Does coaching work? A meta-analysis on the effects of coaching on individual level outcomes in an organizational context

被引:294
|
作者
Theeboom, Tim [1 ]
Beersma, Bianca [1 ]
van Vianen, Annelies E. M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Dept Work & Org Psychol, NL-1018 XA Amsterdam, Netherlands
来源
JOURNAL OF POSITIVE PSYCHOLOGY | 2014年 / 9卷 / 01期
关键词
coaching; coaching effectiveness; coaching interventions; coaching outcomes; meta-analysis; COGNITIVE-BEHAVIORAL-THERAPY; EFFECT SIZE; JOB-SATISFACTION; SELF-DETERMINATION; GOAL ATTAINMENT; PERFORMANCE; HEALTH; DEPRESSION; MOTIVATION; EMPLOYEES;
D O I
10.1080/17439760.2013.837499
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Whereas coaching is very popular as a management tool, research on coaching effectiveness is lagging behind. Moreover, the studies on coaching that are currently available have focused on a large variety of processes and outcome measures and generally lack a firm theoretical foundation. With the meta-analysis presented in this article, we aim to shed light on the effectiveness of coaching within an organizational context. We address the question whether coaching has an effect on five both theoretically and practically relevant individual-level outcome categories: performance/skills, well-being, coping, work attitudes, and goal-directed self-regulation. The results show that coaching has significant positive effects on all outcomes with effect sizes ranging from g=0.43 (coping) to g=0.74 (goal-directed self-regulation). These findings indicate that coaching is, overall, an effective intervention in organizations.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 18
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The effectiveness of workplace coaching: A meta-analysis of learning and performance outcomes from coaching
    Jones, Rebecca J.
    Woods, Stephen A.
    Guillaume, Yves R. F.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 89 (02) : 249 - 277
  • [2] Individual and Organizational Trust in a Reciprocal Peer Coaching Context
    Cox, Elaine
    [J]. MENTORING & TUTORING, 2012, 20 (03): : 427 - 443
  • [3] Workplace coaching: a meta-analysis and recommendations for advancing the science of coaching
    Cannon-Bowers, Janis A.
    Bowers, Clint A.
    Carlson, Catherine E.
    Doherty, Shannon L.
    Evans, Jocelyne
    Hall, Julie
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2023, 14
  • [4] Does generativity matter? A meta-analysis on individual work outcomes
    Justyna Wiktorowicz
    Izabela Warwas
    Dariusz Turek
    Iwa Kuchciak
    [J]. European Journal of Ageing, 2022, 19 : 977 - 995
  • [5] Does generativity matter? A meta-analysis on individual work outcomes
    Wiktorowicz, Justyna
    Warwas, Izabela
    Turek, Dariusz
    Kuchciak, Iwa
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF AGEING, 2022, 19 (04) : 977 - 995
  • [6] Is cognitive-behavioral coaching an empirically supported approach to coaching? a meta-analysis to investigate its outcomes and moderators
    Tomoiaga, Cristina
    David, Oana
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RATIONAL-EMOTIVE AND COGNITIVE-BEHAVIOR THERAPY, 2023, 41 (02): : 489 - 510
  • [7] Is cognitive-behavioral coaching an empirically supported approach to coaching? a meta-analysis to investigate its outcomes and moderators
    Cristina Tomoiagă
    Oana David
    [J]. Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy, 2023, 41 : 489 - 510
  • [8] The relationship between working alliance and client outcomes in coaching: A meta-analysis
    Grassmann, Carolin
    Schoelmerich, Franziska
    Schermuly, Carsten C.
    [J]. HUMAN RELATIONS, 2020, 73 (01) : 35 - 58
  • [9] Proposed Sources of Coaching Efficacy: A Meta-Analysis
    Myers, Nicholas D.
    Park, Sung Eun
    Ahn, Soyeon
    Lee, Seungmin
    Sullivan, Philip J.
    Feltz, Deborah L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SPORT & EXERCISE PSYCHOLOGY, 2017, 39 (04): : 261 - 276
  • [10] Passion at work: A meta-analysis of individual work outcomes
    Pollack, Jeffrey M.
    Ho, Violet T.
    O'Boyle, Ernest H.
    Kirkman, Bradley L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR, 2020, 41 (04) : 311 - 331