Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Oral Phosphodiesterase Type 5 Inhibitors for Erectile Dysfunction: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis

被引:176
|
作者
Yuan, JinQiu [1 ]
Zhang, RenJie [1 ]
Yang, ZuYao [1 ,2 ]
Lee, Jack [3 ]
Liu, YaLi [4 ]
Tian, JinHui [4 ]
Qin, XiWen [1 ]
Ren, ZhengJia [1 ]
Ding, Hong [5 ]
Chen, Qing [5 ]
Mao, Chen [1 ,2 ]
Tang, JinLing [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Div Epidemiol, Sch Publ Hlth & Primary Care, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Shenzhen Municipal Key Lab Hlth Risk Anal, Shenzhen Res Inst, Shenzhen, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[3] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Div Biostat, Sch Publ Hlth & Primary Care, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[4] Lanzhou Univ, Evidence Based Med Ctr, Sch Basic Med Sci, Lanzhou 730000, Peoples R China
[5] Southern Med Univ, Dept Epidemiol, Sch Publ Hlth & Trop Med, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
关键词
Phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors; Erectile dysfunction; Systematic review; Network meta-analysis; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; PLACEBO-CONTROLLED TRIAL; DOUBLE-BLIND; SILDENAFIL CITRATE; CLINICAL-TRIAL; OPEN-LABEL; LODENAFIL CARBONATE; MULTIPLE-SCLEROSIS; ON-DEMAND; MEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.eururo.2013.01.012
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Context: Phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE5-Is) are currently the first-line therapy for erectile dysfunction (ED), but available studies investigating the comparative effects of different PDE5-Is are limited. Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of different classes of oral PDE5-Is for ED. Evidence acquisition: A systematic search was performed in PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase to identify randomized controlled trials that compared different PDE5-Is or PDE5-Is with a placebo for ED. The methodological quality of included studies was appraised with the Cochrane Collaboration bias appraisal tool, and the quality of evidence was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system. Evidence synthesis: A total of 118 trials (31 195 individuals) were included. There was no major difference in the results between the traditional meta-analysis and the network meta-analysis. Network meta-analysis demonstrated that PDE5-Is were superior to placebo to improve erectile function. Compared with tadalafil (relative risk [RR]: 0.61; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.33-0.90) and vardenafil (RR: 0.63; 95% CI, 0.35-0.92), avanafil was less effective on Global Assessment Questionnaire question 1. Tadalafil was more effective than vardenafil (mean difference [MD]: 1.49; 95% CI, 0.50-2.50) and udenafil (MD: -1.84; 95% CI, -3.31 to -0.33) as measured by the erectile function domain of the International Index of Erectile Function. For all efficacy outcomes, the absolute effects and the rank tests indicated that tadalafil and vardenafil were the most effective agents. After adjusting for dosage, the conclusion remained the same. Safety analysis showed there was no major difference among different agents. Conclusions: In recommended doses, oral PDE5-Is are more effective than placebo for ED, and tadalafil seems to be the most effective agent, followed by vardenafil. PDE5-Is are generally safe and well tolerated, and there is no major difference on the safety profile. (C) 2013 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:902 / 912
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [42] Comparative safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors in cancer: systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Xu, Cheng
    Chen, Yu-Pei
    Du, Xiao-Jing
    Liu, Jin-Qi
    Huang, Cheng-Long
    Chen, Lei
    Zhou, Guan-Qun
    Li, Wen-Fei
    Mao, Yan-Ping
    Hsu, Chiun
    Liu, Qing
    Lin, Ai-Hua
    Tang, Ling-Long
    Sun, Ying
    Ma, Jun
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2018, 363
  • [43] Phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors use and risk of colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Bhagavathula, Akshaya Srikanth
    Tesfaye, Wubshet
    Vidyasagar, Kota
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2021, 36 (12) : 2577 - 2584
  • [44] Are phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors associated with increased risk of melanoma? A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Feng, Shijian
    Zhou, Liang
    Liu, Qinyu
    He, Qing
    Liao, Banghua
    Wei, Xin
    Li, Hong
    Wang, Kunjie
    Zhu, Yuchun
    [J]. MEDICINE, 2018, 97 (03)
  • [45] Phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors use and risk of colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Akshaya Srikanth Bhagavathula
    Wubshet Tesfaye
    Kota Vidyasagar
    [J]. International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 2021, 36 : 2577 - 2584
  • [46] Effect of different physical activities on erectile dysfunction in adult men not receiving phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Chen, Zihao
    Wang, Jiaxin
    Jia, Junqiang
    Wu, Chunhui
    Song, Jiulong
    Tu, Jiayuan
    [J]. ANDROLOGY, 2024,
  • [47] Type 5 phosphodiesterase inhibitors: Curing erectile dysfunction
    Hellstrom, Wayne J. G.
    Kendirci, Muammer
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2006, 49 (06) : 942 - 945
  • [48] The effectiveness of psychological interventions alone, or in combination with phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors, for the treatment of erectile dysfunction:A systematic review
    Atallah, Sandrine
    Haydar, Asad
    Jabbour, Teddy
    Kfoury, Peter
    Sader, Georgio
    [J]. ARAB JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 19 (03) : 310 - 322
  • [49] Erectile Dysfunction and Depression: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Liu, Qian
    Zhang, Youpeng
    Wang, Jin
    Li, Sen
    Cheng, Yongbiao
    Guo, Jialun
    Tang, Yong
    Zeng, Hanqing
    Zhu, Zhaohui
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SEXUAL MEDICINE, 2018, 15 (08): : 1073 - 1082
  • [50] Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cycling and Erectile Dysfunction
    Gan, Zoe S.
    Ehlers, Mark E.
    Lin, Feng-Chang
    Wright, Sarah T.
    Figler, Bradley D.
    Coward, R. Matthew
    [J]. SEXUAL MEDICINE REVIEWS, 2021, 9 (02) : 304 - 311