Prima-vista multi-vessel percutaneous coronary intervention in haemodynamically stable patients with acute coronary syndromes: Analysis of over 4.400 patients in the EHS-PCI registry

被引:29
|
作者
Bauer, Timm [1 ,2 ]
Zeymer, Uwe [1 ]
Hochadel, Matthias [1 ]
Moellmann, Helge [2 ]
Weidinger, Franz [3 ]
Zahn, Ralf [1 ]
Nef, Holger M. [2 ]
Hamm, Christian W. [2 ]
Marco, Jean
Gitt, Anselm K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Heidelberg Univ, Inst Herzinfarktforsch Ludwigshafen, Herzzentrum Ludwigshafen, Heidelberg, Germany
[2] Max Planck Inst Physiol & Clin Res, Kerckhoff Klin, Bad Nauheim, Germany
[3] Krankenhaus Rudolfstiftung, Vienna, Austria
关键词
Percutaneous coronary intervention; Multi-vessel disease; Clinical practice; ACUTE MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION; ST-SEGMENT ELEVATION; MULTIVESSEL DISEASE; CULPRIT VESSEL; REVASCULARIZATION; CARDIOLOGY; SINGLE; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijcard.2011.11.024
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: The role of adhoc multi-vessel percutaneous coronary intervention (MV-PCI) in patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non ST elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS) has not fully defined yet. Therefore, we sought to evaluate the impact of MV-PCI on in-hospital outcome of patients with MV disease presenting with ACS. Methods and Results: We evaluated 4, 457 haemodynamically stable patients with ACS and at least two major epicardial vessels with >= 70% stenosis of the contemporary Euro Heart Survey PCI registry. They were stratified into four categories: 419 STEMI and 734 NSTE-ACS patients undergoing MV-PCI and 2,118 STEMI and 1,186 NSTE-ACS patients undergoing culprit lesion (CL)-PCI only, respectively. In comparison to patients with CL-PCI hospital mortality was numerically lower among those undergoing MV-PCI for STEMI (1.4 versus 3.4%, P=0.03) and for NSTE-ACS (1.1 versus 2.1%, P=0.10). After adjustment for confounding variables no significant mortality difference was observed among patients treated with MV-PCI for STEMI (OR 0.48, 95%-CI 0.21-1.13) and for NSTE-ACS (OR 0.54, 95%-CI 0.24-1.22). However, the risk for non-fatal postprocedural myocardial infarction was markedly increased among patients undergoing MV-PCI for STEMI (8.8 versus 1.6%, P < 0.0001) and for NSTE-ACS (5.3 versus 1.8%, P < 0.0001). Conclusions: In clinical practice MV-PCI in haemodynamically stable with ACS is used only in a minority of patients. There was no significant difference in hospital mortality between patients treated with MV- and CL-PCI, but MV-PCI was associated with a higher rate of postprocedural myocardial infarction. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:596 / 600
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] FRACTIONAL FLOW RESERVE GUIDED MULTI-VESSEL PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION VERSUS ANGIOGRAPHY-GUIDED CULPRIT LESION ONLY PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION FOR ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROMES: A META-ANALYSIS
    Kohli, Varun
    Khattak, Furqan Habib
    Paul, Timir
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2019, 73 (09) : 1195 - 1195
  • [22] Temporal trends of patients with acute coronary syndrome and multi-vessel coronary artery disease - from the ACSIS registry
    Shiyovich, Arthur
    Shlomo, Nir
    Cohen, Tal
    Iakobishvili, Zaza
    Kornowski, Ran
    Eisen, Alon
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2020, 304 : 8 - 13
  • [23] Impact of Multivessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention vs. Culprit Vessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes and Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease
    Yasuda, Kentaro
    Ogita, Manabu
    Tsuboi, Shuta
    Nishio, Ryota
    Takeuchi, Mitsuhiro
    Sonoda, Taketo
    Wada, Hideki
    Suwa, Satoru
    Miyauchi, Katsumi
    Daida, Hiroyuki
    Minamino, Tohru
    CARDIOVASCULAR REVASCULARIZATION MEDICINE, 2023, 53 : 38 - 44
  • [24] Multi-Vessel Disease Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease
    Abdelnabi, Mahmoud
    Almaghraby, Abdallah
    El Amrawy, Ahmed
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2020, 76 (17) : B69 - B69
  • [25] Multi-vessel disease percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with chronic kidney disease
    Abdelnabi, M. Hassan
    Almaghraby, A.
    El-Amrawy, A.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2020, 41 : 1516 - 1516
  • [26] BIOVASC trial in perspective: complete revascularization strategies in patients presenting with acute coronary syndromes and multi-vessel coronary disease
    Vranckx, Pascal
    van Diepen, Sean
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL-ACUTE CARDIOVASCULAR CARE, 2023, 12 (04) : 217 - 218
  • [27] The benefit of filter wire distal protection for native vessel percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes
    Hui, W
    Sleik, K
    Cheung, PK
    Brass, N
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2003, 92 (6A): : 167L - 167L
  • [28] IMPACT OF SUCCESSFUL PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION ON CHRONIC TOTAL OCCLUSION OUTCOMES IN MULTI-VESSEL DISEASE PATIENTS
    Rha, Seung-Woon
    Choi, Se Yeon
    Choi, Byoung Geol
    Byun, Jae Kyeong
    Mashaly, Ahmed
    Park, Yoonjee
    Jang, Won Young
    Kim, WooHyeun
    Park, Eun Jin
    Choi, Ja Yeon
    Na, Jin Oh
    Choi, Cheol Ung
    Lim, Hong Euy
    Kim, Eung Ju
    Park, Chang Gyu
    Seo, Hong-Seog
    Oh, Dong Joo
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2018, 71 (11) : 1274 - 1274
  • [29] Surgical Revascularization versus Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Optimal Medical Therapy in Diabetic Patients with Multi-Vessel Coronary Artery Disease
    Giustino, Gennaro
    Dangas, George D.
    PROGRESS IN CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES, 2015, 58 (03) : 306 - 315
  • [30] Multi-vessel intervention increased the risk of periprocedural myocardial injury in stable coronary artery disease patients
    Chen, Z. W.
    Qian, J. Y.
    Yang, H. B.
    Ma, J. Y.
    Ge, L.
    Ge, J. B.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2014, 35 : 124 - 125