Multi-Agent Plan Recognition: Formalization and Algorithms

被引:0
|
作者
Banerjee, Bikramjit [1 ]
Kraemer, Landon [1 ]
Lyle, Jeremy [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southern Mississippi, Sch Comp, 118 Coll Dr 5106, Hattiesburg, MS 39406 USA
[2] Univ Southern Mississippi, Dept Math, Hattiesburg, MS 39406 USA
关键词
INTERVAL-GRAPHS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Multi-Agent Plan Recognition (MAPR) seeks to identify the dynamic team structures and team behaviors from the observations of the activity-sequences of a set of intelligent agents, based on a library of known team-activities (plan library). It has important applications in analyzing data from automated monitoring, surveillance, and intelligence analysis in general. In this paper, we formalize MAPR using a basic model that explicates the cost of abduction in single agent plan recognition by "flattening" or decompressing the (usually compact, hierarchical) plan library. We show that single-agent plan recognition with a decompressed library can be solved in time polynomial in the input size, while it is known that with a compressed (by partial ordering constraints) library it is NP-complete. This leads to an important insight: that although the compactness of the plan library plays an important role in the hardness of single-agent plan recognition (as recognized in the existing literature), that is not the case with multiple agents. We show, for the first time, that MAPR is NP-complete even when the (multi-agent) plan library is fully decompressed. As with previous solution approaches, we break the problem into two stages: hypothesis generation and hypothesis search. We show that Knuth's "Algorithm X" (with the efficient "dancing links" representation) is particularly suited for our model, and can be adapted to perform a branch and bound search for the second stage, in this model. We show empirically that this new approach leads to significant pruning of the hypothesis space in MAPR.
引用
收藏
页码:1059 / 1064
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A Multi-Agent Model for Optimizing Train Formation Plan
    Wang Wei
    Liu Jun
    Jiang Xi
    [J]. ICIC 2009: SECOND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION AND COMPUTING SCIENCE, VOL 4, PROCEEDINGS: MODELLING AND SIMULATION IN ENGINEERING, 2009, : 256 - 259
  • [42] Primary and secondary diagnosis of multi-agent plan execution
    de Jonge, Femke
    Roos, Nico
    Witteveen, Cees
    [J]. AUTONOMOUS AGENTS AND MULTI-AGENT SYSTEMS, 2009, 18 (02) : 267 - 294
  • [43] Team cooperation for plan recovery in multi-agent systems
    Micalizio, Roberto
    Torasso, Pietro
    [J]. MULTIAGENT SYSTEM TECHNOLOGIES, PROCEEDINGS, 2007, 4687 : 170 - +
  • [44] Representation and execution of plan sequences for multi-agent systems
    Pirjanian, P
    Huntsberger, TL
    Barrett, A
    [J]. IROS 2001: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2001 IEEE/RJS INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT ROBOTS AND SYSTEMS, VOLS 1-4: EXPANDING THE SOCIETAL ROLE OF ROBOTICS IN THE NEXT MILLENNIUM, 2001, : 2117 - 2123
  • [45] Plan Recovery Process in Multi-agent Dynamic Environments
    Moreira, Leonardo Henrique
    Ralha, Celia Ghedini
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 18TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATICS IN CONTROL, AUTOMATION AND ROBOTICS (ICINCO), 2021, : 187 - 194
  • [46] Multi-agent Reactive Planning for Solving Plan Failures
    Guzman-Alvarez, Cesar
    Castejon, Pablo
    Onaindia, Eva
    Frank, Jeremy
    [J]. HYBRID ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, 2013, 8073 : 530 - 539
  • [47] Plan, Commit, Execute Protocol in Multi-agent Systems
    Kadera, Petr
    Tichy, Pavel
    [J]. HOLONIC AND MULTI-AGENT SYSTEMS FOR MANUFACTURING, PROCEEDINGS, 2009, 5696 : 155 - 164
  • [48] Probabilistic Plan Synthesis for Coupled Multi-Agent Systems
    Nikou, Alexandros
    Tumova, Jana
    Dimarogonas, Dimos V.
    [J]. IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2017, 50 (01): : 10766 - 10771
  • [49] A Distributed Approach for Multi-Agent Plan Monitoring and Diagnosis
    Athamena, Belkacem
    Houhamdi, Zina
    [J]. 2015 SAI INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS CONFERENCE (INTELLISYS), 2015, : 863 - 870
  • [50] Primary and secondary diagnosis of multi-agent plan execution
    Femke de Jonge
    Nico Roos
    Cees Witteveen
    [J]. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 2009, 18 : 267 - 294