Three Different Phenotypes of Mild Nonproliferative Diabetic Retinopathy With Different Risks for Development of Clinically Significant Macular Edema

被引:46
|
作者
Nunes, Sandrina [1 ,2 ]
Ribeiro, Luisa [1 ,2 ]
Lobo, Conceicao [1 ,2 ]
Cunha-Vaz, Jose [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Assoc Innovat & Biomed Res Light & Image AIBILI, Coimbra, Portugal
[2] Univ Coimbra, Fac Med, Coimbra, Portugal
关键词
cluster analysis; phenotypes; diabetic retinopathy; OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; CLUSTER-ANALYSIS; MICROANEURYSM TURNOVER; RETINAL THICKNESS; VISUAL-ACUITY; TYPE-2; CLASSIFICATION; MELLITUS;
D O I
10.1167/iovs.13-11895
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
PURPOSE. To identify different phenotypes of nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) and their progression to clinically significant macular edema (CSME). METHODS. A prospective observational study was designed to follow eyes/patients with diabetes type 2 and NPDR with no prior laser treatment for 2 years or until development of CSME. A total of 410 patients, one eye per patient, fulfilled the inclusion/exclusion criteria and were included in the study. Ophthalmological examinations, including BCVA, fundus photography with Retmarker analysis, and optical coherence tomography (OCT), were performed at baseline, month 6 and month 24, or before laser treatment. Hierarchical cluster analysis was used to identify homogeneous subgroups and clinically significant thresholds of the data collected. RESULTS. A total of 376 eyes/patients performed the 6-month visit and were considered for cluster analysis. This mathematical method identified three different phenotypes based on statistically significant differences for the microaneurysm (MA) turnover and for the central retinal thickness (RT): phenotype A (low MA turnover and normal RT, 48.1%); phenotype B (low MA turnover and increased central RT, 23.2%); and phenotype C (high MA turnover, 28.7%). From the 348 eyes/patients that reached the study end point or completed the 24-month visit, 26 developed CSME: 3 from phenotype A (1.8%), 7 from phenotype B (8.5%), and 16 from phenotype C (16.2%). Eyes/patients from phenotype C showed a higher risk for CSME development (OR 3.536; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS. Hierarchical cluster analysis identifies three different phenotypes of NPDR based on MA turnover and central macular thickness. Eyes/patients from phenotype C show a higher risk for the development of CSME. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00763802.)
引用
收藏
页码:4595 / 4604
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Systemic risk factors contribute differently to the development of proliferative diabetic retinopathy and clinically significant macular edema
    Bek, Toke
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2020, 61 (07)
  • [12] Characterization of two-year progression of different phenotypes of nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy
    Ribeiro, Luisa
    Marques, Ines P.
    Santos, Torcato
    Carvalho, Sara
    Santos, Ana R. R.
    Mendes, Luis
    Lobo, Conceicao
    Cunha-Vaz, Jose
    [J]. OPHTHALMIC RESEARCH, 2023, 66 (01) : 228 - 237
  • [13] Retinal images benchmark for the detection of diabetic retinopathy and clinically significant macular edema (CSME)
    Noor-ul-huda, Muhammad
    Tehsin, Samabia
    Ahmed, Sairam
    Niazi, Fuad A. K.
    Murtaza, Zeerish
    [J]. BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING-BIOMEDIZINISCHE TECHNIK, 2019, 64 (03): : 297 - 307
  • [14] The Comparison of Contrast Sensitivity after Three Different Treatment Modalities for Clinically Significant Macular Edema
    Farahvash, Mohammad Sadegh
    Aslani, Asieh
    Faghihi, Hooshang
    Ghaffari, Elina
    Mirshahi, Ahmad
    Faghihi, Shahin
    Pour, Soheil Fallah
    Khabazkhoob, Mehdi
    [J]. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2010, 22 (04): : 66 - 72
  • [15] Characterization of two-year occurrence of subclinical macular edema in different risk phenotypes of diabetic retinopathy
    Santos, Torcato
    Marques, Ines Pereira
    Ribeiro, Maria Luisa
    Ferreira, Sonia
    Santos, Ana Rita
    Cunha-Vaz, Jose G.
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2022, 63 (07)
  • [16] Patterns of retinopathy progression in a five-year follow-up of mild nonproliferative retinopathy in diabetes type 2: Development of clinically signigicant macular edema
    Azevedo, H
    Duarte, L
    Nunes, S
    Bernardes, R
    Lobo, C
    Figueira, J
    Cunha-Vaz, J
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2005, 46
  • [17] Prediction of macular edema exacerbation after phacoemulsification in patients with nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy
    Funatsu, H
    Yamashita, H
    Noma, H
    Shimizu, E
    Mimura, T
    Hori, S
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2002, 28 (08): : 1355 - 1363
  • [18] Nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy and macular edema progression after phacoemulsification:: Prospective study
    Romero-Aroca, Pedro
    Fernandez-Ballart, Juan
    Almena-Garcia, Matias
    Mendez-Marin, Isabel
    Salvat-Serra, Merce
    Buil-Calvo, Jose A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2006, 32 (09): : 1438 - 1444
  • [19] Diabetic papillopathy with macular star mimicking clinically significant diabetic macular edema
    Friedrich, Y
    Feiner, M
    Gawi, H
    Friedman, Z
    [J]. RETINA-THE JOURNAL OF RETINAL AND VITREOUS DISEASES, 2001, 21 (01): : 80 - 82
  • [20] Characterization of degenerative clinically significant diabetic macular edema
    Pretzl, Josef
    Priglinger, Siegfried
    Klaida, Nicole
    Bolz, Matthias
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2014, 55 (13)