Ensemble Kalman filter versus ensemble smoother for assessing hydraulic conductivity via tracer test data assimilation

被引:59
|
作者
Crestani, E. [1 ]
Camporese, M. [1 ]
Bau, D. [2 ]
Salandin, P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Padua, Dept Civil Environm & Architectural Engn, Padua, Italy
[2] Colorado State Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
关键词
TRANSPORT; FLOW; PARAMETERS; DISPERSION; SIMULATION; SYSTEMS; MODEL;
D O I
10.5194/hess-17-1517-2013
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
Estimating the spatial variability of hydraulic conductivity K in natural aquifers is important for predicting the transport of dissolved compounds. Especially in the non-reactive case, the plume evolution is mainly controlled by the heterogeneity of K. At the local scale, the spatial distribution of K can be inferred by combining the Lagrangian formulation of the transport with a Kalman-filter-based technique and assimilating a sequence of time-lapse concentration C measurements, which, for example, can be evaluated on site through the application of a geophysical method. The objective of this work is to compare the ensemble Kalman filter (EnKF) and the ensemble smoother (ES) capabilities to retrieve the hydraulic conductivity spatial distribution in a groundwater flow and transport modeling framework. The application refers to a two-dimensional synthetic aquifer in which a tracer test is simulated. Moreover, since Kalman-filter-based methods are optimal only if each of the involved variables fit to a Gaussian probability density function (pdf) and since this condition may not be met by some of the flow and transport state variables, issues related to the non-Gaussianity of the variables are analyzed and different transformation of the pdfs are considered in order to evaluate their influence on the performance of the methods. The results show that the EnKF reproduces with good accuracy the hydraulic conductivity field, outperforming the ES regardless of the pdf of the concentrations.
引用
收藏
页码:1517 / 1531
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Upper Atmosphere Data Assimilation With an Ensemble Kalman Filter
    Matsuo, Tomoko
    MODELING THE IONOSPHERE-THERMOSPHERE SYSTEM, 2013, 201 : 273 - 282
  • [22] A sequential ensemble Kalman filter for atmospheric data assimilation
    Houtekamer, PL
    Mitchell, HL
    MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW, 2001, 129 (01) : 123 - 137
  • [23] Ensemble smoother with multiple data assimilation
    Emerick, Alexandre A.
    Reynolds, Albert C.
    COMPUTERS & GEOSCIENCES, 2013, 55 : 3 - 15
  • [24] Review of the Ensemble Kalman Filter for Atmospheric Data Assimilation
    Houtekamer, P. L.
    Zhang, Fuqing
    MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW, 2016, 144 (12) : 4489 - 4532
  • [25] On numerical properties of the ensemble Kalman filter for data assimilation
    Li, Jia
    Xiu, Dongbin
    COMPUTER METHODS IN APPLIED MECHANICS AND ENGINEERING, 2008, 197 (43-44) : 3574 - 3583
  • [26] Data assimilation for distributed hydrological catchment modeling via ensemble Kalman filter
    Xie, Xianhong
    Zhang, Dongxiao
    ADVANCES IN WATER RESOURCES, 2010, 33 (06) : 678 - 690
  • [27] Data assimilation for transient flow in geologic formations via ensemble Kalman filter
    Chen, Yan
    Zhang, Dongxiao
    ADVANCES IN WATER RESOURCES, 2006, 29 (08) : 1107 - 1122
  • [28] Coupled and uncoupled hydrogeophysical inversions using ensemble Kalman filter assimilation of ERT-monitored tracer test data
    Camporese, Matteo
    Cassiani, Giorgio
    Deiana, Rita
    Salandin, Paolo
    Binley, Andrew
    WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2015, 51 (05) : 3277 - 3291
  • [29] Impacts of Assimilation Frequency on Ensemble Kalman Filter Data Assimilation and Imbalances
    He, Huan
    Lei, Lili
    Whitaker, Jeffrey S.
    Tan, Zhe-Min
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCES IN MODELING EARTH SYSTEMS, 2020, 12 (10)
  • [30] A fast, single-iteration ensemble Kalman smoother for sequential data assimilation
    Grudzien, Colin
    Bocquet, Marc
    GEOSCIENTIFIC MODEL DEVELOPMENT, 2022, 15 (20) : 7641 - 7681