Storing OWL Ontologies in SQL Relational Databases

被引:0
|
作者
Astrova, Irina [1 ]
Korda, Nahum [2 ]
Kalja, Ahto [1 ]
机构
[1] Tallinn Univ Technol, Inst Cybernet, Tallinn, Estonia
[2] Technion Israel Inst Technol, IL-32000 Haifa, Israel
关键词
Ontologies; relational databases; SQL; OWL;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Relational databases are often used as a basis for persistent storage of ontologies to facilitate rapid operations such as search and retrieval, and to utilize the benefits of relational databases management systems such as transaction management, security and integrity control. On the other hand, there appear more and more OWL files that contain ontologics. Therefore, this paper proposes to extract ontologies from OWL files and then store them in relational databases. A prerequisite for this storing is transformation of ontologies to relational databases, which is the purpose of this paper.
引用
收藏
页码:167 / +
页数:2
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Fuzzy Query over Ontologies based on Relational Databases
    Tong, Qiang
    Zhang, Fu
    Cheng, Jingwei
    2017 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTATIONAL SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING (CSE) AND IEEE/IFIP INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EMBEDDED AND UBIQUITOUS COMPUTING (EUC), VOL 1, 2017, : 282 - 290
  • [32] OWLRel: Learning Rich Ontologies from Relational Databases
    Al Khuzayem, Lama
    McBrien, Peter
    BALTIC JOURNAL OF MODERN COMPUTING, 2016, 4 (03): : 466 - 482
  • [33] Ontologies versus relational databases: are they so different? A comparison
    Carmen Martinez-Cruz
    Ignacio J. Blanco
    M. Amparo Vila
    Artificial Intelligence Review, 2012, 38 : 271 - 290
  • [34] Tools for Mapping Ontologies to Relational Databases: A Comparative Evaluation
    Moldovan, Dorin
    Antal, Marcel
    Valea, Dan
    Pop, Claudia
    Cioara, Tudor
    Anghel, Ionut
    Salomie, Ioan
    2015 IEEE 11TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT COMPUTER COMMUNICATION AND PROCESSING (ICCP), 2015, : 77 - 83
  • [35] Ontologies versus relational databases: are they so different? A comparison
    Martinez-Cruz, Carmen
    Blanco, Ignacio J.
    Amparo Vila, M.
    ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE REVIEW, 2012, 38 (04) : 271 - 290
  • [36] Efficient processing of huge ontologies in logic and relational databases
    Weithöner, T
    Liebig, T
    Specht, G
    ON THE MOVE TO MEANINGFUL INTERNET SYSTEMS 2004: OTM 2004 WORKSHOPS, PROCEEDINGS, 2004, 3292 : 28 - 29
  • [37] Linkage scenarios of relational databases and ontologies: a systematic mapping
    Lopez Rodriguez, Yoan Antonio
    Hidalgo Delgado, Yusniel
    Silega Martinez, Nemury
    ENFOQUE UTE, 2021, 12 (04): : 58 - 75
  • [38] Efficiently querying relational databases using OWL and SWRL
    O'Connor, Martin
    Shankar, Ravi
    Tu, Samson
    Nyulas, Csongor
    Das, Amar
    Musen, Mark
    WEB REASONING AND RULE SYSTEMS, PROCEEDINGS, 2007, 4524 : 361 - +
  • [39] An extension of SQL to support ordered domains in relational databases
    Ng, W
    Levene, M
    IDEAS '97 - INTERNATIONAL DATABASE ENGINEERING AND APPLICATIONS SYMPOSIUM, PROCEEDINGS, 1997, : 358 - 367
  • [40] Storing XML (with XSD) in SQL databases: Interplay of logical and physical designs
    Chaudhuri, S
    Chen, ZY
    Shim, K
    Wu, YQ
    20TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DATA ENGINEERING, PROCEEDINGS, 2004, : 842 - 842