Prediction of coal ash leaching behavior in acid mine water: Comparison of laboratory and field studies

被引:3
|
作者
Ziemkiewicz, PF [1 ]
Knox, AS
机构
[1] W Virginia Univ, W Virginia Water Res Inst, Morgantown, WV 26506 USA
[2] Westinghouse Savannah River Co, Savannah River Lab, Aiken, SC 29808 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1007/0-387-32177-2_6
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Strongly alkaline fluidized bed combustion (FBC) ash is commonly used to control acid mine drainage (AMD) in West Virginia coal mines. Objectives include acid neutralization and immobilization of the primary AMD pollutants: iron, aluminum and manganese. The process has been successful in controlling AMD though doubts remain regarding mobilization of other toxic elements present in the ash. In addition, AMD contains many toxic elements in low concentrations. And, each mine produces AMD of widely varying quality. So, predicting the effect of a particular ash on a given coal mine's drainage quality is of particular interest. In this chapter we compare the results of a site-specific ash leaching procedure with two large-scale field applications of FBC ash. The results suggested a high degree of predictability for roughly half of the 25 chemical parameters and poor predictability for the remainder. Of these, seven parameters were successfully predicted on both sites: acidity, Al, B, Ba, Fe, Ni and Zn while electrical conductivity, Ca, Cd, SO4, Pb and Sb were not successfully predicted on either site. Trends for the remaining elements: As, Ag, Be, Cu, Cr, Hg, Mg, Mn, pH, Se T1 and V were successfully predicted on one but not both mine sites.
引用
收藏
页码:50 / +
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Sodium fluoride assisted acid leaching of coal fly ash for the extraction of alumina
    Tripathy, A. K.
    Behera, B.
    Aishvarya, V.
    Sheik, A. R.
    Dash, B.
    Sarangi, C. K.
    Tripathy, B. C.
    Sanjay, K.
    Bhattacharya, I. N.
    MINERALS ENGINEERING, 2019, 131 : 140 - 145
  • [42] Laboratory investigation on behaviour of surface coal mine overburden stabilized with fly ash and lime
    Mishra, Manoj Kumar
    Behera, Banita
    Journal of Mines, Metals and Fuels, 2010, 58 (05): : 129 - 133
  • [43] Field studies of the leachability of aged brown coal ash
    Mudd, GM
    Kodikara, J
    JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, 2000, 76 (2-3) : 159 - 192
  • [44] Kinetics of Iron Extraction from Coal Fly Ash by Hydrochloric Acid Leaching
    Valeev, Dmitry
    Mikhailova, Alexandra
    Atmadzhidi, Alexandra
    METALS, 2018, 8 (07):
  • [45] Self inhibition of aluminum leaching from coal fly ash by sulfuric acid
    Seidel, A
    Sluszny, A
    Shelef, G
    Zimmels, Y
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 1999, 72 (03) : 195 - 207
  • [46] Self inhibition of aluminum leaching from coal fly ash by sulfuric acid
    Technion - Israel Inst of Technology, Haifa, Israel
    Chem Eng Sci, 8 (195-207):
  • [47] Comparison of gas and water pycnometry of coal mine wastes
    Univ of Queensland
    Geotech Test J, 1 (95-97):
  • [48] Extraction of Alumina from Coal Fly Ash with Sulfuric Acid Leaching Method
    李来时
    吴玉胜
    刘瑛瑛
    翟玉春
    过程工程学报, 2011, 11 (02) : 254 - 258
  • [49] Comparison of gas and water pycnometry of coal mine wastes
    Morris, PH
    Williams, DJ
    GEOTECHNICAL TESTING JOURNAL, 1996, 19 (01): : 95 - 97
  • [50] Water quality implications of the neutralization of acid mine drainage with coal fly ash from India and the United States
    Weinberg, Rachel
    Coyte, Rachel
    Wang, Zhen
    Das, Debabrata
    Vengosh, Avner
    FUEL, 2022, 330