Rural land-use trends in the conterminous United States, 1950-2000

被引:561
|
作者
Brown, DG [1 ]
Johnson, KM
Loveland, TR
Theobald, DM
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Sch Nat Resources & Environm, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Loyola Univ, Dept Sociol, Chicago, IL 60626 USA
[3] USGS, Eros Data Ctr, Sioux Falls, SD 57198 USA
[4] Colorado State Univ, Nat Resource Ecol Lab, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
关键词
agriculture; demography; dispersed development; land-use change;
D O I
10.1890/03-5220
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
In order to understand the magnitude, direction, and geographic distribution of land-use changes, we evaluated land-use trends in U.S. counties during the latter half of the 20th century. Our paper synthesizes the dominant spatial and temporal trends in population, agriculture, and urbanized land uses, using a variety of data sources and;in ecoregion classification as a frame of reference. A combination of increasing attractiveness of nonmetropolitan areas in the period 1970-2000, decreasing household size, and decreasing density,of settlement has resulted in important trends in the patterns of developled land. By 2000, the area of low-density, exurban development beyond the urban fringe occupied nearly 15 times the area of higher density urbanized development. Efficiency gains, mechanization, and agglomeration of agricultural concerns has resulted in data that show cropland area to be stable throughout the Corn Belt and parts of the West between 1950 and 2000, but decreasing by about 22% east of the Mississippi River. We use a regional case study of the Mid-Atlantic and Southeastern regions to focus in more detail on the land-cover changes resulting from these dynamics. Dominating were land-cover changes associated with the timber practices in the forested plains ecoregions and urbanization in the piedmont ecoregions. Appalachian ecoregions show the slowest rates of land-cover change. The dominant trends of tremendous exurban growth, throughout the United States, and conversion and abandonment of agricultural lands, especially in the eastern United States, have important implications because they affect large areas of the country, the functioning of ecological systems, and the potential for restoration.
引用
收藏
页码:1851 / 1863
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] ENERGY AND LAND-USE - INSTRUMENT OF UNITED-STATES CONSERVATION POLICY
    KEYES, DL
    ENERGY POLICY, 1976, 4 (03) : 225 - 236
  • [42] Projected land-use change impacts on ecosystem services in the United States
    Lawler, Joshua J.
    Lewis, David J.
    Nelson, Erik
    Plantinga, Andrew J.
    Polasky, Stephen
    Withey, John C.
    Helmers, David P.
    Martinuzzi, Sebastin
    Pennington, Derric
    Radeloff, Volker C.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2014, 111 (20) : 7492 - 7497
  • [43] Seasonal temperature responses to land-use change in the western United States
    Kueppers, Lara M.
    Snyder, Mark A.
    Sloan, Lisa C.
    Cayan, Dan
    Jin, Jiming
    Kanamaru, Hideki
    Kanamitsu, Masao
    Miller, Norman L.
    Tyree, Mary
    Due, Hui
    Weare, Bryan
    GLOBAL AND PLANETARY CHANGE, 2008, 60 (3-4) : 250 - 264
  • [44] LAND-USE POLICY AND PROBLEMS IN THE UNITED-STATES - OTTOSON,H
    ZIMMERMAN, JF
    TECHNOLOGY AND CULTURE, 1965, 6 (01) : 140 - 142
  • [45] Future Land-Use Changes and the Potential for Novelty in Ecosystems of the United States
    Martinuzzi, Sebastian
    Gavier-Pizarro, Gregorio I.
    Lugo, Ariel E.
    Radeloff, Volker C.
    ECOSYSTEMS, 2015, 18 (08) : 1332 - 1342
  • [46] LAND-USE AND ITS PATTERNS IN THE UNITED-STATES - MARSCHNER,FJ
    GLENDINNING, RM
    GEOGRAPHICAL REVIEW, 1960, 50 (04) : 610 - 611
  • [48] LAND-USE POLICY AND PROBLEMS IN THE UNITED-STATES - OTTOSON,HW
    TOLLEY, GS
    AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 1964, 54 (05): : 845 - 848
  • [49] LAND-USE POLICY AND PROBLEMS IN THE UNITED-STATES - OTTOSON,HW
    LONGEST, JW
    RURAL SOCIOLOGY, 1964, 29 (02) : 218 - 219
  • [50] LAND-USE AND ITS PATTERN IN THE UNITED-STATES - MARSCHNER,FJ
    PICKARD, JP
    PROFESSIONAL GEOGRAPHER, 1960, 12 (06): : 39 - 39