National survey on caffeine use in neonatal units across the United Kingdom

被引:4
|
作者
Grainge, Stephanie [1 ]
Nair, Vrinda [1 ,2 ]
Loganathan, Prakash Kannan [1 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] James Cook Univ Hosp, Neonatal Unit, Middlesbrough, England
[2] Newcastle Univ, Translat & Clin Res Inst, Newcastle Upon Tyne, England
[3] Newcastle Univ, Fac Med Sci, Clin Acad Off, Newcastle Upon Tyne, England
[4] James Cook Univ Hosp, Marton Rd, Middlesbrough TS4 3BW, England
关键词
apnoea of prematurity; caffeine; CLINICAL-OUTCOMES; THERAPY; APNEA; ASSOCIATION; CITRATE;
D O I
10.1111/apa.16635
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
Aim: To understand the variations in practice for caffeine use among neonatal units in the United Kingdom. Methods: An online survey was sent to every neonatal unit in the United Kingdom. Results: We received a response from 92 neonatal units (47%) with the proportion of response from special care, Local neonatal units, neonatal intensive care units and neonatal surgical units were 23%, 34%, 23% and 21% respectively. All the units reported the use of caffeine, and 40 units (46%) initiated caffeine within 24 h of birth. Fifty-nine units (64%) reported routine use of caffeine for pre-term infants < 32 weeks. Seventy-one units (77%) reported that they continue caffeine for infants needing mechanical ventilation. Thirty-one units (34%) discontinued caffeine at 34 weeks post-menstrual age, irrespective of the respiratory support. Ten units (11%) reported discontinuation of caffeine only after weaning off all respiratory support, and 40% of units had a variable practice of discontinuing caffeine depending on the individual baby. Seventy-nine units (86%) reported they would regularly optimise caffeine dose based on weight checks. Conclusion: Our survey showed some variation in practice with regards to the timing of caffeine initiation, gestational age cut-off for routine caffeine prescription and discontinuation.
引用
收藏
页码:1865 / 1869
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Nonresponders in a prospective national survey in the United Kingdom
    Price, GM
    Paul, AA
    Cole, TJ
    Wadsworth, MEJ
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, 1997, 65 (04): : 1341 - 1342
  • [32] National survey of the use and application of leeches in oral and maxillofacial surgery in the United Kingdom
    Taneja, Pankaj
    Rowson, John
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2011, 49 (06): : 438 - 441
  • [33] Characteristics of Invasive Staphylococcus aureus in United Kingdom Neonatal Units
    Vergnano, Stefania
    Menson, Esse
    Smith, Zoe
    Kennea, Nigel
    Embleton, Nick
    Clarke, Paul
    Watts, Timothy
    Health, Paul T.
    PEDIATRIC INFECTIOUS DISEASE JOURNAL, 2011, 30 (10) : 850 - 854
  • [34] A national survey on current practice of use of selective digestive decontamination in the United Kingdom
    R Shah
    J Louw
    T Veenith
    Critical Care, 12 (Suppl 2):
  • [35] Postnatal corticosteroid usage in United Kingdom and Ireland neonatal units
    Jenkinson, Allan C.
    Kaltsogianni, Ourania
    Dassios, Theodore
    Greenough, Anne
    ACTA PAEDIATRICA, 2023, 112 (12) : 2503 - 2506
  • [36] Antimicrobial policies in the neonatal units of the United Kingdom and Republic of Ireland
    Fernando, Andrew Michael Russell
    Heath, Paul Trafford
    Menson, Esse Natasha
    JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 2008, 61 (03) : 743 - 745
  • [37] OMALIZUMAB: A NATIONAL REVIEW OF PRACTISE ACROSS THE UNITED KINGDOM
    Holmes, L. J.
    THORAX, 2012, 67 : A65 - A65
  • [38] A national survey of observation units in the United States
    Mace, SE
    Graff, L
    Mikhail, M
    Ross, M
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2003, 21 (07): : 529 - 533
  • [39] Constipation and its implications in the critically ill patient: a national survey of United Kingdom intensive care units
    Mostafa, SM
    Bhandari, S
    Ritchie, G
    Arthan, E
    Grattan, N
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2001, 87 (02) : 343P - 343P
  • [40] The use of lofexidine by drug dependency units in the United Kingdom
    Akhurst, JS
    EUROPEAN ADDICTION RESEARCH, 1999, 5 (01) : 43 - 49