Replacing coal-fired power plants by photovoltaics in the Portuguese electricity system

被引:31
|
作者
Figueiredo, Raquel [1 ]
Nunes, Pedro [1 ]
Meireles, Monica [2 ,3 ]
Madaleno, Mara [4 ]
Brito, Miguel C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lisbon, Fac Ciencias, Inst Dom Luiz, P-1749016 Lisbon, Portugal
[2] Lisbon Univ Inst, ISCTE Business Sch, Dept Econ, Av Forcas Armadas, P-1649026 Lisbon, Portugal
[3] Lisbon Univ Inst, IUL, BRU, ISCTE, Av Forcas Armadas, P-1649026 Lisbon, Portugal
[4] Univ Aveiro, GOVCOPP, Res Unit Governance Competitiveness & Publ Polici, Dept Econ Management Ind Engn & Tourism,DEGEIT, Campus Univ Santiago, P-3810193 Aveiro, Portugal
关键词
Coal phase-out; Photovoltaics; Energy storage; Electricity systems; Renewable energy;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.217
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The decarbonization of the Portuguese electricity system, currently around 50% renewable-based, is undergoing with the commitment to reach 60% of renewable electricity share by 2020. Because of this, the phase-out of the two remaining coal-fired power plants has been receiving close attention, as they currently contribute to about one-fifth of the total electricity generation and two-thirds of the CO2 emissions in the power sector. This work assesses the impact of eliminating coal-fired generation from the Portuguese electricity system without replacing it, and explores a cleaner supply alternative achievable before 2025. Coal phase-out without substitution results in slightly increased CO2 emissions for the atmosphere if one assumes that the required additional imports are of carbon-intensive electricity, leading to the need of adding clean power capacity to the system. It is shown that coal plants could be replaced by about 8 GW of photovoltaics if accompanied by a modest increase in the already existing hydro pump capacity. In this case, the renewable electricity share increases to 77%, and carbon footprint decreases by 56%. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:129 / 142
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Coal-Fired Power Plants
    Peter Pauls
    [J]. 热力透平, 2004, (02) : 105 - 107
  • [2] The changes in coal intensity of electricity generation in Chinese coal-fired power plants
    Wang, Chunhua
    Cao, Xiaoyong
    Mao, Jie
    Qin, Ping
    [J]. ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2019, 80 : 491 - 501
  • [3] Efficiency and environmental impacts of electricity restructuring on coal-fired power plants
    Chan, H. Ron
    Fell, Harrison
    Lange, Ian
    Li, Shanjun
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2017, 81 : 1 - 18
  • [4] The Impact of Electricity Sector Restructuring on Coal-fired Power Plants in India
    Malik, Kabir
    Cropper, Maureen
    Limonov, Alexander
    Singh, Anoop
    [J]. ENERGY JOURNAL, 2015, 36 (04): : 287 - 312
  • [5] Coal-Fired Power Plants Alternative Petcoke Fired Power Plants
    Ozcelik, Ozlem
    Boran, Kurtulus
    [J]. JOURNAL OF POLYTECHNIC-POLITEKNIK DERGISI, 2016, 19 (04): : 531 - 535
  • [6] Tribology in coal-fired power plants
    Moumakwa, DO
    Marcus, K
    [J]. TRIBOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 2005, 38 (09) : 805 - 811
  • [7] Future coal-fired power plants
    Pruschek, R
    [J]. BWK, 2001, 53 (12): : 40 - +
  • [8] Modern coal-fired power plants
    Scheffknecht, G
    Stamatelopoulos, GN
    Lorey, H
    [J]. BWK, 2002, 54 (06): : 46 - +
  • [9] Advanced coal-fired power plants
    Ruth, LA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESOURCES TECHNOLOGY-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2001, 123 (01): : 4 - 9
  • [10] Research and design of coal PLC control system in coal-fired power plants
    [J]. Yin, Yuheng (Yinyh2009@163.com), 1600, Science and Engineering Research Support Society (10):