Socio-economic differentials in cannabis use trends in Australia

被引:13
|
作者
Chan, Gary C. K. [1 ]
Leung, Janni [2 ]
Quinn, Catherine [1 ]
Weier, Megan [1 ]
Hall, Wayne [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Ctr Youth Subst Abuse Res, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[2] Univ Queensland, Sch Publ Hlth, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
关键词
Cannabis; disadvantage; education; marijuana; socio-economic status; trends; ALCOHOL-CONSUMPTION; EDUCATIONAL INEQUALITIES; CIGARETTE-SMOKING; TIME PERSPECTIVE; DISPARITIES; HEALTH; QUIT; ASSOCIATIONS; PREVALENCE; INDICATORS;
D O I
10.1111/add.14010
中图分类号
R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];
学科分类号
摘要
Aim To test if the degree of change in cannabis use between 2001 and 2013 differed according to socio-economic status. Design Repeated cross-sectional household surveys that were nationally representative. Setting Australia. Participants Adult samples from the 2001 and 2013 National Drug Strategy Household Surveys (n = 23642 in 2001 and n = 21353 in 2013), the largest nationally representative survey on drug use in Australia. Measurements Frequency of cannabis use coded as daily use, weekly use, less than weekly use and non-current use; socio-economic status (SES) as measured by personal income and educational level. Finding There were significant differences in changes to levels of cannabis use between SES groups. Among participants who completed high school, the probability of daily use decreased from 0.014 to 0.009 (P < 0.001), and the probability of weekly use decreased from 0.025 to 0.017 (P < 0.001). These probabilities remained stable for participants who did not complete high school. The probability of weekly cannabis use decreased from 0.032 to 0.023 among participants with middle level income (P = 0.004), and from 0.021 to 0.013 among those with high income (P = 0.005). There were no significant changes in these probabilities among those with low income (0.026 in 2001 and 0.032 in 2013; P = 0.203). Conclusion The decline in cannabis use in Australia from 2001 to 2013 occurred largely among higher socio-economic status groups. For people with lower income and/or lower education, rates of frequent cannabis use remained unchanged.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:454 / 461
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Demographic, socio-economic, and cultural factors affecting fertility differentials in Nepal
    Adhikari, Ramesh
    BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2010, 10
  • [32] Socio-economic differentials in childhood immunization in India, 1992-2006
    Kumar A.
    Mohanty S.K.
    Journal of Population Research, 2011, 28 (4) : 301 - 324
  • [33] Socio-economic differentials in acute hospitalisation in Rome, 1996-2000
    Cesaroni, G
    Davoli, M
    Schifano, P
    Perucci, CA
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2002, 12 (04): : 46 - 46
  • [34] On measuring group-differentials displayed by socio-economic indicators: an extension
    Mishra, Srijit
    APPLIED ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2008, 15 (12) : 935 - 938
  • [35] SOCIAL-CLASS AND SOCIO-ECONOMIC DIFFERENTIALS IN DIVORCE IN ENGLAND AND WALES
    HASKEY, J
    POPULATION STUDIES-A JOURNAL OF DEMOGRAPHY, 1984, 38 (03): : 419 - 438
  • [36] Demographic, socio-economic, and cultural factors affecting fertility differentials in Nepal
    Ramesh Adhikari
    BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 10
  • [37] Education and socio-economic differentials: A study of school performance in the Western Cape
    Van der Berg, S
    Burger, R
    SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2003, 71 (03) : 496 - 522
  • [38] Socio-economic Differentials in Male Mortality in Ireland 1984-2008
    Layte, Richard
    Nolan, Anne
    ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL REVIEW, 2016, 47 (03) : 361 - 390
  • [39] Inequalities in child mortality in Mozambique:: differentials by parental socio-economic position
    Macassa, G
    Ghilagaber, G
    Bernhardt, E
    Diderichsen, F
    Burström, B
    SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2003, 57 (12) : 2255 - 2264
  • [40] Socio-economic analysis of AED use
    Robakowska, Marlena
    Pogorzelczyk, K.
    Basinski, A.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 31