机构:
Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Philosophy, 9500 Gilman Dr, La Jolla, CA 92093 USAUniv Calif San Diego, Dept Philosophy, 9500 Gilman Dr, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
Brink, David O.
[1
]
机构:
[1] Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Philosophy, 9500 Gilman Dr, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
Culpability is not a unitary concept within the criminal law, and it is important to distinguish different culpability concepts and the work they do. Narrow culpability is an ingredient in wrongdoing itself, describing the agent's elemental mens rea (purpose, knowledge, recklessness, and negligence). Broad culpability is the responsibility condition that makes wrongdoing blameworthy and without which wrongdoing is excused. Inclusive culpability is the combination of wrongdoing and responsibility or broad culpability that functions as the retributivist desert basis for punishment. Each of these kinds of culpability plays an important role in a unified retributive framework for the criminal law. Moreover, the distinction between narrow and broad culpability has significance for understanding and assessing the distinction between attributability and accountability and the nature and permissibility of strict liability crimes.