A comparative techno-economic assessment of fast pyrolysis, hydrothermal liquefaction, and intermediate pyrolysis of municipal solid waste for liquid transportation fuels production

被引:17
|
作者
Rahman, Wasel-Ur [1 ]
Patel, Madhumita [1 ,2 ]
Kurian, Vinoj [1 ]
Kumar, Amit [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alberta, Dept Mech Engn, 10-263 Donadeo Innovat Ctr Engn, Edmonton, AB T6G 1H9, Canada
[2] Indian Sch Mines, Indian Inst Technol, Dept Environm Sci & Engn, Dhanbad, Bihar, India
关键词
Intermediate pyrolysis; Transportation fuels; Comparative techno-economic model; Hydrothermal liquefaction; Fast pyrolysis; Decentralized; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; BIOMASS FAST PYROLYSIS; BIO-OIL PRODUCTION; COMBINED HEAT; JET FUEL; THERMOCHEMICAL CONVERSION; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS; SUSTAINABLE LIQUID; MANAGEMENT-SYSTEMS; ENERGY RECOVERY;
D O I
10.1016/j.enconman.2022.115877
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
The conversion of municipal solid waste (MSW) to transportation fuels can be an attractive route to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from the transportation and municipal sectors. Thermochemical conversion routes like hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL), fast pyrolysis (FP), and intermediate pyrolysis (IP) have been shown to be adept at converting organic dominant MSW into bio-crude or bio-oil. However, to produce compatible transportation grade fuels, it is necessary to upgrade the intermediate product (bio-crude or bio-oil) from all the processes, the extent of which differs depending on the process. Moreover, depending on the conversion technique, the production configuration can be either centralized or decentralized. In a centralized system, feed is transported to a facility to produce the intermediate and upgrade it (on-site upgrading), while in a decentralized system, the intermediate is produced elsewhere and transported to an upgrading facility (off-site upgrading).. Four scenarios were developed and modeled to compare the cost of production of gasoline, diesel and jet fuel from bio-crudes produced from HTL, FP, and IP.. The scenarios are: 1) a centralized HTL plant (C-HTL); 2000 dry t per day; on-site upgrading, 2) a centralized FP plant (C-FP); 2000 dry t per day; on-site upgrading, 3) a decentralized FP plant (D-FP); 50 dry t per day; off-site upgrading, and 4) a decentralized IP plant; 12 dry t per day; off-site upgrading.. Jet fuel was the primary fuel for comparison and the production costs were calculated to be $ 0.72, $ 0.85, $ 1.04, and $ 0.81 per liter for the C-HTL, the C-FP, the D-FP, and the D-IP plants, respectively. Secondary products (gasoline and diesel) can be produced alongside in cost ranges of $ 0.97 - $ 1.40 per liter and $ 1.02 - $ 1.47 per liter, respectively. The information conveyed in this study helps to identify the potential of thermochemical conversion processes to produce transportation fuels at competitive prices. The critical barriers to adopt such large-scale production processes and the opportunities of small-scale decentralized production are also mentioned. The outcomes of this study can be used to direct research and investment to address the major roadblocks that are slowing the extensive development of these technologies.
引用
下载
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Techno-Economic and Environmental Assessment of Municipal Solid Waste Energetic Valorization
    Machin, Einara Blanco
    Pedroso, Daniel Travieso
    Acosta, Daviel Gomez
    Silva dos Santos, Maria Isabel
    de Carvalho, Felipe Solferini
    Machin, Adrian Blanco
    Neira Ortiz, Matias Abner
    Sanchez Arriagada, Reinaldo
    Travieso Fernandez, Daniel Ignacio
    Braga Maciel, Lucia Bollini
    Cuevas Arcos, Daniel
    Guerra Reyes, Yanet
    de Carvalho Junior, Joao Andrade
    ENERGIES, 2022, 15 (23)
  • [22] Techno-Economic Assessment of Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) Incineration in Ghana
    Yakah, Noah
    Kwarteng, Augustine Akuoko
    Addy, Cyrus
    Yirenkyi, Michael
    Martin, Andrew
    Simons, Anthony
    PROCESSES, 2024, 12 (07)
  • [23] Techno-economic assessment of upgraded pyrolysis bio-oils for future marine fuels
    Letoffet, Antoine
    Campion, Nicolas
    Bohme, Moritz
    Jensen, Claus Dalsgaard
    Ahrenfeldt, Jesper
    Clausen, Lasse Rongaard
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2024, 306
  • [24] A techno-economic comparison of power production by biomass fast pyrolysis with gasification and combustion
    Bridgwater, AV
    Toft, AJ
    Brammer, JG
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2002, 6 (03): : 181 - 248
  • [25] Techno-economic feasibility assessment of sorption enhanced gasification of municipal solid waste for hydrogen production
    Santos, Monica P. S.
    Hanak, Dawid P.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2022, 47 (10) : 6586 - 6604
  • [26] Techno-economic feasibility assessment of sorption enhanced gasification of municipal solid waste for hydrogen production
    Santos, Mónica P.S.
    Hanak, Dawid P.
    International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2022, 47 (10): : 6586 - 6604
  • [27] Techno-economic assessment of green urea production utilizing municipal solid waste and hydropower in Nepal
    Gyanwali, Khem
    Karki, Saroj
    Adhikari, Padam
    Devkota, Sijan
    Aryal, Prakash
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2023, 419
  • [28] Techno-Economic Analysis of Fast Pyrolysis as a Process Step Within Biomass-to-Liquid Fuel Production
    Frederik Trippe
    Magnus Fröhling
    Frank Schultmann
    Ralph Stahl
    Edmund Henrich
    Waste and Biomass Valorization, 2010, 1 : 415 - 430
  • [29] Techno-Economic Analysis of Fast Pyrolysis as a Process Step Within Biomass-to-Liquid Fuel Production
    Trippe, Frederik
    Froehling, Magnus
    Schultmann, Frank
    Stahl, Ralph
    Henrich, Edmund
    WASTE AND BIOMASS VALORIZATION, 2010, 1 (04) : 415 - 430
  • [30] Techno-economic analysis of renewable fuels production from sewage sludge through hydrothermal liquefaction
    Ranganathan, Panneerselvam
    SUSTAINABLE ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES AND ASSESSMENTS, 2023, 57