EU Cohesion Policy in the Czech Republic and Poland: Comparison of Intervention Areas Among Regions

被引:1
|
作者
Smekalova, Lenka [1 ]
Kucera, Filip [1 ]
机构
[1] Tomas Bata Univ Zlin, Fac Management & Econ, Mostni 5139, Zlin 76001, Czech Republic
关键词
Cohesion policy; Regional development; European Structural and Investment Funds; Lagging regions; Czech Republic; Poland; STRUCTURAL FUNDS; ECONOMIC-GROWTH; IMPACT; CONVERGENCE; SUPPORT; DISPARITIES; EVOLUTION; CONTEXT; INCOME; DONT;
D O I
10.46585/sp30021554
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The cohesion policy of the European Union represents a significant part of its budget and delivers interventions across all regions of the EU. There is little consensus on its efficiency, and its links to fostering convergence on the regional level are uncertain. Nevertheless, regions were shown to benefit from policy interventions promoting their growth and development. The main objective of the policy is to reduce regional disparities that exist among lagging and other, more developed regions. Therefore, this paper focuses on the deliverance of the cohesion policy in Central and Eastern European countries, Poland and the Czech Republic. It explores the support of thematic interventions across its regions in the 2014-2020 period. Findings point out different thematic support of Polish regions according to their relative advancement. Lagging regions of Poland received more substantial support related to promoting the endogenous potential for development and increase in quality of human capital. In contrast, the Czech regions were treated comparably regardless of their development stages. This points to different approaches to implementing the cohesion policy in these countries.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparison of Supporting and Advancing Talented Employees in the Czech Republic and Poland
    Stverkova, Hana
    Pohludka, Michal
    Czerna, Katarzyna
    [J]. DEVELOPMENT AND ADMINISTRATION OF BORDER AREAS OF THE CZECH REPUBLIC AND POLAND: SUPPORT FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT (RASPO 2021), 2021, : 237 - 243
  • [42] Comparison of Telework in the Czech Republic and Poland and Slovakia with Respect to the Gender
    Vrchota, Jaroslav
    Frantikova, Zuzana
    Vlckova, Miroslava
    [J]. HRADEC ECONOMIC DAYS, PT II, 2018, 2018, 8 : 451 - 458
  • [43] INFORMATION SECURITY INCIDENTS: A COMPARISON BETWEEN THE CZECH REPUBLIC AND POLAND
    Lisiak-Felicka, Dominika
    [J]. ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT (ESD), 2017, : 281 - 289
  • [44] Mapping novel psychoactive substances policy in the EU: The case of Portugal, the Netherlands, Czech Republic, Poland, the United Kingdom and Sweden
    Neicun, Jessica
    Steenhuizen, Marthe
    van Kessel, Robin
    Yang, Justin C.
    Negri, Attilio
    Czabanowska, Katarzyna
    Corazza, Ornella
    Roman-Urrestarazu, Andres
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (06):
  • [45] Adieu, Missile Defence? Security Policy Thinking in Poland and the Czech Republic
    Hynek, Nik
    Stritecky, Vit
    [J]. OSTEUROPA, 2010, 60 (06): : 75 - +
  • [46] Comparison of Health Care Policy among Czech Regions during 2000-2015
    Pavlik, Marek
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 20TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CURRENT TRENDS IN PUBLIC SECTOR RESEARCH, 2016, 20 : 344 - 351
  • [47] Construction Sector in the Czech Republic and Poland: Focus on the Housing Segment in Selected Regions
    Plaziak, Monika
    Szymanska, Anna Irena
    [J]. ENTREPRENEURIAL BUSINESS AND ECONOMICS REVIEW, 2014, 2 (02) : 47 - 63
  • [48] CULTURAL DIVERSITY AND INNOVATION: THE CASE OF THE CZECH REPUBLIC IN COMPARISON TO THE EU
    Mayerhoffer, Manuel
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 7TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND SUSTAINABILITY (IMES 2019), 2019, : 578 - 588
  • [49] The Role of the OECD and the EU in the Development of Labour Market Policy in the Czech Republic
    de la Porte, Caroline
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY EUROPEAN RESEARCH, 2009, 5 (04) : 539 - 556
  • [50] Assessing the implications of EU subsidy policy on renewable energy in Czech Republic
    Josef Maroušek
    Simona Hašková
    Robert Zeman
    Jan Váchal
    Radka Vaníčková
    [J]. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 2015, 17 : 549 - 554