The 26 November 2019 Mw 6.4 Albania Destructive Earthquake

被引:20
|
作者
Papadopoulos, Gerassimos A. [1 ]
Agalos, Apostolos [1 ]
Carydis, Panayotis [2 ]
Lekkas, Efthimios [3 ]
Mavroulis, Spyridon [3 ]
Triantafyllou, Ioanna [3 ]
机构
[1] Int Soc Prevent & Mitigat Nat Hazards, Athens, Greece
[2] Natl Tech Univ Athens, Lab Earthquake Engn, Athens, Greece
[3] Natl & Kapodistrian Univ Athens, Fac Geol & Geoenvironm, Dept Dynam Tecton & Appl Geol, Athens, Greece
关键词
RUPTURE HISTORY; INVERSION; CALIFORNIA; MOTION;
D O I
10.1785/0220200207
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
With the strong 26 November 2019 earthquake that struck western Albania, several buildings collapsed, causing 51 casualties, mainly in the areas of Durres and Thumane. The destruction is attributed to several factors, including strong ground motion (maximum peak ground acceleration =192 cm/s(2) in Durres), soil liquefaction, site amplification, poor building workmanship and construction quality, aging of building materials, impact on buildings of the strong 21 September 2019 M-w 5.6 foreshock, and pre-existing stress on buildings sustaining differential displacements because of soft soil conditions in their foundations. In both areas, we estimated maximum seismic intensity of VIII-IX (modified Mercalli intensity and European Macroseismic Scale 1998 scales). Fault-plane solutions indicated reverse faulting striking northwest-southeast. From regional tectonics, we assumed that the causal fault dips to east-northeast, implying that the affected area is situated at the hanging wall domain of the causative fault. Using the Non-Linear Location program algorithm and ak135 velocity model and 71 P and S phases, we manually located the mainshock hypocenter offshore, at distance of similar to 17 km from Durres and at depth of similar to 22 km. Adopting this solution, a finite-fault model of space-time seismic slip was developed from the inversion of teleseismic P waveforms. Strike 345 degrees, dip 22 degrees, rupture velocity 2.6 km/s, and total rupture duration similar to 16 s fit the data. The rupture was complex, showing one main patch at the south and a second at the north with maximum slips of similar to 1.5 and similar to 1 m, respectively. The rake vector at the main slip area was 99 degrees, indicating that the thrust-type component played the most important role in the rupture process. The total seismic moment released was estimated at M-o = 5.0 x 10(18) N.m corresponding to M-w 6.4.
引用
收藏
页码:3129 / 3138
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Liquefaction effects in the 2020 Mw 6.4 Petrinja, Croatia, earthquake
    Mijic, Zorana
    Zlatovic, Sonja
    Montgomery, Jack
    Ziotopoulou, Katerina
    Gjetvaj, Verica
    SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2025, 193
  • [42] The 12 October 2021, MW=6.4, Zakros, Crete earthquake
    Lentas, Konstantinos
    Gkarlaouni, Charikleia
    Kalligeris, Nikos
    Melis, Nikolaos S.
    JOURNAL OF SEISMOLOGY, 2024, 28 (01) : 39 - 61
  • [43] Geodetic Source Modeling of the 2019 Mw 6.3 Durres, Albania, Earthquake: Partial Rupture of a Blind Reverse Fault
    Govorcin, M.
    Wdowinski, S.
    Matos, B.
    Funning, G. J.
    GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2020, 47 (22)
  • [44] The 2019 Mw 6.4 and Mw 7.1 Ridgecrest earthquake sequence in Eastern California: rupture on a conjugate fault structure revealed by GPS and InSAR measurements
    Li, Shuiping
    Chen, Gang
    Tao, Tingye
    He, Ping
    Ding, Kaihua
    Zou, Rong
    Li, Jingwei
    Wang, Qi
    GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 221 (03) : 1651 - 1666
  • [45] Investigation of seismic performance of a premodern RC building typology after November 26, 2019 earthquake
    Leti, Marsed
    Bilgin, Huseyin
    STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING AND MECHANICS, 2024, 89 (05) : 491 - 505
  • [46] Using the match-and-locate method to characterize foreshocks of the July 2019 Mw6.4 Ridgecrest, California earthquake
    Liu, Min
    Zhang, Miao
    Li, Hongyi
    EARTHQUAKE SCIENCE, 2022, 35 (04) : 213 - 242
  • [47] Using the match-and-locate method to characterize foreshocks of the July 2019 MW6.4 Ridgecrest, California earthquake
    Min Liu
    Miao Zhang
    Hongyi Li
    Earthquake Science, 2022, (04) : 213 - 242
  • [48] The Largest Geodetic Coseismic Assessment of the 2020 Mw=6.4 Petrinja Earthquake
    Pavasovic, Marko
    Babic, Drago
    Banko, Antonio
    Timar, Gabor
    REMOTE SENSING, 2024, 16 (12)
  • [49] Aspects on the origin of the precursory magnetic anomalies of the Mw 6.4 Aquila earthquake
    Elizabeth Dologlou
    International Journal of Earth Sciences, 2014, 103 : 397 - 400
  • [50] Ground motion directionality in the 2018 Taiwan Hualien Mw 6.4 earthquake
    Zhao X.
    Wen Z.
    Xie J.
    Xie Q.
    Liu Y.
    Zhendong yu Chongji/Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2021, 40 (10): : 235 - 243