Youzhao
    Nongye Gongcheng Xuebao/Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2008, 24 (01): : 129 - 134
  • [32] Forms of innovation inspired by open educational resources: a post-project analysis
    Coughlan, Tim
    Pitt, Rebecca
    Farrow, Robert
    OPEN LEARNING, 2019, 34 (02): : 156 - 175
  • [33] ARTIFICIAL STEPS TO STABILIZE MOUNTAIN RIVERS: A POST-PROJECT ECOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT
    Comiti, F.
    Mao, L.
    Lenzi, M. A.
    Siligardi, M.
    RIVER RESEARCH AND APPLICATIONS, 2009, 25 (05) : 639 - 659
  • [34] Lessons Learned and Post-Project Activities with Embedded Engineering Learning Platform
    Kastelan, Ivan
    Temerinac, Miodrag
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2017 IEEE GLOBAL ENGINEERING EDUCATION CONFERENCE (EDUCON2017), 2017, : 1125 - 1128
  • [35] Project management competence: Building key skills for individuals, teams, and organizations.
    Adler, S
    PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 53 (03) : 778 - 780
  • [36] Study of Intelligent Integrated Modeling and Development of Agricultural Post-Project Evaluation
    Li, Chen
    COMPUTER AND COMPUTING TECHNOLOGIES IN AGRICULTURE IV, PT 3, 2011, 346 : 549 - 553
  • [37] The contingent effects on project performance of conducting project reviews and deploying project management offices
    Liu, Li
    Yetton, Philip
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 2007, 54 (04) : 789 - 799
  • [38] A comparative study of stress between pre- and post-Project 2000 students
    Lindop, E
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 1999, 29 (04) : 967 - 973
  • [39] Post-project review of environmental impact assessment for Saguling Dam for involuntary resettlement
    Faculty of Agriculture, Utsunomiya University, 350 Mine-machi, Utsunomiya, Tochigi 321, Japan
    Int. J. Water Resour. Dev., 2 (217-229):
  • [40] Tackling Project Management Competence Research
    Nijhuis, Steven
    Vrijhoef, Ruben
    Kessels, Joseph
    PROJECT MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2018, 49 (03) : 62 - 81