Three Different Phenotypes of Mild Nonproliferative Diabetic Retinopathy With Different Risks for Development of Clinically Significant Macular Edema

被引:46
|
作者
Nunes, Sandrina [1 ,2 ]
Ribeiro, Luisa [1 ,2 ]
Lobo, Conceicao [1 ,2 ]
Cunha-Vaz, Jose [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Assoc Innovat & Biomed Res Light & Image AIBILI, Coimbra, Portugal
[2] Univ Coimbra, Fac Med, Coimbra, Portugal
关键词
cluster analysis; phenotypes; diabetic retinopathy; OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; CLUSTER-ANALYSIS; MICROANEURYSM TURNOVER; RETINAL THICKNESS; VISUAL-ACUITY; TYPE-2; CLASSIFICATION; MELLITUS;
D O I
10.1167/iovs.13-11895
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
PURPOSE. To identify different phenotypes of nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) and their progression to clinically significant macular edema (CSME). METHODS. A prospective observational study was designed to follow eyes/patients with diabetes type 2 and NPDR with no prior laser treatment for 2 years or until development of CSME. A total of 410 patients, one eye per patient, fulfilled the inclusion/exclusion criteria and were included in the study. Ophthalmological examinations, including BCVA, fundus photography with Retmarker analysis, and optical coherence tomography (OCT), were performed at baseline, month 6 and month 24, or before laser treatment. Hierarchical cluster analysis was used to identify homogeneous subgroups and clinically significant thresholds of the data collected. RESULTS. A total of 376 eyes/patients performed the 6-month visit and were considered for cluster analysis. This mathematical method identified three different phenotypes based on statistically significant differences for the microaneurysm (MA) turnover and for the central retinal thickness (RT): phenotype A (low MA turnover and normal RT, 48.1%); phenotype B (low MA turnover and increased central RT, 23.2%); and phenotype C (high MA turnover, 28.7%). From the 348 eyes/patients that reached the study end point or completed the 24-month visit, 26 developed CSME: 3 from phenotype A (1.8%), 7 from phenotype B (8.5%), and 16 from phenotype C (16.2%). Eyes/patients from phenotype C showed a higher risk for CSME development (OR 3.536; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS. Hierarchical cluster analysis identifies three different phenotypes of NPDR based on MA turnover and central macular thickness. Eyes/patients from phenotype C show a higher risk for the development of CSME. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00763802.)
引用
收藏
页码:4595 / 4604
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Different Phenotypes of Mild Nonproliferative Diabetic Retinopathy with Different Risks for Development of Macular Edema (C-TRACER Study)
    Ribeiro, Luisa
    Pappuru, Rajeev
    Lobo, Conceicao
    Alves, Dalila
    Cunha-Vaz, Jose
    [J]. OPHTHALMIC RESEARCH, 2018, 59 (02) : 59 - 67
  • [2] Microaneurysm Turnover and Phenotypes of Nonproliferative Diabetic Retinopathy Progression to Clinically Significant Macular Edema
    Cunha-Vaz, J.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON OCULAR PHARMACOLOGY AND THERAPEUTICS, 2013, : 51 - 54
  • [3] Microaneurysm Turnover at the Macula Predicts Risk of Development of Clinically Significant Macular Edema in Persons With Mild Nonproliferative Diabetic Retinopathy
    Ribeiro, Maria Luisa
    Nunes, Sandrina G.
    Cunha-Vaz, Jose G.
    [J]. DIABETES CARE, 2013, 36 (05) : 1254 - 1259
  • [4] Predicting the development of clinically significant macular edema (CSME) in patients with mild nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) using machine learning (ML)
    Damopoulos, Dimitrios
    Mendes, Luis
    Santos, Torcato
    Neubert, Ales
    Armendariz, Beatriz Garcia
    Weikert, Robert
    Ferrara, Daniela
    Cunha-Vaz, Jose G.
    Benmansour, Fethallah
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2021, 62 (08)
  • [5] MICROANEURYSM FORMATION RATE AS A PREDICTIVE MARKER FOR PROGRESSION TO CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT MACULAR EDEMA IN NONPROLIFERATIVE DIABETIC RETINOPATHY
    Haritoglou, Christos
    Kernt, Marcus
    Neubauer, Aljoscha
    Gerss, Joachim
    Oliveira, Carlos Manta
    Kampik, Anselm
    Ulbig, Michael
    [J]. RETINA-THE JOURNAL OF RETINAL AND VITREOUS DISEASES, 2014, 34 (01): : 157 - 164
  • [6] Microaneurysm Turnover Is a Biomarker for Diabetic Retinopathy Progression to Clinically Significant Macular Edema: Findings for Type 2 Diabetics with Nonproliferative Retinopathy
    Nunes, Sandrina
    Pires, Isabel
    Rosa, Andreia
    Duarte, Lilianne
    Bernardes, Rui
    Cunha-Vaz, Jose
    [J]. OPHTHALMOLOGICA, 2009, 223 (05) : 292 - 297
  • [7] Retinopathy Phenotypes in Type 2 Diabetes with Different Risks for Macular Edema and Proliferative Retinopathy
    Marques, Ines P.
    Madeira, Maria H.
    Messias, Ana L.
    Santos, Torcato
    Martinho, Antonio C-V.
    Figueira, Joao
    Cunha-Vaz, Jose
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2020, 9 (05)
  • [8] Correlation between different retinal layers with visual acuity in diabetic retinopathy patients with clinically significant macular edema
    Parveen, Shama
    Mishra, Deepak
    Gurnani, Bharat
    Kaur, Kirandeep
    Ziada, Hossameldin
    Srivastav, Tanmay
    Bhushan, Prashant
    [J]. INDIAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2023, 71 (06) : 2526 - 2530
  • [9] Diabetic retinopathy with or without clinically significant macular edema: The influencing factors
    Suwal, Barsha
    Shrestha, Jeevan Kumar
    Joshi, Sagun Narayan
    Sharma, Ananda Kumar
    [J]. NEPALESE JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2015, 7 (02) : 142 - 147
  • [10] Foveal cone function in nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy and macular edema
    Weiner, A
    Christopoulos, VA
    Gussler, CH
    Adams, DH
    Kaufman, SR
    Kohn, HD
    Weidenthal, DT
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 1997, 38 (07) : 1443 - 1449