External validation of a percutaneous coronary intervention mortality prediction model in patients with acute coronary syndromes

被引:9
|
作者
Hubacek, J
Galbraith, PD
Gao, M
Humphries, K
Graham, MM
Knudtson, ML
Ghali, WA
机构
[1] Univ Calgary, Fac Med, Dept Med, Calgary, AB T2N 4N1, Canada
[2] APPROACH, Calgary, AB, Canada
[3] APPROACH, Edmonton, AB, Canada
[4] Univ Alberta, Dept Med, Edmonton, AB T6G 2M7, Canada
[5] British Columbia Cardiac Registries, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[6] Univ British Columbia, Dept Med, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.ahj.2005.04.032
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background The recently published Michigan outcome prediction model (MM) for inhospital mortality was developed and validated on a series of consecutive patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Our purpose was to externally validate the performance of the MM in 2 separate cohorts of patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) undergoing PCI in Canada. Methods A validation of the MM and development of an extended MM were performed on data describing 10050 patients from the APPROACH prospective cohort study between January 1995 and December 2000. Performance of both models was assessed on an external data set of 3259 PCI cases from the British Columbia Cardiac Registries. Only patients with a diagnosis of ACS were included in the study. Results The original MM predicted death rates ranging from 0.1% to 60.6%, but lacked accuracy to predict inhospital mortality as severity increased. The extended MM predicted death rates more widely from 0.0% to a high of 91.0% with better accuracy to predict inhospital death in patients with ACS undergoing PCI. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the MM and the extended MM on the external validation data set were 0.93. and 0.95, respectively. Conclusion The MM predicts death after PCI in patients with ACS and identifies a clear gradient of risk. However, the enhanced MM developed specifically for the subset of patients with ACS demonstrated better prediction and cross-validated performance. These prediction rules can be useful for risk-adjustment analyses and for prognostication for individual patients.
引用
收藏
页码:308 / 315
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Machine learning prediction of one-year mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention in acute coronary syndrome patients
    Hosseini, Kaveh
    Behnoush, Amir Hossein
    Khalaji, Amirmohammad
    Etemadi, Ali
    Soleimani, Hamidreza
    Pasebani, Yeganeh
    Jenab, Yaser
    Masoudkabir, Farzad
    Tajdini, Masih
    Mehrani, Mehdi
    Nanna, Michael G.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2024, 409
  • [42] Machine learning prediction of one-year mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention in acute coronary syndrome patients
    Hosseini, Kaveh
    Behnoush, Amir Hossein
    Khalaji, Amirmohammad
    Etemadi, Ali
    Soleimani, Hamidreza
    Pasebani, Yeganeh
    Jenab, Yaser
    Masoudkabir, Farzad
    Tajdini, Masih
    Mehrani, Mehdi
    Nanna, Michael G.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2024, 409
  • [43] PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION IN PATIENTS WITH ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME
    Carter, Paul
    Baig, Mudassar
    Mavi, Jaskaran
    Ali, Noman
    Aziz, Amir
    Uppal, Hardeep
    Chandran, Suresh
    Sarma, Jaydeep
    Potluri, Rahul
    HEART, 2016, 102 : A15 - A16
  • [44] Mortality prediction algorithms for patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention
    Hizoh, Istvan
    Domokos, Dominika
    Banhegyi, Gyongyver
    Becker, David
    Merkely, Bela
    Ruzsa, Zoltan
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC DISEASE, 2020, 12 (04) : 1706 - 1720
  • [45] Acute coronary syndromes and coronary intervention
    Luescher, Thomas F.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2015, 36 (06) : 323 - 324
  • [46] Contemporary outcomes in women undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndromes
    Al-Fiadh, Ali H.
    Andrianopoulos, Nick
    Farouque, Omar
    Yan, Bryan P.
    Duffy, Stephen J.
    Charter, Kerrie
    Tongyoo, Surat
    New, Gishel
    Yip, Thomas
    Brennan, Angela
    Proimos, George
    Reid, Christopher M.
    Ajani, Andrew E.
    Clark, David J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2011, 151 (02) : 195 - 199
  • [47] Controversies of oral antiplatelet therapy in acute coronary syndromes and percutaneous coronary intervention
    Rajagopal, V
    Bhatt, DL
    SEMINARS IN THROMBOSIS AND HEMOSTASIS, 2004, 30 (06): : 649 - 655
  • [48] Bivalirudin in Acute Coronary Syndromes and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Should We Use It?
    Ten, Yuli
    Devlin, Gerard
    HEART LUNG AND CIRCULATION, 2013, 22 (10): : 793 - 800
  • [49] Heparin and Bivalirudin in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Acute Coronary Syndromes: A Review Article
    Wang, Guiping
    Qi, Kaijie
    Li, Xuyang
    Zuo, Shuping
    Zhang, Ruolin
    Zhao, Yanan
    Sun, Suya
    Zhang, Juanjuan
    Liu, Xiaokun
    CARDIOVASCULAR THERAPEUTICS, 2024, 2024 (01)
  • [50] Invasive mechanical ventilation in acute coronary syndromes in the era of percutaneous coronary intervention
    Ariza Sole, Albert
    Salazar-Mendiguchia, Joel
    Lorente-Tordera, Victoria
    Sanchez-Salado, Jose C.
    Gonzalez-Costello, Jose
    Moliner-Borja, Pedro
    Gomez-Hospital, Joan A.
    Manito-Lorite, Nicolas
    Cequier-Fillat, Angel
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL-ACUTE CARDIOVASCULAR CARE, 2013, 2 (02) : 109 - 117