Measuring eco-efficiency of contaminated soil management at the regional level

被引:18
|
作者
Kielenniva, Nea [2 ]
Antikainen, Riina [1 ]
Sorvari, Jaana [1 ]
机构
[1] Finnish Environm Inst, Helsinki 00251, Finland
[2] City Helsinki, Publ Works Dept, Helsinki 00099, Finland
关键词
Contaminated soil; Eco-efficiency; Finland; Indicator; Region; Risk management; Sustainability; SITE REMEDIATION OPTIONS; LIFE-CYCLE FRAMEWORK; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS; BENEFITS; COSTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.07.019
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Eco-efficiency and sustainable development are the key environmental topics and goals for today's society that we should strive for in all activities, including contaminated soil management (CSM). However, particularly at the regional level, CSM is studied to a lesser extent from this perspective and practical means to monitor and assess sustainability or eco-efficiency are not widely available. This study aims to fill this gap by developing indicators to measure and monitor the development of regional eco-efficiency of CSM. The indicators can be used to support decision-making at the regional level since many CSM decisions, such as prioritisation of sites and the number of soil treatment and storing facilities, are made regionally. To start with, we surveyed the methods available for determining eco-efficiency and suitable indicators to monitor and measure the development of CSM regionally. We used life cycle analysis (LCA) and material flow analysis (MFA) to identify factors that the environmental indicators should cover, and also involved economic indicators. We ended up with a selection of 28 indicators, which can be classed into three different categories: background indicators, environmental indicators and economic indicators. We further demonstrated the use of the indicators by applying data from three different regions in Finland, and evaluated their suitability. On the basis of the results we recommended 15 indicators for continuous follow-up and decision-making purposes. Even though these indicators are suitable for monitoring and measuring the eco-efficiency of CSM at the regional level, unfortunately we found several data gaps related to the actual remediation projects which impede their use in practice. The data collection practices therefore need to be regionally developed. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:179 / 188
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Eco-efficiency and environmental marketing
    Riebel, P
    [J]. PULP & PAPER-CANADA, 1999, 100 (11) : 54 - 54
  • [42] An eco-efficiency model for golf
    Bekken, Michael A. H.
    Mitchell, Paul D.
    Soldat, Douglas J.
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2024, 166
  • [43] Approaches to the measurement of eco-efficiency
    Böhm, B
    [J]. SOR 05 Proceedings, 2005, : 3 - 9
  • [44] A Model of Eco-Efficiency and Recycling
    Cogoy, Mario
    [J]. ECONOMICS-THE OPEN ACCESS OPEN-ASSESSMENT E-JOURNAL, 2009, 3
  • [45] A framework for eco-efficiency of C&D waste management
    Yuan, Hongping
    Huang, Ziyou
    Xu, Pengpeng
    [J]. SELECTED PROCEEDINGS OF THE TENTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON WASTE MANAGEMENT AND TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 31 : 855 - 859
  • [46] Eco-efficiency and dairy processing
    Prasad, Penny
    Pagan, Bob
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF DAIRY TECHNOLOGY, 2006, 61 (03) : 231 - 237
  • [47] Is There a Convergence in Eco-Efficiency in the EU?
    Nezinsky, Eduard
    [J]. INNOVATION VISION 2020: FROM REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT SUSTAINABILITY TO GLOBAL ECONOMIC GROWTH, VOL I-VI, 2015, : 3328 - 3337
  • [48] Eco-efficiency and firm value
    Sinkin, Charlene
    Wright, Charlotte J.
    Burnett, Royce D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING AND PUBLIC POLICY, 2008, 27 (02) : 167 - 176
  • [49] Eco-efficiency gains a foothold
    Buzzelli, D
    [J]. CHEMICAL PROCESSING, 1999, 62 (02): : 33 - +
  • [50] Eco-efficiency and its terminology
    Huppes, G
    Ishikawa, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY, 2005, 9 (04) : 43 - 46