Finding Mutual Benefit between Subjectivity Analysis and Information Extraction

被引:20
|
作者
Wiebe, Janyce [1 ]
Riloff, Ellen [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Comp Sci, Pittsburgh, PA 15211 USA
[2] Univ Utah, Sch Comp, Dept Comp Sci, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Natural language processing; text analysis;
D O I
10.1109/T-AFFC.2011.19
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
"Subjectivity analysis" systems automatically identify and extract information relating to attitudes, opinions, and sentiments from text. As more and more people make their opinions available on the Internet and as people increasingly consult the Internet to ascertain other people's opinions about products, political issues, and so on, the demand for effective subjectivity analysis systems continues to grow. Information extraction systems, which automatically identify and extract factual information relating to events of interest, remain critically important in this day and age of increasingly vast amounts of text available online. In this work, we discover that these research areas are mutually beneficial. Information extraction techniques may be used to learn informative clues of subjectivity. Then, by bootstrapping from a lexicon of subjectivity clues, we can build a subjective-objective sentence classifier that does not require annotated data as input. This classifier may then be used to improve information extraction performance, on data which have not been annotated for subjectivity, by improving precision.
引用
收藏
页码:175 / 191
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] On the relation between discriminant analysis and mutual information for supervised linear feature extraction
    Petridis, S
    Perantonis, SJ
    PATTERN RECOGNITION, 2004, 37 (05) : 857 - 874
  • [2] EMAIL ANALYSIS AND INFORMATION EXTRACTION FOR ENTERPRISE BENEFIT
    Laclavik, Michal
    Dlugolinsky, Stefan
    Seleng, Martin
    Kvassay, Marcel
    Gatial, Emil
    Balogh, Zoltan
    Hluchy, Ladislav
    COMPUTING AND INFORMATICS, 2011, 30 (01) : 57 - 87
  • [3] Information extraction and norms of mutual protection
    Bisin, Alberto
    Guaitoli, Danilo
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 2012, 84 (01) : 154 - 162
  • [4] On feature extraction by mutual information maximization
    Torkkola, K
    2002 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ACOUSTICS, SPEECH, AND SIGNAL PROCESSING, VOLS I-IV, PROCEEDINGS, 2002, : 821 - 824
  • [6] Factors moderating the mutual impact of benefit finding between Chinese adults with advanced cancer and their family caregivers
    Li, Qiuping
    Lin, Yi
    PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2018, 27 : 102 - 102
  • [7] Finding the Optimal Number of Features Based on Mutual Information
    Chen, Peipei
    Wilbik, Anna
    van Loon, Saskia
    Boer, Arjen-Kars
    Kaymak, Uzay
    ADVANCES IN FUZZY LOGIC AND TECHNOLOGY 2017, VOL 1, 2018, 641 : 477 - 486
  • [8] The Mutual Information between Graphs
    Escolano, Francisco
    Hancock, Edwin R.
    2014 22ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PATTERN RECOGNITION (ICPR), 2014, : 94 - 99
  • [9] The mutual information between graphs
    Escolano, Francisco
    Hancock, Edwin R.
    Lozano, Miguel A.
    Curado, Manuel
    PATTERN RECOGNITION LETTERS, 2017, 87 : 12 - 19
  • [10] Key frame extraction based on mutual information
    Lin Jian
    Xia Jing-bo
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2005 CHINESE CONTROL AND DECISION CONFERENCE, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2005, : 723 - 725