Comparison of survival outcomes between minimally invasive surgery and conventional open surgery for radical hysterectomy as primary treatment in patients with stage IB1-IIA2 cervical cancer

被引:114
|
作者
Kim, Se Ik [1 ]
Cho, Jae Hyun [1 ]
Seol, Aeran [1 ]
Kim, Young Im [1 ]
Lee, Maria [1 ]
Kim, Hee Seung [1 ]
Chung, Hyun Hoon [1 ]
Kim, Jae-Weon [1 ]
Park, Noh Hyun [1 ]
Song, Yong-Sang [1 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, 101 Daehak Ro, Seoul 03080, South Korea
关键词
Cervical cancer; Radical hysterectomy; Minimally invasive surgery; Laparoscopic surgery; Survival outcome; IB1; STATISTICS; RECURRENCE; CRITERIA; SOCIETY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.01.008
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective. To compare survival outcomes of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) and conventional open surgery for radical hysterectomy (RH) among patients with early-stage cervical cancer (CC). Methods. We retrospectively identified stage IB1-IIA2 CC patients who underwent either laparoscopic or open Type C RH between 2000 and 2018. Patients' clinicopathologic characteristics and survival outcomes were compared according to the surgical approach. For a more robust statistical analysis, we narrowed the study population down to the patients with stage IB1 who underwent pre-operative MRI. Results. In total, 435 and 158 patients were assigned to open surgery and MIS groups, respectively. MIS group had significantly less parametrial invasion (6.3% vs. 15.4%; P = 0.004). Despite similar proportions of patients received adjuvant treatment, concurrent chemoradiation therapy was performed less frequently in MIS group. After a median follow up of 114.8 months, the groups showed similar overall survival; however, MIS group displayed poorer progression-free survival (PFS; 5-year rate, 78.5% vs. 89.7%; P < 0.001). Multivariate analyses identified MIS as an independent poor prognostic factor for PFS (adjusted HR, 2.883; 95% CI, 1.711-4.859; P < 0.001). Consistent results were observed among 349 patients with stage 181: MIS was associated with higher recurrence rates (adjusted HR, 2.276; 95% CI, 1.039-4.986; P = 0.040). However, MIS did not influence PFS of stage IBI patients with cervical mass size <= 2 cm on pre-operative MRI (adjusted HR, 1.146; 95% CI, 0.278-4.724; P = 0.850). Conclusions. Overall, MIS RH was associated with higher recurrence rates than open RH in patients with earlystage CC. However, MIS was not a poor prognostic factor among those with stage IB1 and cervical mass size <= 2 cm on pre-operative MRI. (C) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:3 / 12
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Assessment of primary radical hysterectomy and neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical hysterectomy in Stage IB2, IIA bulky cervical cancer
    Musaev, A.
    Gazel, A. B.
    Khatib, G.
    Gulec, U. K.
    Vardar, M. A.
    Altmtas, A.
    Gumurdulu, D.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GYNAECOLOGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 36 (05) : 579 - 584
  • [32] Survival outcomes of minimally invasive versus open radical hysterectomy for low-risk, early-stage cervical cancer
    Summers, Garth
    Tierney, Brent
    Crotzer, David
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2020, 149 (03) : 380 - 381
  • [33] Comparative study of neoadjuvant chemotherapy before radical hysterectomy and radical surgery alone in stage IB2-IIA bulky cervical cancer
    Cho, Yun-Hyun
    Kim, Dae-Yeon
    Kim, Jong-Hyeok
    Kim, Yong-Man
    Kim, Young-Tak
    Nam, Joo-Hyun
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2009, 20 (01) : 22 - 27
  • [34] Comparison of Prognosis between Minimally Invasive and Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Patients with Early-Stage Cervical Cancer
    Tanaka, Tomohito
    Ueda, Shoko
    Miyamoto, Shunsuke
    Hashida, Sousuke
    Terada, Shinichi
    Konishi, Hiromi
    Kogata, Yuhei
    Taniguchi, Kohei
    Komura, Kazumasa
    Ohmichi, Masahide
    [J]. CURRENT ONCOLOGY, 2022, 29 (04) : 2272 - 2283
  • [35] Minimally invasive surgery and abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with early-stage cervical cancer: A meta-analysis
    Yu, Yuanyi
    Deng, Ting
    Gu, Shequn
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2022, 157 (02) : 255 - 264
  • [36] Results of radical surgery in women with stage IB2/IIA2 cervical cancer
    Derks, Marloes
    Biewenga, Petra
    van der Velden, Jacobus
    Kenter, Gemma G.
    Stalpers, Lukas J. A.
    Buist, Marrije R.
    [J]. ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2016, 95 (02) : 166 - 172
  • [37] Comparison of neoadjuvant treatments followed by radical surgery or chemoradiation on quality of life in patients with stage IB2-IIA cervical cancer
    Sun, Zhuoyu
    Huang, Bixuan
    Liu, Caiyan
    Yang, Yumeng
    Rao, Yang
    Du, Yue
    Ma, Yaomei
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2020, 157 (02) : 536 - 541
  • [38] Value Of Radiotherapy After Minimally Invasive Surgery In Patients With Stage IA1-IIA1 Cervical Cancer
    Gan, Y.
    Du, Q.
    Liu, W.
    Li, J.
    Jiang, X.
    Li, X.
    Ou, X.
    Yue, H.
    Zhu, H.
    Zhong, Q.
    Luo, D.
    Liang, Q.
    Xie, Y.
    Zhang, Q.
    Li, G.
    Shang, Y.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2020, 108 (03): : E495 - E495
  • [39] Adjuvant Radiotherapy After Minimally Invasive Surgery in Patients With Stage IA1-IIA1 Cervical Cancer
    Gan, Yi-xiu
    Du, Qing-hua
    Li, Jian
    Wei, Ye-ping
    Jiang, Xu-wei
    Xu, Xue-mei
    Yue, Hai-ying
    Li, Xiang-de
    Zhu, Hui-jun
    Ou, Xue
    Zhong, Qiu-lu
    Luo, Dan-jing
    Liang, Qian-fu
    Xie, Yi-ting
    Zhang, Qiang-qiang
    Li, Ge-li
    Shang, Yuan-ting
    Liu, Wen-qi
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2021, 11
  • [40] Extent of disease and oncologic outcomes in cervical cancer patients undergoing minimally invasive and open radical hysterectomy
    Gien, Lilian
    Cusimano, Maria
    Poxon, Amanda
    Sutradhar, Rinku
    Lena Nguyen
    Liu, Ning
    Ferguson, Sarah
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2023, 176 : S66 - S66