Cervical nerve root avulsion in brachial plexus injuries: magnetic resonance imaging classification and comparison with myelography and computerized tomography myelography

被引:95
|
作者
Doi, K
Otsuka, K
Okamoto, Y
Fujii, H
Hattori, Y
Baliarsing, AS
机构
[1] Ogori Daiichi Gen Hosp, Dept Orthoped Surg, Ogori, Yamaguchi 7540002, Japan
[2] Yamaguchi Univ, Sch Med, Dept Orthoped Surg, Ube, Yamaguchi 755, Japan
关键词
magnetic resonance imaging; computerized tomography myelography myelography; brachial plexus avulsion;
D O I
10.3171/spi.2002.96.3.0277
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Object. The authors describe a new magnetic resonance (MR) imaging technique to demonstrate the status of the cervical nerve roots involved in brachial plexus injury. They discuss the accuracy and reproducibility of a MR imaging-derived classification for diagnosis of nerve root avulsion compared with those of myeolgraphy combined with computerized tomography (CT) myelography. Methods. The overlapping coronal-oblique slice MR imaging procedure was per-formed in 35 patients with traumatic brachial plexus injury and 10 healthy individuals. The results were retrospectively evaluated and classified into four major categories (normal rootlet, rootlet injuries, avulsion, and meningocele) after confirming the diagnosis by surgical exploration with or without spinal evoked potential (EP) measurements and by referring to myelography and CT myelography findings. The reliability and reproducibility of the MR imaging-based classification was prospectively assessed by eight independent observers, and its diagnostic accuracy was compared with that of traditional myelography/CT myelography classification, correlated with surgical and spinal EP findings in another 50 cervical roots in 10 patients with traumatic brachial plexus injury. Conclusions. In the retrospective study in which MR imaging and myelography/CT myelography findings involving 175 cervical roots in 35 patients were compared, the sensitivity of detection of the cervical nerve root avulsion was the same (92.9%) with both modalities. In the prospective study, interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility showed that there was no statistically significant difference between MR imaging and myelography/CT myelography and that their accuracy for detecting cervical root avulsion was the same as that in the retrospective study. The overlapping coronal-oblique slice MR imaging technique is a reliable and reproducible method for detecting nerve root avulsion. The information provided by this modality enabled the authors to assess the roots of the brachial plexus and provided valuable data for helping to decide whether to proceed with exploration, nerve repair, primary reconstruction, or other imaging modalities.
引用
收藏
页码:277 / 284
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Assessment of the usefulness of X-ray myelography and magnetic resonance myelography, performed with an open low-field device, in diagnosing perinatal preganglionic injuries of the brachial plexus
    Gosk, Jerzy
    Hendrich, Barbara
    Wiacek, Roman
    Sasiadek, Marek
    Rutowski, Roman
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2012, 8 (04) : 678 - 683
  • [22] Detection of nerve rootlet avulsion on CT myelography in patients with birth palsy and brachial plexus injury after trauma
    Walker, AT
    Chaloupka, JC
    deLotbiniere, ACJ
    Wolfe, SW
    Goldman, R
    Kier, EL
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1996, 167 (05) : 1283 - 1287
  • [23] Magnetic resonance imaging of obstetrical brachial plexus injuries
    Abbott, R
    Abbott, M
    Alzate, J
    Lefton, D
    [J]. CHILDS NERVOUS SYSTEM, 2004, 20 (10) : 720 - 725
  • [24] Magnetic resonance imaging of obstetrical brachial plexus injuries
    Rick Abbott
    Matthew Abbott
    Juan Alzate
    Daniel Lefton
    [J]. Child's Nervous System, 2004, 20 : 720 - 725
  • [25] The imaging analysis of magnetic resonance myelography in disease of the lumbosacral nerve roots
    施鑫
    朱锡旭
    赵建宁
    [J]. 中国组织工程研究, 2003, (02) : 320 - 320
  • [26] Can recumbent magnetic resonance imaging replace myelography or computed tomography myelography for detecting lumbar spinal stenosis?
    Sasaki K.
    Hasegawa K.
    Shimoda H.
    Keiji I.
    Homma T.
    [J]. European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, 2013, 23 (Suppl 1) : S77 - S83
  • [27] SYRINGOMYELIA - MYELOGRAPHY, COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY, AND MAGNETIC-RESONANCE IMAGING
    DEEB, ZL
    DAFFNER, RH
    ROTHFUS, WE
    GOLDBERG, AL
    TABAS, JH
    WILBERGER, JE
    [J]. CT-JOURNAL OF COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY, 1988, 12 (01): : 1 - 8
  • [28] Concordance and discrepancy between Electrodiagnosis and magnetic resonance imaging in cervical root avulsion injuries
    Tsai, Po-Yi
    Chuang, Tien-Yow
    Cheng, Henrich
    Wu, Hsiu-Mei
    Chang, Yue-Cune
    Wang, Chih-Pin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROTRAUMA, 2006, 23 (08) : 1274 - 1281
  • [29] USE OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING TO DIAGNOSE BRACHIAL PLEXUS INJURIES
    Veronesi, Bruno Azevedo
    Rodrigues, Marcelo Bordalo
    Carrara de Sambuy, Marina Tommasini
    Macedo, Rodrigo Sousa
    Cho, Alvaro Baik
    de Rezende, Marcelo Rosa
    [J]. ACTA ORTOPEDICA BRASILEIRA, 2018, 26 (02): : 131 - 134
  • [30] RADIOGRAPHY, MYELOGRAPHY, COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY, AND MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING OF THE SPINE
    SANDE, RD
    [J]. VETERINARY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA-SMALL ANIMAL PRACTICE, 1992, 22 (04) : 811 - 831