Finding Mutual Benefit between Subjectivity Analysis and Information Extraction

被引:20
|
作者
Wiebe, Janyce [1 ]
Riloff, Ellen [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Comp Sci, Pittsburgh, PA 15211 USA
[2] Univ Utah, Sch Comp, Dept Comp Sci, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Natural language processing; text analysis;
D O I
10.1109/T-AFFC.2011.19
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
"Subjectivity analysis" systems automatically identify and extract information relating to attitudes, opinions, and sentiments from text. As more and more people make their opinions available on the Internet and as people increasingly consult the Internet to ascertain other people's opinions about products, political issues, and so on, the demand for effective subjectivity analysis systems continues to grow. Information extraction systems, which automatically identify and extract factual information relating to events of interest, remain critically important in this day and age of increasingly vast amounts of text available online. In this work, we discover that these research areas are mutually beneficial. Information extraction techniques may be used to learn informative clues of subjectivity. Then, by bootstrapping from a lexicon of subjectivity clues, we can build a subjective-objective sentence classifier that does not require annotated data as input. This classifier may then be used to improve information extraction performance, on data which have not been annotated for subjectivity, by improving precision.
引用
收藏
页码:175 / 191
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] On inequalities between mutual information and variation
    V. V. Prelov
    Problems of Information Transmission, 2007, 43 : 12 - 22
  • [22] Correlation between concurrence and mutual information
    Kwon, Yong
    Baek, Seung Ki
    Um, Jaegon
    JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL MECHANICS-THEORY AND EXPERIMENT, 2022, 2022 (09):
  • [23] Factors moderating the mutual impact of benefit finding between Chinese patients with cancer and their family caregivers: A cross-sectional study
    Li, Qiuping
    Lin, Yi
    Zhou, Huiya
    Xu, Yinghua
    Yang, Liping
    Xu, Yongyong
    PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2018, 27 (10) : 2363 - 2373
  • [24] Information flow in Deep Restricted Boltzmann Machines: An analysis of mutual information between inputs and outputs
    Vera, Matias
    Vega, Leonardo Rey
    Piantanida, Pablo
    NEUROCOMPUTING, 2022, 507 : 235 - 246
  • [25] Isotretinoin prescribing: finding a balance between benefit and risk
    Stern, RS
    PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2005, 14 (09) : 611 - 613
  • [26] Information discriminant feature extraction based on mutual information gradient optimal computation
    Xie, Wen-Biao
    Fan, Shao-Sheng
    Fei, Hong-Xiao
    Fan, Xiao-Ping
    Dianzi Yu Xinxi Xuebao/Journal of Electronics and Information Technology, 2009, 31 (12): : 2975 - 2979
  • [27] FINDING TARGET GROUPS FOR MUTUAL INSURANCE: WITH COMMUNITY EXTRACTION FROM SOCIAL NETWORKS
    Wei, Yuan
    Huang, Lele
    Wang, Huiwen
    ICIM2014: PROCEEDINGS OF THE TWELFTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT, 2014, : 321 - 326
  • [28] The Mutual Information based Correlation Analysis between Fault types and Monitor Data
    Huo Lin
    Lv Chuan
    Zhou Dong
    Fei Simiao
    CEIS 2011, 2011, 15
  • [29] Development of the benefit finding in multiple sclerosis (MS) caregiving scale: A longitudinal study of relations between benefit finding and adjustment
    Pakenham, Kenneth I.
    Cox, Stephen
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 13 : 583 - 602
  • [30] MUTUAL BENEFIT PROGRAM BETWEEN UNIVERSITY AND MENTAL-HOSPITAL
    BRADY, A
    PEABODY JOURNAL OF EDUCATION, 1963, 40 (06): : 348 - 352