Transaction costs and trade liberalization: An empirical perspective from the MERCOSUR agreement

被引:2
|
作者
Valdes, Rodrigo [1 ,2 ]
Von Cramon-Taubadel, Stephan [1 ,2 ]
Engler, Alejandra [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Gottingen, Dept Agr Econ & Rural Dev, D-37073 Gottingen, Germany
[2] Univ Talca, Fac Ciencias Agr, Dept Econ Agr, Talca, Chile
关键词
Market integration; Transaction costs; Threshold vector error correction model; Brazil; Argentina; United States; PRICE TRANSMISSION; MARKET INTEGRATION; COINTEGRATION; ARBITRAGE; WHEAT;
D O I
10.1016/j.foodpol.2015.06.005
中图分类号
F3 [农业经济];
学科分类号
0202 ; 020205 ; 1203 ;
摘要
Studies investigating the effect of trade liberalization policies on transaction costs in agricultural markets are scarce. The objective of our paper is to determine whether Brazil became more integrated with reduced transaction costs after the introduction of MERCOSUR with respect to its main agricultural trade partners, Argentina (a MERCOSUR member) and the United States (a non-MERCOSUR member). Using a threshold vector error correction model (TVECM), we estimate the transaction cost, price transmission elasticity and half-life adjustments for the most traded agricultural products between Brazil/Argentina and Brazil/United States from January 1980 to December 2012. Our findings suggest a strong MERCOSUR effect, with lower transaction costs and higher price transmission elasticity when compared to a non-agreement scenario. Moreover, the variations of both parameters are highly heterogeneous across products, depending mainly on their degree of differentiation. From a policy perspective, elements such as the sources of comparative and competitive advantages together with investment policies, specific market regulations and agricultural subsidies, among others, are mainly what influence the extent of transaction cost and market integration. Our results show that Brazil has made progress but still has considerable room for improvement in reducing barriers to agricultural products and, as a consequence, to achieving the full benefits of the MERCOSUR agreement. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:109 / 116
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] EU-Mercosur trade agreement on horizon
    Nuthall, Keith
    [J]. Knitting International, 2023, (02): : 12 - 13
  • [2] SUNK COSTS AND TRADE LIBERALIZATION
    MOTTA, M
    [J]. ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 1992, 102 (412): : 578 - 587
  • [3] Microfinance from the Clients' Perspective: An Empirical Enquiry into Transaction Costs in Urban and Rural India
    Dehem, Thibaut
    Hudon, Marek
    [J]. OXFORD DEVELOPMENT STUDIES, 2013, 41 : S117 - S132
  • [4] The European Union and MERCOSUR: Prospects for a free trade agreement
    Bulmer-Thomas, V
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERAMERICAN STUDIES AND WORLD AFFAIRS, 2000, 42 (01): : 1 - +
  • [5] Rising trade costs? Agglomeration and trade with endogenous transaction costs
    Duranton, Gilles
    Storper, Michael
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS-REVUE CANADIENNE D ECONOMIQUE, 2008, 41 (01): : 292 - 319
  • [6] Joining an existing regional trade agreement from the perspective of a small open economy: Chile's accession to NAFTA and MERCOSUR
    Valdes, A
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1995, 77 (05) : 1292 - 1297
  • [7] THE IMPACT OF TRANSACTION COSTS ON THE DIRECTION OF TRADE - EMPIRICAL-EVIDENCE FOR ASIA PACIFIC
    AMELUNG, T
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INSTITUTIONAL AND THEORETICAL ECONOMICS-ZEITSCHRIFT FUR DIE GESAMTE STAATSWISSENSCHAFT, 1991, 147 (04): : 716 - 732
  • [8] Switching costs and the impact of trade liberalization
    Kikuchi, Toru
    [J]. ECONOMICS BULLETIN, 2007, 6
  • [9] Adjustment costs and gradual trade liberalization
    Furusawa, T
    Lai, ELC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, 1999, 49 (02) : 333 - 361
  • [10] Dynamic Amazonia: The EU-Mercosur Trade Agreement and Deforestation
    Arima, Eugenio
    Barreto, Paulo
    Taheripour, Farzad
    Aguiar, Angel
    [J]. LAND, 2021, 10 (11)