Uncertainty Quantification of Global Net Methane Emissions From Terrestrial Ecosystems Using a Mechanistically Based Biogeochemistry Model

被引:18
|
作者
Liu, Licheng [1 ]
Zhuang, Qianlai [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Oh, Youmi [1 ]
Shurpali, Narasinha J. [4 ]
Kim, Seungbum [5 ]
Poulter, Ben [6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Purdue Univ, Dept Earth Atmospher Planetary Sci, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
[2] Purdue Univ, Dept Agron, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
[3] Purdue Climate Change Res Ctr, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
[4] Univ Eastern Finland, Dept Environm Sci, Kuopio, Finland
[5] CALTECH, Jet Prop Lab, Pasadena, CA USA
[6] Montana State Univ, Dept Ecol, Bozeman, MT 59717 USA
[7] NASA, Goddard Space Flight Ctr, Biospher Sci Lab, Greenbelt, MD USA
关键词
wetland methane emission; biogeochemistry modeling; uncertainty analysis; global modeling; NATURAL WETLANDS; ATMOSPHERIC METHANE; MINNESOTA PEATLAND; GAS-EXCHANGE; CH4; FLUXES; CLIMATE; VEGETATION; PATTERNS; SOIL; N2O;
D O I
10.1029/2019JG005428
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Quantification of methane (CH4) emissions from wetlands and its sinks from uplands is still fraught with large uncertainties. Here, a methane biogeochemistry model was revised, parameterized, and verified for various wetland ecosystems across the globe. The model was then extrapolated to the global scale to quantify the uncertainty induced from four different types of uncertainty sources including parameterization, wetland type distribution, wetland area distribution, and meteorological input. We found that global wetland emissions are 212 +/- 62 and 212 +/- 32 Tg CH(4)year(-1)(1Tg = 10(12) g) due to uncertain parameters and wetland type distribution, respectively, during 2000-2012. Using two wetland distribution data sets and three sets of climate data, the model simulations indicated that the global wetland emissions range from 186 to 212 CH(4)year(-1)for the same period. The parameters were the most significant uncertainty source. After combining the global methane consumption in the range of -34 to -46 Tg CH(4)year(-1), we estimated that the global net land methane emissions are 149-176 Tg CH(4)year(-1)due to uncertain wetland distribution and meteorological input. Spatially, the northeast United States and Amazon were two hotspots of methane emission, while consumption hotspots were in the Eastern United States and eastern China. During 1950-2016, both wetland emissions and upland consumption increased during El Nino events and decreased during La Nina events. This study highlights the need for more in situ methane flux data, more accurate wetland type, and area distribution information to better constrain the model uncertainty.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Global carbon exchange and methane emissions from natural wetlands: Application of a process-based model
    Cao, MK
    Marshall, S
    Gregson, K
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 1996, 101 (D9) : 14399 - 14414
  • [22] Anthropogenic impacts on global storage and emissions of mercury from terrestrial soils: Insights from a new global model
    Smith-Downey, Nicole V.
    Sunderland, Elsie M.
    Jacob, Daniel J.
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-BIOGEOSCIENCES, 2010, 115
  • [23] Net primary productivity of China's terrestrial ecosystems from a process model driven by remote sensing
    Feng, X.
    Liu, G.
    Chen, J. M.
    Chen, M.
    Liu, J.
    Ju, W. M.
    Sun, R.
    Zhou, W.
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2007, 85 (03) : 563 - 573
  • [24] Quantification of methane emissions from cattle farms, using the tracer gas dispersion method
    Vechi, Nathalia T.
    Mellqvist, Johan
    Scheutz, Charlotte
    AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 330
  • [25] Global Tracking and Quantification of Oil and Gas Methane Emissions from Recurrent Sentinel-2 Imagery
    Ehret, Thibaud
    De Truchis, Aurelien
    Mazzolini, Matthieu
    Morel, Jean-Michel
    d'Aspremont, Alexandre
    Lauvaux, Thomas
    Duren, Riley
    Cusworth, Daniel
    Facciolo, Gabriele
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 56 (14) : 10517 - 10529
  • [26] Uncertainty in using dispersion models to estimate methane emissions from manure lagoons in dairies
    Thiruvenkatachari, Ranga Rajan
    Carranza, Valerie
    Ahangar, Faraz
    Marklein, Alison
    Hopkins, Francesca
    Venkatram, Akula
    AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 2020, 290
  • [27] Methane emissions from global wetlands: An assessment of the uncertainty associated with various wetland extent data sets
    Zhang, Bowen
    Tian, Hanqin
    Lu, Chaoqun
    Chen, Guangsheng
    Pan, Shufen
    Anderson, Christopher
    Poulter, Benjamin
    ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2017, 165 : 310 - 321
  • [29] Methane emissions from floodplains in the Amazon Basin: challenges in developing a process-based model for global applications
    Ringeval, B.
    Houweling, S.
    van Bodegom, P. M.
    Spahni, R.
    van Beek, R.
    Joos, F.
    Rockmann, T.
    BIOGEOSCIENCES, 2014, 11 (06) : 1519 - 1558
  • [30] Quantifying global terrestrial methanol emissions using observations from the TES satellite sensor
    Wells, K. C.
    Millet, D. B.
    Cady-Pereira, K. E.
    Shephard, M. W.
    Henze, D. K.
    Bousserez, N.
    Apel, E. C.
    de Gouw, J.
    Warneke, C.
    Singh, H. B.
    ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2014, 14 (05) : 2555 - 2570