Residency application screening tools: A survey of academic medical centers

被引:34
|
作者
Hillebrand, Kristen [1 ]
Leinum, Corey J. [2 ]
Desai, Sonya [3 ]
Pettit, Natasha N. [4 ,5 ]
Fuller, Patrick D. [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cincinnati, Med Ctr, Burns Special Care Unit, Crit Care,Cardiovasc Intens Care Unit, Cincinnati, OH 45267 USA
[2] Univ Minnesota, Med Ctr, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[3] NYU, Langone Med Ctr, Dept Pharm,Div Pharmacotherapy, Pediat & Neonatal Crit Care, New York, NY USA
[4] Univ Chicago Med, Infect Dis, Chicago, IL USA
[5] Univ Chicago Med, Antimicrobial Stewardship Program, Dept Pharm, Chicago, IL USA
[6] Nebraska Med, Omaha, NE USA
关键词
D O I
10.2146/ajhp150093
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Purpose. The current use and content of screening tools utilized by ASHP-accredited pharmacy residency programs were assessed. Methods. A survey consisting of 19 questions assessing residency programs and the screening of pharmacy residency program applicants was e-mailed to residency directors of 362 pharmacy residency programs at 105 University HealthSystem Consortium (UHC)-member institutions. Questions gathered general program demographic information, data related to applicant growth from residency years 2010-11 to 2011-12, and information about the residency screening processes currently used. Results. Responses were received from 73 residency program sites (69.5%) of the 105 UHC-member institutions to whom the e-mail was sent. Many sites used screening tools to calculate applicants' scores and then determined which candidates to invite for an onsite interview based on applicants' scores and group discussion. Seventy-eight percent (n = 57) of the 73 responding institutions reported the use of a screening tool or rubric to select applicants to invite for onsite interviews. The most common method of evaluation was individual applicant review before meeting as a group to discuss candidate selection. The most important factor for determining which residency candidate to interview was the overall impression based on the candidate's curriculum vitae (CV) and letters of recommendation. Conclusion. Most residency programs in UHC-member hospitals used a screening tool to determine which applicants to invite for an onsite interview. The most important factor for determining which residency candidate to interview was the overall impression based on the candidate's CV and letters of recommendation.
引用
收藏
页码:S16 / S19
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Emergency Physician Involvement in Hospital Preparedness: A National Survey of Academic Medical Centers
    Ryan, Kevin M.
    Mostaghimi, Sina
    Dugas, Julianne
    Goralnick, Eric
    DISASTER MEDICINE AND PUBLIC HEALTH PREPAREDNESS, 2021, 15 (04) : 427 - 430
  • [22] POLICY ON POSTHUMOUS SPERM RETRIEVAL: SURVEY OF 75 MAJOR ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTERS
    Waler, Nicholas
    Ramasamy, Ranjith
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 197 (04): : E1341 - E1342
  • [23] The practice of thoracic epidural analgesia: A survey of academic medical centers in the United States
    Minzter, BH
    Johnson, RF
    Grimm, BJ
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2002, 95 (02): : 472 - 475
  • [24] Threats to the surgical residency in the Academic Medical Center
    Podnos, YD
    Wilson, SE
    ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2001, 136 (02) : 161 - 164
  • [25] A SURVEY OF THE CHIEF MEDICAL RESIDENCY IN CANADA
    LADELFA, I
    WILSON, DB
    KOPPLIN, PA
    CLINICAL AND INVESTIGATIVE MEDICINE-MEDECINE CLINIQUE ET EXPERIMENTALE, 1987, 10 (04): : B100 - B100
  • [26] Press Releases by Academic Medical Centers: Not So Academic?
    Woloshin, Steven
    Schwartz, Lisa M.
    Casella, Samuel L.
    Kennedy, Abigail T.
    Larson, Robin J.
    ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2009, 150 (09) : 613 - U8
  • [27] Reengineering academic medical centers: Reengineering academic values?
    Korn, D
    ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 1996, 71 (10) : 1033 - 1043
  • [28] Press releases by academic medical centers: Not so academic?
    Larson, R. J.
    Kennedy, A. T.
    Woloshin, S.
    Schwartz, L.
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2007, 22 : 55 - 56
  • [29] ROLE OF CLINICAL-EVALUATION IN ACADEMIC MEDICAL-CENTERS - RESULTS OF A NATIONAL SURVEY
    NASH, DB
    CARPENTER, CE
    ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 1995, 70 (03) : 239 - 241
  • [30] The multidisciplinary tumor board for the management of cutaneous neoplasms: A national survey of academic medical centers
    Scott, Brian L.
    Srivastava, Divya
    Nijhawan, Rajiv I.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY, 2018, 78 (06) : 1216 - +