Withdrawal of Life-Sustaining Treatments in Perceived Devastating Brain Injury: The Key Role of Uncertainty

被引:44
|
作者
Lazaridis, Christos [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Chicago, Dept Neurol, Div Neurocrit Care, 5841 S Maryland Ave, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[2] Univ Chicago, Dept Neurosurg, Div Neurocrit Care, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[3] Univ Chicago Med, 5841 S Maryland Ave, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
关键词
Brain injury; Decision-making; Disability; Chronic conditions and rehabilitation; End-of-life issues; TRAUMATIC BRAIN; DECISION-MAKING; HEALTH-CARE; DISABILITY PARADOX; NEUROCRITICAL CARE; DISORDERS; CONSCIOUSNESS; COMMUNICATION; SUPPORT; HEURISTICS;
D O I
10.1007/s12028-018-0595-8
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
BackgroundWithdrawal of life-sustaining treatment (WOLST) is the leading proximate cause of death in patients with perceived devastating brain injury (PDBI). There are reasons to believe that a potentially significant proportion of WOLST decisions, in this setting, are premature and guided by a number of assumptions that falsely confer a sense of certainty.MethodThis manuscript proposes that these assumptions face serious challenges, and that we should replace unwarranted certainty with an appreciation for the great degree of multi-dimensional uncertainty involved. The article proceeds by offering a taxonomy of uncertainty in PDBI and explores the key role that uncertainty as a cognitive state, may play into how WOLST decisions are reached.ConclusionIn order to properly share decision-making with families and surrogates of patients with PDBI, we will have to acknowledge, understand, and be able to communicate the great degree of uncertainty involved.
引用
收藏
页码:33 / 41
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Withholding and withdrawal of life-sustaining treatments for neonate in Japan: Are hospital practices associated with physicians' beliefs, practices, or perceived barriers?
    Yotani, Nobuyuki
    Nabetani, Makoto
    Feudtner, Chris
    Honda, Junko
    Kizawa, Yoshiyuki
    Iijima, Kazumoto
    EARLY HUMAN DEVELOPMENT, 2020, 141
  • [32] Withdrawal of Life-Sustaining Therapies and Brain Death in the Intensive Care Unit
    Varelas, Panayiotis N.
    Abdelhak, Tamer
    Hacein-Bey, Lotfi
    SEMINARS IN NEUROLOGY, 2008, 28 (05) : 726 - 735
  • [33] Forgoing life-sustaining treatments - Response
    Sprung, CL
    Eidelman, LA
    Pizov, R
    MAYO CLINIC PROCEEDINGS, 1996, 71 (12) : 1212 - 1213
  • [34] Admitting Hospital Influences on Withdrawal of Life-Sustaining Treatment Decision for Patients With Severe Traumatic Brain Injury
    Malhotra, Armaan K.
    Shakil, Husain
    Smith, Christopher W.
    Mathieu, Francois
    Merali, Zamir
    Jaffe, Rachael H.
    Harrington, Erin M.
    He, Yingshi
    Wijeysundera, Duminda N.
    Kulkarni, Abhaya V.
    Ladha, Karim
    Wilson, Jefferson R.
    Nathens, Avery B.
    Witiw, Christopher D.
    NEUROSURGERY, 2024, 94 (06) : 1262 - 1272
  • [35] Withdrawal of life-sustaining medical devices at the end of life
    Beattie, James M.
    BMJ SUPPORTIVE & PALLIATIVE CARE, 2013, 3 (01) : 9 - +
  • [36] Withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy: the case for delay
    Foex, Bernard A.
    EMERGENCY MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2017, 34 (04) : 203 - 204
  • [37] Terminal withdrawal of life-sustaining supplemental oxygen
    Halpern, Scott D.
    Hansen-Flaschen, John
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2006, 296 (11): : 1397 - 1400
  • [38] The Impact of Socioeconomic Status on Decision on Withdrawal of Life-sustaining Treatments in Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
    Haripottawekul, Ariyaporn
    Stipanovich, Ava
    Uriarte, Sarah A.
    Persad-Paisley, Elijah M.
    Furie, Karen L.
    Reznik, Michael E.
    Mahta, Ali
    NEUROCRITICAL CARE, 2025,
  • [39] Logistics of Withdrawal of Life-Sustaining Therapies in PICU
    Dryden-Palmer, Karen
    Haut, Cathy
    Murphy, Samantha
    Moloney-Harmon, Patricia
    PEDIATRIC CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2018, 19 : S19 - S25
  • [40] Death with dignity - On the withdrawal of life-sustaining measures
    Backlund, EO
    NEUROSURGERY AND MEDICAL ETHICS, 1999, 74 : 71 - 74