Caesarean section and subsequent ectopic pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:18
|
作者
O'Neill, S. M. [1 ]
Khashan, A. S. [2 ]
Kenny, L. C. [2 ]
Greene, R. A. [1 ]
Henriksen, T. B. [3 ]
Lutomski, J. E. [1 ]
Kearney, P. M. [4 ]
机构
[1] Cork Univ, Matern Hosp, Natl Perinatal Epidemiol Ctr, 5th Floor, Cork, Ireland
[2] Cork Univ, Matern Hosp, Anu Res Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Cork, Ireland
[3] Aarhus Univ Hosp, Dept Paediat, Perinatal Epidemiol Res Unit, DK-8000 Aarhus, Denmark
[4] Natl Univ Ireland Univ Coll Cork, Dept Epidemiol & Publ Hlth, Cork, Ireland
关键词
Caesarean; ectopic pregnancy; meta-analysis; systematic review; RISK-FACTORS; URINARY-INCONTINENCE; MATERNAL DEATH; UNITED-STATES; POPULATION; DELIVERY; TRENDS; EPIDEMIOLOGY; MODES; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1111/1471-0528.12165
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background Caesarean section rates are increasing worldwide, and the long-term effects are unknown. Objective To evaluate the risk of subsequent ectopic pregnancy in women with a previous caesarean section, compared with vaginal delivery. Search strategy Systematic review of the literature using CINAHL, the Cochrane Library, Embase, Medline, PubMed, SCOPUS and Web of Knowledge, published from 1945 until 17 July 2011. Selection criteria Cohort and casecontrol designs reporting on the mode of delivery and subsequent ectopic pregnancy. Two reviewers independently assessed the titles, abstracts, and full articles to identify eligible studies, using a standardised data collection form, and also assessed the study quality. Reference lists of the studies included were also cross-checked. Data collection and analysis Odds ratios (ORs) were combined using a random-effect model to estimate the overall association between caesarean section delivery and the risk of subsequent ectopic pregnancy. Main results Thirteen studies were included, which recruited a total of 61978 women. Five studies reported adjustment for confounding factors, and the pooled OR of subsequent ectopic pregnancy following a caesarean section was 1.05 (95%CI 0.512.15). The removal of one study that reported outlier results yielded a pooled OR of 0.82 (95%CI 0.421.61). The pooled crude OR for all 13 studies was 1.36 (95%CI 0.991.88). Author's conclusions This review found no evidence of an association between prior caesarean section delivery and the occurrence of a subsequent ectopic pregnancy, but the studies included were of poor or variable quality, and only a small number adjusted for potential confounding factors. Further research of a higher methodological quality is required to assess any potential association between mode of delivery and subsequent ectopic pregnancy.
引用
收藏
页码:671 / 680
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Caesarean section in pregnancies conceived by assisted reproductive technology: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Lodge-Tulloch, Nakeisha A.
    Elias, Flavia T. S.
    Pudwell, Jessica
    Gaudet, Laura
    Walker, Mark
    Smith, Graeme N.
    Velez, Maria P.
    [J]. BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [32] A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Wound Complications after a Caesarean Section in Obese Women
    Slabuszewska-Jozwiak, Aneta
    Szymanski, Jacek Krzysztof
    Jozwiak, Lukasz
    Sarecka-Hujar, Beata
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2021, 10 (04) : 1 - 22
  • [33] A systematic review and meta-analysis of the prevalence and association between levonorgestrel and ectopic pregnancy
    Sapapsap, Bannawich
    Leelakanok, Nattawut
    Boonpattharatthiti, Kansak
    Siritientong, Tippawan
    Methaneethorn, Janthima
    [J]. EXPERT OPINION ON DRUG SAFETY, 2023, 22 (10) : 929 - 941
  • [34] The association between caesarean section and childhood asthma: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis
    Behzad Darabi
    Shoboo Rahmati
    Mohammad Reza HafeziAhmadi
    Gholamreza Badfar
    Milad Azami
    [J]. Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology, 15
  • [35] Caesarean section and obesity in young adult offspring: Update of a systematic review with meta-analysis
    Quecke, Berenike
    Graf, Yannick
    Epure, Adina-Mihaela
    Santschi, Valerie
    Chiolero, Arnaud
    Carmeli, Cristian
    Cullati, Stephane
    [J]. OBESITY REVIEWS, 2022, 23 (02)
  • [36] A systematic review with network meta-analysis on mono strategy of anaesthesia for preeclampsia in caesarean section
    Chu Cheng
    Alan Hsi-Wen Liao
    Chien-Yu Chen
    Yu-Cih Lin
    Yi-No Kang
    [J]. Scientific Reports, 11
  • [37] Women's preference for caesarean section: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies
    Mazzoni, A.
    Althabe, F.
    Liu, N. H.
    Bonotti, A. M.
    Gibbons, L.
    Sanchez, A. J.
    Belizan, J. M.
    [J]. BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2011, 118 (04) : 391 - 399
  • [38] Is general anaesthesia for caesarean section associated with postpartum haemorrhage? Systematic review and meta-analysis
    Heesen, Michael
    Hofmann, Thomas
    Kloehr, Sven
    Rossaint, Rolf
    van de Velde, Marc
    Deprest, Jan
    Straube, Sebastian
    [J]. ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2013, 57 (09) : 1092 - 1102
  • [39] Effect of misoprostol versus oxytocin during caesarean section: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Hua, J.
    Chen, G.
    Xing, F.
    Scott, M.
    Li, Q.
    [J]. BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2013, 120 (05) : 531 - 540
  • [40] Prevalence, indications, and outcomes of caesarean section deliveries in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Gedefaw, Getnet
    Demis, Asmamaw
    Alemnew, Birhan
    Wondmieneh, Adam
    Getie, Addisu
    Waltengus, Fikadu
    [J]. PATIENT SAFETY IN SURGERY, 2020, 14 (01)