China's new rural "separating three property rights" land reform results in grassland degradation: Evidence from Inner Mongolia

被引:89
|
作者
Li, Ang [1 ]
Wu, Jianguo [2 ,3 ]
Zhang, Xueyao [1 ,4 ]
Xue, Jianguo [1 ]
Liu, Zhifeng [2 ]
Han, Xingguo [1 ]
Huang, Jianhui [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Bot, State Key Lab Vegetat & Environm Change, Beijing 100093, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Normal Univ, CHESS, State Key Lab Earth Surface Proc & Resource Ecol, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China
[3] Arizona State Univ, Sch Life Sci, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
[4] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, 19A Yuquan Rd, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Payment for ecosystem services; Grassland rental; Grassland degradation; Ecosystem services; Cooperative; Rangeland ecology; LITTER DECOMPOSITION; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; SOIL CARBON; MANAGEMENT; SEQUESTRATION; INSTITUTIONS; ADAPTATION; POLICIES; IMPACTS; GROWTH;
D O I
10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.11.052
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
China is currently implementing the "separating three property rights" (STPR) reform to consolidate rural land. This reform divides rural land property rights into three components: nontradable ownership, nontradable contractual rights and tradable land use rights. The STPR reform adopts the rental of grassland use rights, a market-oriented approach, as the main arrangement for grassland consolidation. However, this arrangement may undermine the cornerstones of grassland restoration, which are the security of grassland property and payments for ecosystem services (PES) policies. As an alternative to the market-oriented approach, cooperatives are also encouraged to consolidate grassland use rights. We used a natural experiment approach to systematically examine how two different land consolidation arrangements affected key grassland ecosystem services in Inner Mongolia. In rented grasslands, all ecosystem services except provisioning services degenerated severely. Traded grassland use rights were perceived as insecure, which led to predatory land use by tenants. In contrast, cooperative-managed grasslands showed no serious degradation in ecosystem services. However, these cooperatives limited their group size by chief kinship to avoid the free-rider problem; thus, they are unlikely to become a primary channel of grassland consolidation. Because PES policy subsidies are still allocated to grassland contractors rather than to tenants, these policies are irrelevant to the conservation of rented grasslands. Based on our analysis, we suggest several ways to improve this new rural land property reform to avoid a major wave of grassland degradation in China.
引用
收藏
页码:170 / 182
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Cooperative Property Rights and Agricultural Development: Evidence from Land Reform in El Salvador
    Montero, Eduardo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC HISTORY, 2018, 78 (02): : 621 - 622
  • [32] Does Property Rights Integrity Improve Tenure Security? Evidence from China's Forest Reform
    Zhou, Yuepeng
    Ma, Xianlei
    Ji, Dengyan
    Heerink, Nico
    Shi, Xiaoping
    Liu, Hongbin
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 10 (06):
  • [33] The Demsetz's Evolutionary Theory of Property Rights as Applied to Rural Land of China: A Supplement
    Zhang, Yanlong
    [J]. LAND, 2021, 10 (09)
  • [34] Property rights and fertilizing practices in rural China -: Evidence from northern Jiangsu
    Kung, JKS
    Cai, YS
    [J]. MODERN CHINA, 2000, 26 (03): : 276 - 308
  • [35] Research on China's rural land market reform with the perspective of modern property right theory
    Tian Yuan
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2019 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FINANCIAL INNOVATION AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT (ICFIED 2019), 2019, 76 : 143 - 146
  • [36] Land Property Rights, Spatial Form, and Land Performance: A Framework of Policy Performance Evaluation on Collective-Owned Construction Land and Evidence from Rural China
    Xu, Gaofeng
    Liu, Jian
    Zhang, Min
    [J]. LAND, 2024, 13 (07)
  • [37] Property rights system and market evolution: Plot-level evidence from China's land titling
    Xu, Jinhai
    Zeng, Junming
    Hu, Yuan
    [J]. LAND USE POLICY, 2024, 145
  • [38] Property rights, village democracy, and household forestry income: evidence from China's collective forest tenure reform
    Yang, Liu
    Ren, Yang
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH, 2021, 26 (01) : 7 - 16
  • [39] Property rights, tenure security and forest investment incentives: evidence from China's Collective Forest Tenure Reform
    Yi, Yuanyuan
    Kohlin, Gunnar
    Xu, Jintao
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2014, 19 (01) : 48 - 73
  • [40] Property Rights, Village Political System, and Forestry Investment: Evidence from China's Collective Forest Tenure Reform
    Ren, Yang
    Kuuluvainen, Jari
    Yang, Liu
    Yao, Shunbo
    Xue, Caixia
    Toppinen, Anne
    [J]. FORESTS, 2018, 9 (09)