Chemoprevention of breast cancer

被引:35
|
作者
Thomsen, Annelise [1 ]
Kolesar, Jill M. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Sch Pharm, Madison, WI 53705 USA
[2] Univ Wisconsin, Paul P Carbone Comprehens Canc Ctr, Madison, WI 53705 USA
关键词
Antineoplastic agents; Breast neoplasms; Diagnosis; Genetics; Raloxifene; Tamoxifen; Toxicity;
D O I
10.2146/ajhp070663
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Purpose. The risk factors for and risk assessment of breast cancer, recommendations for risk reduction, and roles of tamoxifen and raloxifene in the prevention of breast cancer are discussed. Summary. Breast cancer either may be a familial syndrome or develop sporadically. In familial syndromes, cancer occurs in multiple family members and the risk factors are primarily genetic. The majority of breast cancers are sporadic, and risk factors are primarily related to estrogen exposure. Recommendation strategies for reducing breast cancer risk include engaging in a healthy lifestyle by decreasing alcohol consumption, following a low-fat diet enriched with fruits and vegetables, exercising, and reducing weight if obese. Breast selfexaminations, clinical breast examinations, and screening mammographies are strategies for the early detection of breast cancer. Recommendations for the use of tamoxifen for risk reduction are intended only for women who are at an increased risk for the development of breast cancer as assessed by the Gail model. one study found a significantly increased risk of cardiovascular events and hypertriglyceridemia in the tamoxifen group compared to placebo. Raloxifene is also intended for women at high risk for breast cancer. During clinical trials, hot flashes, influenzalike syndromes, peripheral edema, and leg cramps were reported more frequently in patients receiving raloxifene when compared with patients receiving placebo, and the risk of thromboembolic disease was 3.1 times higher in the raloxifene group compared with the placebo. Conclusion. Tamoxifen and raloxifene are both indicated for and equally effective in the prevention of breast cancer in women at high risk for development of the disease. Raloxifene may have a more favorable adverse-effect profile, with fewer thromboembolic events and less uterine hyperplasia when compared with tamoxifen. Despite being at high risk, many women decide against breast cancer chemoprevention with either tamoxifen or raloxifene.
引用
收藏
页码:2221 / 2228
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Progress in chemoprevention of breast cancer
    Serrano, D
    Perego, E
    Costa, A
    Decensi, A
    [J]. CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ONCOLOGY HEMATOLOGY, 2004, 49 (02) : 109 - 117
  • [42] A review of breast cancer chemoprevention
    Chang, JCN
    [J]. BIOMEDICINE & PHARMACOTHERAPY, 1998, 52 (03) : 133 - 136
  • [43] SERMs in chemoprevention of breast cancer
    Gasco, M
    Argusti, A
    Bonanni, B
    Decensi, A
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2005, 41 (13) : 1980 - 1989
  • [44] Chemoprevention of breast cancer with fenretinide
    Torrisi, R
    Decensi, A
    Formelli, F
    Camerini, T
    De Palo, G
    [J]. DRUGS, 2001, 61 (07) : 909 - 918
  • [45] CHEMOPREVENTION OF BREAST-CANCER
    POWLES, TJ
    DAVEY, J
    MCKINNA, A
    [J]. ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 1989, 28 (06) : 865 - 867
  • [46] Chemoprevention of Breast Cancer with Fenretinide
    Rosalba Torrisi
    Andrea Decensi
    Franca Formelli
    Tiziana Camerini
    Giuseppe De Palo
    [J]. Drugs, 2001, 61 : 909 - 918
  • [47] Monoterpenes in breast cancer chemoprevention
    Pamela L. Crowell
    [J]. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 1997, 46 : 191 - 197
  • [48] Breast cancer chemoprevention - not yet there
    Gnant, Michael
    Blaha, Peter
    [J]. BREAST CARE, 2006, 1 (05) : 295 - 296
  • [49] CHEMOPREVENTION OF BREAST-CANCER
    POWLES, TJ
    HARDY, JR
    ASHLEY, SE
    COSGROVE, D
    DAVEY, JB
    DOWSETT, M
    MCKINNA, A
    NASH, AG
    RUNDLE, SK
    SINNETT, HD
    TILLYER, CR
    TRELEAVEN, JG
    [J]. BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 1989, 14 (01) : 23 - 31
  • [50] Breast cancer chemoprevention - Quo vadis?
    Powles, T
    [J]. BREAST, 2001, 10 : 58 - 61