Ensemble Kalman filter versus ensemble smoother for assessing hydraulic conductivity via tracer test data assimilation

被引:58
|
作者
Crestani, E. [1 ]
Camporese, M. [1 ]
Bau, D. [2 ]
Salandin, P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Padua, Dept Civil Environm & Architectural Engn, Padua, Italy
[2] Colorado State Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
关键词
TRANSPORT; FLOW; PARAMETERS; DISPERSION; SIMULATION; SYSTEMS; MODEL;
D O I
10.5194/hess-17-1517-2013
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
Estimating the spatial variability of hydraulic conductivity K in natural aquifers is important for predicting the transport of dissolved compounds. Especially in the non-reactive case, the plume evolution is mainly controlled by the heterogeneity of K. At the local scale, the spatial distribution of K can be inferred by combining the Lagrangian formulation of the transport with a Kalman-filter-based technique and assimilating a sequence of time-lapse concentration C measurements, which, for example, can be evaluated on site through the application of a geophysical method. The objective of this work is to compare the ensemble Kalman filter (EnKF) and the ensemble smoother (ES) capabilities to retrieve the hydraulic conductivity spatial distribution in a groundwater flow and transport modeling framework. The application refers to a two-dimensional synthetic aquifer in which a tracer test is simulated. Moreover, since Kalman-filter-based methods are optimal only if each of the involved variables fit to a Gaussian probability density function (pdf) and since this condition may not be met by some of the flow and transport state variables, issues related to the non-Gaussianity of the variables are analyzed and different transformation of the pdfs are considered in order to evaluate their influence on the performance of the methods. The results show that the EnKF reproduces with good accuracy the hydraulic conductivity field, outperforming the ES regardless of the pdf of the concentrations.
引用
收藏
页码:1517 / 1531
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] An Ensemble Kalman Filter and Smoother for Satellite Data Assimilation
    Stroud, Jonathan R.
    Stein, Michael L.
    Lesht, Barry M.
    Schwab, David J.
    Beletsky, Dmitry
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 2010, 105 (491) : 978 - 990
  • [2] Sequential Assimilation of Tracer Test Data by Ensemble Kalman Filter for Fracture Identification
    Goda, Takashi
    Sato, Kozo
    JOURNAL OF THE JAPAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE, 2009, 52 (05) : 275 - 282
  • [3] Snow data assimilation via an ensemble Kalman filter
    Slater, Andrew G.
    Clark, Martyn P.
    JOURNAL OF HYDROMETEOROLOGY, 2006, 7 (03) : 478 - 493
  • [4] Data assimilation in groundwater modelling: ensemble Kalman filter versus ensemble smoothers
    Li, Liangping
    Puzel, Ryan
    Davis, Arden
    HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 2018, 32 (13) : 2020 - 2029
  • [5] Ensemble Kalman smoother for soil moisture data assimilation
    Chu, Nan
    Huang, Chunlin
    Du, Peijun
    Shuikexue Jinzhan/Advances in Water Science, 2015, 26 (02): : 243 - 249
  • [6] Ensemble Kalman filter for data assimilation
    Chen, Yan
    COMPUTERS & GEOSCIENCES, 2013, 55 : 1 - 2
  • [7] A multimodel data assimilation framework via the ensemble Kalman filter
    Xue, Liang
    Zhang, Dongxiao
    WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2014, 50 (05) : 4197 - 4219
  • [8] Ensemble smoother assimilation of hydraulic head and return flow data to estimate hydraulic conductivity distribution
    Bailey, R.
    Bau, D.
    WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2010, 46
  • [9] Assessing the performance of the ensemble Kalman filter for land surface data assimilation
    Zhou, Yuhua
    McLaughlin, Dennis
    Entekhabi, Dara
    MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW, 2006, 134 (08) : 2128 - 2142
  • [10] Hydrologic data assimilation with the ensemble Kalman filter
    Reichle, RH
    McLaughlin, DB
    Entekhabi, D
    MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW, 2002, 130 (01) : 103 - 114