China's new rural "separating three property rights" land reform results in grassland degradation: Evidence from Inner Mongolia

被引:89
|
作者
Li, Ang [1 ]
Wu, Jianguo [2 ,3 ]
Zhang, Xueyao [1 ,4 ]
Xue, Jianguo [1 ]
Liu, Zhifeng [2 ]
Han, Xingguo [1 ]
Huang, Jianhui [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Bot, State Key Lab Vegetat & Environm Change, Beijing 100093, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Normal Univ, CHESS, State Key Lab Earth Surface Proc & Resource Ecol, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China
[3] Arizona State Univ, Sch Life Sci, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
[4] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, 19A Yuquan Rd, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Payment for ecosystem services; Grassland rental; Grassland degradation; Ecosystem services; Cooperative; Rangeland ecology; LITTER DECOMPOSITION; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; SOIL CARBON; MANAGEMENT; SEQUESTRATION; INSTITUTIONS; ADAPTATION; POLICIES; IMPACTS; GROWTH;
D O I
10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.11.052
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
China is currently implementing the "separating three property rights" (STPR) reform to consolidate rural land. This reform divides rural land property rights into three components: nontradable ownership, nontradable contractual rights and tradable land use rights. The STPR reform adopts the rental of grassland use rights, a market-oriented approach, as the main arrangement for grassland consolidation. However, this arrangement may undermine the cornerstones of grassland restoration, which are the security of grassland property and payments for ecosystem services (PES) policies. As an alternative to the market-oriented approach, cooperatives are also encouraged to consolidate grassland use rights. We used a natural experiment approach to systematically examine how two different land consolidation arrangements affected key grassland ecosystem services in Inner Mongolia. In rented grasslands, all ecosystem services except provisioning services degenerated severely. Traded grassland use rights were perceived as insecure, which led to predatory land use by tenants. In contrast, cooperative-managed grasslands showed no serious degradation in ecosystem services. However, these cooperatives limited their group size by chief kinship to avoid the free-rider problem; thus, they are unlikely to become a primary channel of grassland consolidation. Because PES policy subsidies are still allocated to grassland contractors rather than to tenants, these policies are irrelevant to the conservation of rented grasslands. Based on our analysis, we suggest several ways to improve this new rural land property reform to avoid a major wave of grassland degradation in China.
引用
收藏
页码:170 / 182
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Land tenure reform and grassland degradation in Inner Mongolia, China
    Liu, Min
    Dries, Liesbeth
    Heijman, Wim
    Zhu, Xueqin
    Deng, Xiangzheng
    Huang, Jikun
    [J]. CHINA ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2019, 55 : 181 - 198
  • [2] Property rights and grassland degradation: A study of the Xilingol Pasture, Inner Mongolia, China
    Li, Wen Jun
    Ali, Saleem H.
    Zhang, Qian
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2007, 85 (02) : 461 - 470
  • [3] Land property rights and rural enterprise growth: Evidence from land titling reform in China
    Bu, Di
    Liao, Yin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2022, 157
  • [4] Property rights, social change, and grassland degradation in Xilingol Biosphere Reserve, Inner Mongolia, China
    Thwaites, R
    De Lacy, T
    Hong, LY
    Hua, LX
    [J]. SOCIETY & NATURAL RESOURCES, 1998, 11 (04) : 319 - 338
  • [5] Dilemmas and theoretical exploration of China's rural land property rights system reform
    Zhou, Laiyou
    Luo, Jiawei
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN SUSTAINABLE FOOD SYSTEMS, 2023, 7
  • [6] China Rural Land Property Rights Reform: The Choice Based on Interests Conflicts
    Cheng Shi-yong
    Wu Wen-yan
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF 2015 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION (11TH) VOL I, 2015, : 1147 - 1158
  • [7] Are private property rights better? evidence from the marketization of land rentals in rural China
    Tongwei Qiu
    Xianlei Ma
    Biliang Luo
    [J]. Economic Change and Restructuring, 2022, 55 : 875 - 902
  • [8] Are private property rights better? evidence from the marketization of land rentals in rural China
    Qiu, Tongwei
    Ma, Xianlei
    Luo, Biliang
    [J]. ECONOMIC CHANGE AND RESTRUCTURING, 2022, 55 (02) : 875 - 902
  • [9] Common property rights and land reallocations in rural China: Evidence from a village survey
    Kung, JKS
    [J]. WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2000, 28 (04) : 701 - 719
  • [10] Property rights and market participation: evidence from the land titling program in rural China
    He, Dongwei
    Zhang, Guangcai
    You, Kai
    Wu, Jun
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHINESE GOVERNANCE, 2023, 8 (01) : 110 - 133