Radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer patients with prostate-specific antigen >20 ng/ml

被引:8
|
作者
Ou, YC
Chen, JT
Cheng, CL
Ho, HC
Yang, CR
机构
[1] Taichung Vet Gen Hosp, Dept Surg, Div Urol, Taichung 40705, Taiwan
[2] Natl Yang Ming Univ, Taichung Vet Gen Hosp, Sch Med, Dept Pathol, Taichung, Taiwan
[3] Chung Shan Med Univ, Inst Med, Taichung, Taiwan
关键词
adenocarcinoma; prostate; prostatectomy; prostate-specific antigen; PSA;
D O I
10.1093/jjco/hyg104
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective: Prostate cancer patients with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) >20 ng/ml are at high risk of progression after radical prostatectomy. Comparison has seldom been made between the outcomes of patients with PSA 20.1-50 ng/ml and those with PSA >50 ng/ml after radical prostatectomy. We retrospectively analyzed the outcomes of these two groups. Methods: From 1993 to 2002, 60 prostate cancer patients receiving radical prostatectomy were enrolled in this study. Thirty-seven patients with PSA 20.1-50 ng/ml were assigned to Group I. Twenty-three patients with PSA >50 ng/ml were assigned to Group II. Preoperatively, Group 11 had greater PSA and PSA density than Group I (P < 0.0001). Group 11 had higher biopsy Gleason score and clinical stage than Group I (P < 0.05). Pathological categories and outcomes of both groups were compared. Results: Group 11 had higher Gleason score and tumor volume than Group I (P < 0.05). The incidence of organ-confined diseases was 29.7% in Group I and 0% in Group 11 (P < 0.05). Group 11 had higher incidence of extracapsular tumor extension, positive surgical margin and lymph node involvement than Group I (P < 0.05). The incidence of postoperative PSA >0.01 ng/ml and PSA failure were higher in Group I I than Group I (P < 0.05). Need for adjuvant treatment and death from prostate cancer was similar in both groups. Conclusion: Patients with PSA >50 ng/ml had a poorer prognosis than patients with PSA 20.1-50 ng/ml. Those with PSA >50 ng/ml had shorter freedom from PSA failure survivals than those with PSA 20.1-50 ng/ml (P = 0.004). Classification of high-risk prostate patients into two sub-groups with PSA 20.1-50 ng/ml and PSA >50 ng/ml should be considered.
引用
收藏
页码:574 / 579
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparison among different precursor prostate-specific antigen isoform derivatives on prostate cancer prediction in patients with serum prostate-specific antigen bellow 10 ng/ml
    Stojadinovic, Milorad M.
    Pantic, Damnjan N.
    Andjelkovic, Marija, V
    Stojadinovic, Miroslav M.
    [J]. SRPSKI ARHIV ZA CELOKUPNO LEKARSTVO, 2020, 148 (3-4) : 160 - 166
  • [22] Prostate cancer-specific mortality after radical prostatectomy for patients treated in the prostate-specific antigen era
    Stephenson, Andrew J.
    Kattan, Michael W.
    Eastham, James A.
    Klein, Eric A.
    Bianco, Fernando J.
    Vickers, Andrew J.
    Yossepowitch, Ofer
    Scardino, Peter T.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2008, 179 (04): : 649 - 649
  • [23] Prostate Cancer-Specific Mortality After Radical Prostatectomy for Patients Treated in the Prostate-Specific Antigen Era
    Stephenson, Andrew J.
    Kattan, Michael W.
    Eastham, James A.
    Bianco, Fernando J., Jr.
    Yossepowitch, Ofer
    Vickers, Andrew J.
    Klein, Eric A.
    Wood, David P.
    Scardino, Peter T.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 27 (26) : 4300 - 4305
  • [24] The impact of prostate-specific antigen density in predicting prostate cancer when serum prostate-specific antigen levels are less than 10 ng/ml
    Akdas, A
    Tarcan, T
    Turkeri, L
    Cevik, I
    Biren, T
    Ilker, Y
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 1996, 29 (02) : 189 - 192
  • [25] Oncological and peri-surgical outcomes of radical prostatectomy for non-metastatic prostate cancer with prostate-specific antigen level of 50 ng/ml or greater
    Makino, Katsuhiro
    Nakagawa, Tohru
    Ito, Eisaku
    Kasahara, Ichiro
    Murata, Takashi
    Fujimura, Tetsuya
    Fukuhara, Hiroshi
    Homma, Yukio
    [J]. JAPANESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 48 (05) : 485 - 490
  • [26] Influence of Tumor Burden on Serum Prostate-Specific Antigen in Prostate Cancer Patients Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy
    Mandel, Philipp
    Hoeh, Benedikt
    Preisser, Felix
    Wenzel, Mike
    Humke, Clara
    Welte, Maria-Noemi
    Jerrentrup, Inga
    Koellermann, Jens
    Wild, Peter
    Tilki, Derya
    Haese, Alexander
    Becker, Andreas
    Roos, Frederik C.
    Chun, Felix K. H.
    Kluth, Luis A.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2021, 11
  • [27] Negative 11C-choline PET/computed tomography imaging in restaging of patients with prostate cancer with serum prostate-specific antigen values &gt;20 ng/mL
    Telo, Silvi
    Fanti, Stefano
    Nanni, Cristina
    Lambertini, Alessandro
    Picchio, Maria
    Gianolli, Luigi
    Schiavina, Riccardo
    Bianchi, Lorenzo
    Briganti, Alberto
    Mapelli, Paola
    Castellucci, Paolo
    Farolfi, Andrea
    [J]. NUCLEAR MEDICINE COMMUNICATIONS, 2020, 41 (11) : 1178 - 1182
  • [28] Should patients with a pre-operative prostate-specific antigen greater than 15ng/ml be offered radical prostatectomy?
    O'Brien, MF
    Connolly, SS
    Kelly, DG
    O'Brien, A
    Quinlan, DM
    Mulvin, DW
    [J]. IRISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2004, 173 (01) : 23 - 26
  • [29] Impact of pathological tumor stage for salvage radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy in patients with prostate-specific antigen &lt; 1.0 ng/ml
    Umezawa, Rei
    Ariga, Hisanori
    Ogawa, Yoshihiro
    Jingu, Keiichi
    Matsushita, Haruo
    Takeda, Ken
    Fujimoto, Keisuke
    Sakayauchi, Toru
    Sugawara, Toshiyuki
    Kubozono, Masaki
    Narazaki, Kakutaro
    Shimizu, Eiji
    Takai, Yoshihiro
    Yamada, Shogo
    [J]. RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2011, 6
  • [30] The Clinical Course of Patients With Prostate-Specific Antigen ≥100 ng/ml: Insight Into a Potential Population for Targeted Prostate-Specific Antigen Screening
    Leung, Andrew K.
    Hugar, Lee
    Patil, Dattatraya
    Wong, Lisa
    Carthon, Bradley
    Carney, K. Jeff
    Birdsong, George, II
    Moses, Kelvin A.
    Master, Viraj A.
    [J]. UROLOGY, 2018, 117 : 101 - 106