The effect of combined transcranial direct current stimulation and peripheral nerve electrical stimulation on corticospinal excitability

被引:4
|
作者
Tsuiki, Shota [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Sasaki, Ryoki [1 ,2 ]
Miyaguchi, Shota [2 ]
Kojima, Sho [2 ]
Saito, Kei [2 ]
Inukai, Yasuto [2 ]
Masaki, Mitsuhiro [2 ]
Otsuru, Naofumi [2 ]
Onishi, Hideaki [2 ]
机构
[1] Niigata Univ Hlth & Welf, Grad Sch, Niigata, Japan
[2] Niigata Univ Hlth & Welf, Inst Human Movement & Med Sci, Niigata, Japan
[3] Tochigi Med Assoc, Rehabil Ctr, Shiobara Hot Spring Hosp, Nasushiobara, Tochigi, Japan
来源
PLOS ONE | 2019年 / 14卷 / 03期
基金
日本学术振兴会;
关键词
HUMAN MOTOR CORTEX; MAGNETIC STIMULATION; CORTICOMOTOR EXCITABILITY; MODULATION; PLASTICITY; DC; VARIABILITY; MECHANISMS; PARAMETERS; TASK;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0214592
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and peripheral nerve electrical stimulation (PES) can change corticospinal excitability. tDCS can be used to non-invasively modulate the cerebral cortex's excitability by applying weak current to an electrode attached to the head, and the effect varies with the electrode's polarity. Previous studies have reported the effect of combined tDCS and PES on corticospinal excitability; when compared to single stimulation, combined stimulation increases cortical excitability. In contrast, another study reported that the effect of tDCS is attenuated by PES; hence, there is no consensus opinion on the effect on combined stimulation. Therefore, this study aimed to clarify the effect of combined tDCS and PES on corticospinal excitability. In Experiment 1, the combined stimulation of anodal tDCS and PES (anodal tDCS + PES) was performed, and in Experiment 2, a combined stimulation with PES, after cathodal tDCS (PES after cathodal tDCS), was performed using a homeostatic metaplasticity theoretical model. In Experiment 1, anodal tDCS produced a significant increase from baseline in motor-evoked potential (MEP) amplitude 10 min after stimulation, but no significant changes in MEP amplitude were observed with PES or the anodal tDCS + PES condition. Experiment 2 showed a significant decrease in MEP amplitude immediately after cathodal tDCS, and a significant increase in MEP amplitude 15 min after PES, but no significant change in MEP amplitude was observed with sequential PES following cathodal tDCS. In conclusion, our data indicate that PES with anodal tDCS suppressed the effect of tDCS. Also, PES after cathodal tDCS did not induce homeostatic metaplasticity and increase corticospinal excitability.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation modulates the effect of cerebellar transcranial magnetic stimulation on the excitability of spinal reflex
    Matsugi, Akiyoshi
    Okada, Yohei
    NEUROSCIENCE RESEARCH, 2020, 150 : 37 - 43
  • [22] The Effect of Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Quadriceps Maximal Voluntary Contraction, Corticospinal Excitability, and Voluntary Activation Levels
    Kristiansen, Mathias
    Thomsen, Mikkel Jacobi
    Norgaard, Jens
    Aaes, Jon
    Knudsen, Dennis
    Voigt, Michael
    JOURNAL OF STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING RESEARCH, 2022, 36 (06) : 1540 - 1547
  • [23] Non-linear changes to corticospinal excitability induced with increasing intensities of transcranial direct current stimulation
    Tang, Alexander D.
    Iyer, Kartik K.
    Vallence, Ann-Maree
    Fujiyama, Hakuei
    JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 2017, 595 (05): : 1445 - 1446
  • [24] Changes in Corticospinal Excitability and Motor Control During Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Healthy Individuals
    Takano, Keita
    Katagiri, Natsuki
    Sato, Takatsugu
    Jin, Masafumi
    Koseki, Tadaki
    Kudo, Daisuke
    Yoshida, Kaito
    Tanabe, Shigeo
    Tsujikawa, Masahiro
    Kondo, Kunitsugu
    Yamaguchi, Tomofumi
    CEREBELLUM, 2023, 22 (05): : 905 - 914
  • [25] Transcranial direct-current stimulation reduced the excitability of diaphragmatic corticospinal pathways whatever the polarity used
    Azabou, Eric
    Roche, Nicolas
    Sharshar, Tarek
    Bussel, Bernard
    Lofaso, Frederic
    Petitjean, Michel
    RESPIRATORY PHYSIOLOGY & NEUROBIOLOGY, 2013, 189 (01) : 183 - 187
  • [26] Intensity Dependent Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Corticospinal Excitability in Chronic Spinal Cord Injury
    Murray, Lynda M.
    Edwards, Dylan J.
    Ruffini, Giulio
    Labar, Douglas
    Stampas, Argyrios
    Pascual-Leone, Alvaro
    Cortes, Mar
    ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2015, 96 (04): : S114 - S121
  • [27] Changes in Corticospinal Excitability and Motor Control During Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Healthy Individuals
    Keita Takano
    Natsuki Katagiri
    Takatsugu Sato
    Masafumi Jin
    Tadaki Koseki
    Daisuke Kudo
    Kaito Yoshida
    Shigeo Tanabe
    Masahiro Tsujikawa
    Kunitsugu Kondo
    Tomofumi Yamaguchi
    The Cerebellum, 2023, 22 : 905 - 914
  • [28] Unihemispheric concurrent dual-site cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation: the effects on corticospinal excitability
    Vaseghi, Bita
    Zoghi, Maryam
    Jaberzadeh, Shapour
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2016, 43 (09) : 1161 - 1172
  • [29] Time course of changes in corticospinal excitability induced by motor imagery during action observation combined with peripheral nerve electrical stimulation
    Takahito Yasui
    Tomofumi Yamaguchi
    Shigeo Tanabe
    Tsuyoshi Tatemoto
    Yoko Takahashi
    Kunitsugu Kondo
    Michiyuki Kawakami
    Experimental Brain Research, 2019, 237 : 637 - 645
  • [30] Time course of changes in corticospinal excitability induced by motor imagery during action observation combined with peripheral nerve electrical stimulation
    Yasui, Takahito
    Yamaguchi, Tomofumi
    Tanabe, Shigeo
    Tatemoto, Tsuyoshi
    Takahashi, Yoko
    Kondo, Kunitsugu
    Kawakami, Michiyuki
    EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2019, 237 (03) : 637 - 645