Effects of Resistance Training Frequency on Measures of Muscle Hypertrophy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:157
|
作者
Schoenfeld, Brad J. [1 ]
Ogborn, Dan [2 ]
Krieger, James W. [3 ]
机构
[1] Lehman Coll, Dept Hlth Sci, Bronx, NY 10468 USA
[2] McMaster Univ, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[3] Weightology LLC, Issaquah, WA USA
关键词
ROBUST VARIANCE-ESTIMATION; BODY-COMPOSITION; MUSCULAR ADAPTATIONS; STRENGTH; VOLUME; EXERCISE; SIZE; INTENSITY; ROUTINES; WHOLE;
D O I
10.1007/s40279-016-0543-8
中图分类号
G8 [体育];
学科分类号
04 ; 0403 ;
摘要
Background A number of resistance training (RT) program variables can be manipulated to maximize muscular hypertrophy. One variable of primary interest in this regard is RT frequency. Frequency can refer to the number of resistance training sessions performed in a given period of time, as well as to the number of times a specific muscle group is trained over a given period of time. Objective We conducted a systematic review and metaanalysis to determine the effects of resistance training frequency on hypertrophic outcomes. Methods Studies were deemed eligible for inclusion if they met the following criteria: (1) were an experimental trial published in an English-language refereed journal; (2) directly compared different weekly resistance training frequencies in traditional dynamic exercise using coupled concentric and eccentric actions; (3) measured morphologic changes via biopsy, imaging, circumference, and/or densitometry; (4) had a minimum duration of 4 weeks; and (5) used human participants without chronic disease or injury. A total of ten studies were identified that investigated RT frequency in accordance with the criteria outlined. Results Analysis using binary frequency as a predictor variable revealed a significant impact of training frequency on hypertrophy effect size (P = 0.002), with higher frequency being associated with a greater effect size than lower frequency (0.49 +/- 0.08 vs. 0.30 +/- 0.07, respectively). Statistical analyses of studies investigating training session frequency when groups are matched for frequency of training per muscle group could not be carried out and reliable estimates could not be generated due to inadequate sample size. Conclusions When comparing studies that investigated training muscle groups between 1 to 3 days per week on a volume-equated basis, the current body of evidence indicates that frequencies of training twice a week promote superior hypertrophic outcomes to once a week. It can therefore be inferred that the major muscle groups should be trained at least twice a week to maximize muscle growth; whether training a muscle group three times per week is superior to a twice-per-week protocol remains to be determined.
引用
收藏
页码:1689 / 1697
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Effects of Resistance Training to Muscle Failure on Acute Fatigue: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    João Guilherme Vieira
    Amanda Veiga Sardeli
    Marcelo Ricardo Dias
    José Elias Filho
    Yuri Campos
    Leandro Sant’Ana
    Luis Leitão
    Victor Reis
    Michal Wilk
    Jefferson Novaes
    Jeferson Vianna
    [J]. Sports Medicine, 2022, 52 : 1103 - 1125
  • [22] Effects of resistance training on muscle strength in adults with haemophilia: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Nunez-Cortes, Rodrigo
    Perez-Alenda, Sofia
    Calatayud, Joaquin
    Soto, Veronica
    Pinto, Ronei S.
    Andersen, Lars Louis
    Cruz-Montecinos, Carlos
    [J]. HAEMOPHILIA, 2024, 30 (04) : 894 - 904
  • [23] Moderators of strength gains and hypertrophy in resistance training: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Polito, Marcos D.
    Papst, Rafael R.
    Farinatti, Paulo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SPORTS SCIENCES, 2021, 39 (19) : 2189 - 2198
  • [24] How many times per week should a muscle be trained to maximize muscle hypertrophy? A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies examining the effects of resistance training frequency
    Schoenfeld, Brad Jon
    Grgic, Jozo
    Krieger, James
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SPORTS SCIENCES, 2019, 37 (11) : 1286 - 1295
  • [25] Author Correction: Efficacy of resistance training in hypoxia on muscle hypertrophy and strength development: a systematic review with meta-analysis
    Cristina Benavente
    Brad J. Schoenfeld
    Paulino Padial
    Belén Feriche
    [J]. Scientific Reports, 13 (1)
  • [26] Influence of resistance training load on measures of skeletal muscle hypertrophy and improvements in maximal strength and neuromuscular task performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Refalo, Martin C.
    Hamilton, D. Lee
    Paval, D. Robert
    Gallagher, Iain J.
    Feros, Simon A.
    Fyfe, Jackson J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SPORTS SCIENCES, 2021, 39 (15) : 1723 - 1745
  • [27] The effects of resistance training on muscular strength and hypertrophy in elderly cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Lee, Junghoon
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SPORT AND HEALTH SCIENCE, 2022, 11 (02) : 194 - 201
  • [28] Comparison of Traditional and Advanced Resistance Training Paradigms on Muscle Hypertrophy in Trained Individuals: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Fonseca, Pedro A. B.
    Ide, Bernardo N.
    Oranchuk, Dustin J.
    Marocolo, Moacir
    Simim, Mario A. M.
    Roberts, Michael D.
    Mota, Gustavo R.
    [J]. TRANSLATIONAL SPORTS MEDICINE, 2023, 2023
  • [29] Resistance training prescription for muscle strength and hypertrophy in healthy adults: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis
    Currier, Brad S.
    Mcleod, Jonathan C.
    Banfield, Laura
    Beyene, Joseph
    Welton, Nicky J.
    D'Souza, Alysha C.
    Keogh, Joshua A. J.
    Lin, Lydia
    Coletta, Giulia
    Yang, Antony
    Colenso-Semple, Lauren
    Lau, Kyle J.
    Verboom, Alexandria
    Phillips, Stuart M.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2023, 57 (18)
  • [30] Comment on “Influence of Resistance Training Proximity-to-Failure on Skeletal Muscle Hypertrophy: A Systematic Review with Meta-analysis”
    Pedro A. B. Fonseca
    Bernardo N. Ide
    Eric Pascher
    Gustavo R. Mota
    [J]. Sports Medicine, 2024, 54 (2) : 535 - 536