Detecting Left Heart Failure in Echocardiography through Machine Learning: A Systematic Review

被引:0
|
作者
Liastuti, Lies Dina [1 ,2 ]
Siswanto, Bambang Budi [1 ]
Sukmawan, Renan [1 ]
Jatmiko, Wisnu [3 ]
Nursakina, Yosilia [2 ,4 ]
Putri, Rindayu Yusticia Indira [1 ]
Jati, Grafika [3 ]
Nur, Aqsha Azhary [2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Indonesia, Fac Med, Natl Cardiovasc Ctr, Dept Cardiol & Vasc Med,Harapan Kita Hosp, Jakarta 15810, Indonesia
[2] Univ Indonesia, Dr Cipto Mangunkusumo Hosp, Dept Cardiol & Vasc Med, Fac Med, Jakarta 10430, Indonesia
[3] Univ Indonesia, Dept Comp Sci, Fac Comp Sci, Depok 16424, Indonesia
[4] Imperial Coll London, Sch Publ Hlth, London SW7 2BX, England
[5] Johns Hopkins Bloomberg Sch Publ Hlth, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
关键词
heart failure; echocardiography; machine learning; ARTIFICIAL-INTELLIGENCE; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.31083/j.rcm2312402
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Heart failure remains a considerable burden to healthcare in Asia. Early intervention, mainly using echocardiography, to assess cardiac function is crucial. However, due to limited resources and time, the procedure has become more challenging during the COVID-19 pandemic. On the other hand, studies have shown that artificial intelligence (AI) is highly potential in complementing the work of clinicians to diagnose heart failure accurately and rapidly. Methods: We systematically searched Europe PMC, ProQuest, Science Direct, PubMed, and IEEE following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and our inclusion and exclusion criteria. The 14 selected works of literature were then assessed for their quality and risk of bias using the QUADAS-2 (Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies). Results: A total of 2105 studies were retrieved, and 14 were included in the analysis. Five studies posed risks of bias. Nearly all studies included datasets in the form of 3D (three dimensional) or 2D (two dimensional) images, along with apical four-chamber (A4C) and apical two-chamber (A2C) being the most common echocardiography views used. The machine learning algorithm for each study differs, with the convolutional neural network as the most common method used. The accuracy varies from 57% to 99.3%. Conclusions: To conclude, current evidence suggests that the application of AI leads to a better and faster diagnosis of left heart failure through echocardiography. However, the presence of clinicians is still irreplaceable during diagnostic processes and overall clinical care; thus, AI only serves as complementary assistance for clinicians.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Value of Thoracic Echocardiography in the Diagnosis of Acute Heart Failure: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Xie, Cuihuan
    Qi, Yingying
    Li, Di
    ALTERNATIVE THERAPIES IN HEALTH AND MEDICINE, 2023, 29 (06) : 322 - 327
  • [22] Machine learning-based 30-day readmission prediction models for patients with heart failure: a systematic review
    Yu, Min-Young
    Son, Youn-Jung
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR NURSING, 2024,
  • [23] Comparing Machine Learning Models and Statistical Models for Predicting Heart Failure Events: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Sun, Zhoujian
    Dong, Wei
    Shi, Hanrui
    Ma, Hong
    Cheng, Lechao
    Huang, Zhengxing
    FRONTIERS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2022, 9
  • [24] Left ventricular contractile reserve by stress echocardiography as a predictor of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ciampi, Quirino
    Carpeggiani, Clara
    Michelassi, Claudio
    Villari, Bruno
    Picano, Eugenio
    BMC CARDIOVASCULAR DISORDERS, 2017, 17
  • [25] Left ventricular contractile reserve by stress echocardiography as a predictor of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Quirino Ciampi
    Clara Carpeggiani
    Claudio Michelassi
    Bruno Villari
    Eugenio Picano
    BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, 17
  • [26] Machine Learning for Detecting Data Exfiltration: A Review
    Sabir, Bushra
    Ullah, Faheem
    Babar, M. Ali
    Gaire, Raj
    ACM COMPUTING SURVEYS, 2022, 54 (03)
  • [27] Adoption of machine learning technology for failure prediction in industrial maintenance: A systematic review
    Leukel, Joerg
    Gonzalez, Julian
    Riekert, Martin
    JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS, 2021, 61 : 87 - 96
  • [28] Systematic literature review: Machine learning techniques (machine learning)
    Alfaro, Anderson Damian Jimenez
    Ospina, Jose Vicente Diaz
    CUADERNO ACTIVA, 2021, (13): : 113 - 121
  • [29] Machine-learning Algorithms for Ischemic Heart Disease Prediction: A Systematic Review
    Hani, Salam H. Bani
    Ahmad, Muayyad M.
    CURRENT CARDIOLOGY REVIEWS, 2023, 19 (01) : 87 - 99
  • [30] Machine learning-based heart disease diagnosis: A systematic literature review
    Ahsan, Md Manjurul
    Siddique, Zahed
    ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN MEDICINE, 2022, 128