The effect of dental restorative materials on dental biofilm

被引:125
|
作者
Auschill, TM
Arweiler, NB
Brecx, M
Reich, E
Sculean, A
Netuschil, L
机构
[1] Univ Freiburg, Dept Operat Dent & Periodontol, D-79106 Freiburg, Germany
[2] Dresden Univ Technol, Med Fac Carl Gustav Carus, Dept Conservat Dent, D-8027 Dresden, Germany
[3] Univ Saarland, Dept Periodontol & Conservat Dent, D-6650 Homburg, Germany
关键词
dental biofilm; biofilm vitality; confocal laser scanning microscope (CLSM); dental materials;
D O I
10.1046/j.0909-8836.2001.101160.x
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
To investigate the arrangement of biofilms formed in vivo, volunteers wore splints with slabs of six different dental materials inserted to collect smooth surface plaque. After 5 d of undisturbed plaque accumulation, the specimens were vital stained and analyzed by the confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) to evaluate the percentage of vital biofilm microflora (VF percentage). Further parameters were the area of the specimens covered by plaque (surface coatings SC, %) and the height of the biofilms (BH, mum). The metals amalgam and gold, the compomer, as well as the glass-ionomer cement harboured an almost entirely dead biofilm (VF <8%). Resin composite led to vitality values between 4 and 21%, while a very thin biofilm on ceramic revealed the highest vitality values (34 86%). SC varied from 6% on glass-ionomer cement to 100% on amalgam. BH reached its highest value on amalgam and gold of 17 and 11 mum, respectively, while heights of between 1 and 6 mum were found on the ceramic, resin composite, compomer and the glass-ionomer cement. Within their limits, the present findings indicate that amalgam, gold, compomer and glass-ionomer cement exert an influence against the adhering biofilm. No general relationship could be established between the different parameters VF percentage, SC percentage and BH (mum).
引用
收藏
页码:48 / 53
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Antibacterial effect of dental restorative materials containing Ag
    Yutani, H
    Ohashi, S
    Yamamoto, K
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1997, 76 : 2496 - 2496
  • [22] Dental restorative composite materials: A review
    Yadav, Ramkumar
    Kumar, Mukesh
    JOURNAL OF ORAL BIOSCIENCES, 2019, 61 (02) : 78 - 83
  • [23] Dental Restorative Materials for Elderly Populations
    Huang, Yuyao
    Song, Bingqing
    Zhou, Xuedong
    Chen, Hui
    Wang, Haohao
    Cheng, Lei
    POLYMERS, 2021, 13 (05) : 1 - 14
  • [24] WEAR TESTING OF DENTAL RESTORATIVE MATERIALS
    VOWLES, RW
    WILLIAMS, DF
    LOCKWOOD, M
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1988, 67 (04) : 659 - 659
  • [25] Wear Behavior of Dental Restorative Materials
    Sen, Sadri
    Zamanlou, Hamid
    Karabudak, Filiz
    Sukuroglu, Ebru Emine
    JOURNAL OF THE CHINESE SOCIETY OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS, 2023, 44 (02): : 193 - 201
  • [26] PLAQUE GROWTH ON DENTAL RESTORATIVE MATERIALS
    SMALES, RJ
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1981, 60 : 1062 - 1062
  • [27] CHANGING TRENDS OF DENTAL RESTORATIVE MATERIALS
    PHILLIPS, RW
    DENTAL CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 1989, 33 (02) : 285 - 291
  • [28] Go on a restorative dental materials journey
    不详
    BRITISH DENTAL JOURNAL, 2017, 223 (11) : 859 - 859
  • [29] ANTIBACTERIAL ACTIVITY OF DENTAL RESTORATIVE MATERIALS
    TOBIAS, RS
    BROWNE, RM
    WILSON, CA
    INTERNATIONAL ENDODONTIC JOURNAL, 1985, 18 (03) : 161 - 171
  • [30] Fracture toughness of dental restorative materials
    Ilie, Nicoleta
    Hickel, Reinhard
    Valceanu, Anca Silvia
    Huth, Karin Christine
    CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2012, 16 (02) : 489 - 498