A validation study of the 2003 American College of Cardiology/European Society of Cardiology and 2011 American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association risk stratification and treatment algorithms for sudden cardiac death in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

被引:113
|
作者
O'Mahony, Constantinos [1 ,2 ]
Tome-Esteban, Maite [1 ]
Lambiase, Pier D. [1 ]
Pantazis, Antonios [1 ]
Dickie, Shaughan [1 ]
McKenna, William J. [1 ]
Elliott, Perry M. [1 ]
机构
[1] UCL, Heart Hosp, Inherited Cardiac Dis Unit, London W1G 8PH, England
[2] London Chest Hosp, London E2 9JX, England
关键词
IMPLANTABLE CARDIOVERTER-DEFIBRILLATOR; LEFT-VENTRICULAR HYPERTROPHY; BLOOD-PRESSURE RESPONSE; PROGNOSTIC VALUE; EUROPEAN-SOCIETY; TASK-FORCE; SURVIVAL; EXERCISE; THERAPY; IDENTIFICATION;
D O I
10.1136/heartjnl-2012-303271
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aims Sudden cardiac death (SCD) is a common mode of death in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), but identification of patients who are at a high risk of SCD is challenging as current risk stratification guidelines have never been formally validated. The objective of this study was to assess the power of the 2003 American College of Cardiology (ACC)/European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and 2011 ACC Foundation (ACCF)/American Heart Association (AHA) SCD risk stratification algorithms to distinguish high risk patients who might be eligible for an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) from low risk individuals. Methods and results We studied 1606 consecutively evaluated HCM patients in an observational, retrospective cohort study. Five risk factors (RF) for SCD were assessed: non-sustained ventricular tachycardia, severe left ventricular hypertrophy, family history of SCD, unexplained syncope and abnormal blood pressure response to exercise. During a follow-up period of 11 712 patient years (median 6.6 years), SCD/appropriate ICD shock occurred in 20 (3%) of 660 patients without RF (annual rate 0.45%), 31 (4.8%) of 636 patients with 1 RF (annual rate 0.65%), 27 (10.8%) of 249 patients with 2 RF (annual rate 1.3%), 7 (13.7%) of 51 patients with 3 RF (annual rate 1.9%) and 4 (40%) of 10 patients with >= 4 RF (annual rate 5.0%). The risk of SCD increased with multiple RF (2 RF: HR 2.87, p <= 0.001; 3 RF: HR 4.32, p=0.001; >= 4 RF: HR 11.37, p<0.0001), but not with a single RF (HR 1.43 p=0.21). The area under time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curves (representing the probability of correctly identifying a patient at risk of SCD on the basis of RF profile) was 0.63 at 1 year and 0.64 at 5 years for the 2003 ACC/ESC algorithm and 0.61 at 1 year and 0.63 at 5 years for the 2011 ACCF/AHA algorithm. Conclusions The risk of SCD increases with the aggregation of RF. The 2003 ACC/ESC and 2011 ACCF/AHA guidelines distinguish high from low risk individuals with limited power.
引用
收藏
页码:534 / 541
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] American heart Association/American college of cardiology Foundation/Heart rhythm society scientific statement on noninvasive risk stratification techniques for identifying patients at risk for sudden cardiac death - A scientific statement from the American Heart Association council on clinical cardiology committee on electrocardiography and arrhythmias and council on epidemiology and prevention
    Goldberger, Jeffrey J.
    Cain, Michael E.
    Hohnloser, Stefan H.
    Kadish, Alan H.
    Knight, Bradley P.
    Lauer, Michael S.
    Maron, Barry J.
    Page, Richard L.
    Passman, Rod S.
    Siscovick, David
    Stevenson, William G.
    Zipes, Douglas P.
    CIRCULATION, 2008, 118 (14) : 1497 - 1518
  • [22] Combining European Society of Cardiology and American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association risk prediction model with polygenic risk scores to refine cardiovascular prevention
    De La Harpe, R.
    Thorball, C. W.
    Redin, C.
    Fournier, S.
    Muller, O.
    Strambo, D.
    Michel, P.
    Vollenweider, P.
    Marques-Vidal, P.
    Fellay, J.
