Assessment of the Ecosystem Services Capacity in Natural Protected Areas for Biodiversity Conservation

被引:4
|
作者
Ronchi, Silvia [1 ]
Salata, Stefano [2 ]
机构
[1] Politecn Milan, Dept Architecture & Urban Studies, Milan, Italy
[2] Politecn Torino, Interuniv Dept Reg & Urban Studies & Planning, Turin, Italy
关键词
LAND-USE; RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT; CONSEQUENCES;
D O I
10.1088/1757-899X/245/7/072031
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Recently, in Italy, a legislative proposal has been set to reform the role and the functions of natural protected areas promoting their aggregation (or the abolition) pursuing a better efficiency for their administration and economic saving. The system of natural protected areas is composed of different conservation levels: there are the Natural parks, established in the '80 by national or regional institution for the safeguard of natural elements, the Natura 2000 Habitat 92/43/CEE promoted by European Union, with conservation measures for maintaining or restoring habitats and species of Communitarian interest, and the local parks of supra-municipal interest (namely PLIS) created by single municipalities or their aggregation aimed at limiting the soil sealing process. The hierarchical level of protection has determined differences in the management of the areas which leads to various approaches and strategies for biodiversity conservation and integrity. In order to assess strengths and weaknesses of the legislative initiative, the new management framework should be designed, considering the ecosystem characteristics of each natural protected area to define the future opportunities and critics, rather than, in the extreme case, remove the level of protection due to the absence of valuable ecosystem conditions. The paper provides an operative support to better apply the legislative proposal investigating the dynamics that affect all protected areas using the land take process as a major threat to biodiversity conservation in natural zones. The land take process is explored using the Land Use Change analysis (LUCa) as a possible way to determine the impact and the environmental effects of land transitions. LUCa is also useful to determine the loss of protected zones capacity to support Ecosystem Services. Finally, the assessment of the Ecosystem Services Capacity (ESC) index expresses the ability of each LULC to provide ES and, in particular, the Ecological Integrity, Regulating Services and Provisioning Services. The efficacy of the proposal is tested in the Lombardy Region (Northwest of Italy) where the natural protected areas are more than 500 with a territorial extension of 740 thousand hectares that correspond to 31% of the regional surface.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Management of protected areas and conservation of biodiversity in Iran
    Makhdoum, M.F.
    [J]. International Journal of Environmental Studies, 2008, 65 (04) : 563 - 585
  • [22] Biodiversity conservation gaps in the Brazilian protected areas
    Ubirajara Oliveira
    Britaldo Silveira Soares-Filho
    Adriano Pereira Paglia
    Antonio D. Brescovit
    Claudio J. B. de Carvalho
    Daniel Paiva Silva
    Daniella T. Rezende
    Felipe Sá Fortes Leite
    João Aguiar Nogueira Batista
    João Paulo Peixoto Pena Barbosa
    João Renato Stehmann
    John S. Ascher
    Marcelo Ferreira de Vasconcelos
    Paulo De Marco
    Peter Löwenberg-Neto
    Viviane Gianluppi Ferro
    Adalberto J. Santos
    [J]. Scientific Reports, 7
  • [23] Assessment of the effectiveness of China's protected areas in enhancing ecosystem services
    Yu, Chaoyue
    Zhang, Zhonghao
    Jeppesen, Erik
    Gao, Yang
    Liu, Yuexin
    Liu, Yongjie
    Lu, Qingling
    Wang, Chenxu
    Sun, Ximan
    [J]. ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2024, 65
  • [24] Assessment of biodiversity as a mechanism for changing the status of specially protected natural areas
    Ryabov, V. M.
    Ryabova, E., V
    Ashikhmina, T. Ya
    [J]. THEORETICAL AND APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2021, (03): : 111 - 117
  • [25] Mapping of biodiversity hubs and key ecosystem services as a tool for shaping optimal areas for conservation
    Gatwaza, Olivier Clement
    Wang, Xiangrong
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (08):
  • [26] Ecosystem services and biodiversity conservation: concepts and a glossary
    Harrington, Richard
    Anton, Christian
    Dawson, Terence P.
    de Bello, Francesco
    Feld, Christian K.
    Haslett, John R.
    Kluvankova-Oravska, Tatiana
    Kontogianni, Areti
    Lavorel, Sandra
    Luck, Gary W.
    Rounsevell, Mark D. A.
    Samways, Michael J.
    Settele, Josef
    Skourtos, Michalis
    Spangenberg, Joachim H.
    Vandewalle, Marie
    Zobel, Martin
    Harrison, Paula A.
    [J]. BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION, 2010, 19 (10) : 2773 - 2790
  • [27] Questioning the ecosystem services argument for biodiversity conservation
    Ridder, Ben
    [J]. BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION, 2008, 17 (04) : 781 - 790
  • [28] Beyond ecosystem services as justification for biodiversity conservation
    Prendergast, Kit S.
    [J]. AUSTRAL ECOLOGY, 2020, 45 (02) : 141 - 143
  • [29] Questioning the ecosystem services argument for biodiversity conservation
    Ben Ridder
    [J]. Biodiversity and Conservation, 2008, 17 : 781 - 790
  • [30] Ecosystem services and biodiversity conservation: concepts and a glossary
    Richard Harrington
    Christian Anton
    Terence P. Dawson
    Francesco de Bello
    Christian K. Feld
    John R. Haslett
    Tatiana Kluvánkova-Oravská
    Areti Kontogianni
    Sandra Lavorel
    Gary W. Luck
    Mark D. A. Rounsevell
    Michael J. Samways
    Josef Settele
    Michalis Skourtos
    Joachim H. Spangenberg
    Marie Vandewalle
    Martin Zobel
    Paula A. Harrison
    [J]. Biodiversity and Conservation, 2010, 19 : 2773 - 2790