Exploring levers and barriers to accessing primary care for marginalised groups and identifying their priorities for primary care provision: a participatory learning and action research study

被引:57
|
作者
O'Donnell, Patrick [1 ]
Tierney, Edel [1 ]
O'Carroll, Austin [2 ]
Nurse, Diane [3 ]
MacFarlane, Anne [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Limerick, Grad Entry Med Sch, Limerick, Ireland
[2] Catherine McAuley Ctr, North Dublin City Gen Practice Training Scheme, Nelson St, Dublin 7, Ireland
[3] Hlth Serv Execut, Primary Care Div, Natl Social Inclus Off, Mill Lane, Dublin 20, Ireland
关键词
Primary healthcare; Marginalised groups; Access; Participatory research; Equity; Patient and public involvement (PPI); Vulnerable groups; Hard to reach; PRIMARY-HEALTH-CARE; COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION; UNDOCUMENTED IMMIGRANTS; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; EXPERIENCES; HOMELESS; SERVICES; REFUGEE; TRAVELERS; MIGRANTS;
D O I
10.1186/s12939-016-0487-5
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: The involvement of patients and the public in healthcare has grown significantly in recent decades and is documented in health policy documents internationally. Many benefits of involving these groups in primary care planning have been reported. However, these benefits are rarely felt by those considered marginalised in society and they are often excluded from participating in the process of planning primary care. It has been recommended to employ suitable approaches, such as co-operative and participatory initiatives, to enable marginalised groups to highlight their priorities for care. Methods: This Participatory Learning and Action (PLA) research study involved 21 members of various marginalised groups who contributed their views about access to primary care. Using a series of PLA techniques for data generation and co-analysis, we explored barriers and facilitators to primary healthcare access from the perspective of migrants, Irish Travellers, homeless people, drug users, sex workers and people living in deprivation, and identified their priorities for action with regard to primary care provision. Results: Four overarching themes were identified: the home environment, the effects of the 'two-tier' healthcare system on engagement, healthcare encounters, and the complex health needs of many in those groups. The study demonstrates that there are many complicated personal and structural barriers to accessing primary healthcare for marginalised groups. There were shared and differential experiences across the groups. Participants also expressed shared priorities for action in the planning and running of primary care services. Conclusions: Members of marginalised groups have shared priorities for action to improve their access to primary care. If steps are taken to address these, there is scope to impact on more than one marginalised group and to address the existing health inequities.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Exploring barriers and opportunities to improve osteoporosis care across the acute-to-primary care interface: a qualitative study
    Michael J Bennett
    Jacqueline R Center
    Lin Perry
    Osteoporosis International, 2023, 34 : 1249 - 1262
  • [32] Exploring barriers and opportunities to improve osteoporosis care across the acute-to-primary care interface: a qualitative study
    Bennett, Michael J.
    Center, Jacqueline R.
    Perry, Lin
    OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2023, 34 (07) : 1249 - 1262
  • [33] Realising radical potential: building community power in primary health care through Participatory Action Research
    Mabetha, Denny
    Ojewola, Temitope
    van der Merwe, Maria
    Mabika, Reflect
    Goosen, Gerhard
    Sigudla, Jerry
    Hove, Jennifer
    Witter, Sophie
    D'Ambruoso, Lucia
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR EQUITY IN HEALTH, 2023, 22 (01)
  • [34] Involving deprived communities in improving the quality of primary care services: does participatory action research work?
    Cawston, Peter G.
    Mercer, Stewart W.
    Barbour, Rosaline S.
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2007, 7
  • [35] Challenging Gender Certainties in Early Childhood Care and Education: A Participatory Action Learning and Action Research Study
    Mahadew, Ashnie
    Hlalele, Dipane
    EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH FOR SOCIAL CHANGE, 2022, 11 (01): : 10 - 26
  • [36] Realising radical potential: building community power in primary health care through Participatory Action Research
    Denny Mabetha
    Temitope Ojewola
    Maria van der Merwe
    Reflect Mabika
    Gerhard Goosen
    Jerry Sigudla
    Jennifer Hove
    Sophie Witter
    Lucia D’Ambruoso
    International Journal for Equity in Health, 22
  • [37] Increasing capacity for innovation in bureaucratic primary care organizations: A whole system participatory action research project
    Thomas, P
    McDonnell, J
    McCulloch, J
    While, A
    Bosanquet, N
    Ferlie, E
    ANNALS OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2005, 3 (04) : 312 - 317
  • [38] Involving deprived communities in improving the quality of primary care services: does participatory action research work?
    Peter G Cawston
    Stewart W Mercer
    Rosaline S Barbour
    BMC Health Services Research, 7
  • [39] Identifying top 10 primary care research priorities from international stakeholders using a modified Delphi method
    O'Neill, Braden
    Aversa, Vanessa
    Rouleau, Katherine
    Lazare, Kim
    Sullivan, Frank
    Persaud, Nav
    PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (10):
  • [40] Identifying primary care patient safety research priorities in the UK: a James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership
    Morris, Rebecca Lauren
    Stocks, Susan Jill
    Alam, Rahul
    Taylor, Sian
    Rolfe, Carly
    Glover, Steven William
    Whitcombe, Joanne
    Campbell, Stephen M.
    BMJ OPEN, 2018, 8 (02):