    Vaucher, J.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2022, 43 : 2270 - 2270
  • [23] Performance of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology/Heart Rhythm Society versus European Society of Cardiology guideline criteria for hospital admission of patients with syncope
    de Lavallaz, Jeanne du Fay
    Zimmermann, Tobias
    Badertscher, Patrick
    Lopez-Ayala, Pedro
    Nestelberger, Thomas
    Miro, Oscar
    Salgado, Emilio
    Zaytseva, Xenia
    Gafner, Michele Sara
    Christ, Michael
    Cullen, Louise
    Than, Martin
    Martin-Sanchez, F. Javier
    Di Somma, Salvatore
    Peacock, W. Frank
    Keller, Dagmar, I
    Costabel, Juan Pablo
    Sigal, Alan
    Puelacher, Christian
    Wussler, Desiree
    Koechlin, Luca
    Strebel, Ivo
    Schuler, Sereina
    Manka, Robert
    Bilici, Murat
    Lohrmann, Jens
    Kuhne, Michael
    Breidthardt, Tobias
    Clark, Carol L.
    Probst, Marc
    Gibson, Thomas A.
    Weiss, Robert E.
    Sun, Benjamin C.
    Mueller, Christian
    HEART RHYTHM, 2022, 19 (10) : 1712 - 1722
  • [24] 2011 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines
    Gersh, Bernard J.
    Maron, Barry J.
    Bonow, Robert O.
    Dearani, Joseph A.
    Fifer, Michael A.
    Link, Mark S.
    Naidu, Srihari S.
    Nishimura, Rick A.
    Ommen, Steve R.
    Rakowski, Harry
    Seidman, Christine E.
    Towbin, Jeffrey A.
    Udelson, James E.
    Yancy, Clyde W.
    CIRCULATION, 2011, 124 (24) : E783 - U84
  • [25] American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Clinical Competence Statement on Echocardiography -: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association/American College of Physicians -: American Society of Internal Medicine Task Force on Clinical Competence
    Quiñones, MA
    Douglas, PS
    Foster, E
    Gorcsan, J
    Lewis, JF
    Pearlman, AS
    Rychik, J
    Salcedo, EE
    Seward, JB
    Stevenson, JG
    Thys, DM
    Weitz, HH
    Zoghbi, WA
    Creager, MA
    Winters, WL
    Elnicki, M
    Hirshfeld, JW
    Lorell, BH
    Rodgers, GP
    Tracy, CM
    Weitz, HH
    CIRCULATION, 2003, 107 (07) : 1068 - 1089
  • [26] Comparison of the 2016 and 2021 European Society of Cardiology and the 2019 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines for primary cardiovascular prevention
    Delabays, B.
    De La Harpe, R.
    Vollenweider, P.
    Fournier, S.
    Muller, O.
    Strombo, D.
    Michel, P.
    Nanchen, D.
    Marques-Vidal, P.
    Vaucher, J.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2022, 43 : 2248 - 2248
  • [27] REVIEW OF NEW AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION/AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY/HEART RHYTHM SOCIETY GUIDELINE FOR MANAGEMENT OF PATIENTS WITH VENTRICULAR ARRHYTHMIAS AND THE PREVENTION OF SUDDEN CARDIAC DEATH
    Mironov, N. Yu
    Golitsyn, S. P.
    KARDIOLOGIYA, 2018, 58 (11) : 94 - 100
  • [28] Perioperative Implications of the 2020 American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Patients with Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A Focused Review
    Addis, Dylan R.
    Townsley, Matthew M.
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR ANESTHESIA, 2022, 36 (07) : 2143 - 2153
  • [29] Underuse of American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Guidelines in hemodialysis patients
    Wolff Gowdak, Luis Henrique
    Arantes, Rodolfo Leite
    de Paula, Flavio Jota
    Krieger, Eduardo M.
    Galvao De Lima, Jose Jayme
    RENAL FAILURE, 2007, 29 (05) : 559 - 565
  • [30] American College of Cardiology American Heart Association Clinical Competence Statement on Stress Testing - A Report of the American College of Cardiology American Heart Association American College of Physicians American Society of Internal Medicine Task Force on Clinical Competence
    Rodgers, GP
    Ayanian, JZ
    Balady, G
    Beasley, JW
    Brown, KA
    Gervino, EV
    Paridon, S
    Quinones, M
    Schlant, RC
    Winters, WL
    Achord, JL
    Boone, AW
    Hirshfeld, JW
    Lorell, BH
    Rodgers, GP
    Tracy, CM
    Weitz, HH
    CIRCULATION, 2000, 102 (14) : 1726 - 1738