Angiomyolipoma with Minimal Fat: Differentiation From Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma and Papillary Renal Cell Carcinoma by Texture Analysis on CT Images

被引:83
|
作者
Yan, Lifen [1 ]
Liu, Zaiyi [1 ]
Wang, Guangyi [1 ]
Huang, Yanqi [1 ]
Liu, Yubao [1 ]
Yu, Yuanxin [1 ]
Liang, Changhong [1 ]
机构
[1] Guangdong Acad Med Sci, Guangdong Gen Hosp, Dept Radiol, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong, Peoples R China
关键词
Texture analysis; computed tomography; angiomyolipoma; renal cell carcinoma; TEXTURE ANALYSIS; HELICAL CT; PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY; HISTOGRAM ANALYSIS; VISIBLE FAT; 3.0; TESLA; LESIONS; CLASSIFICATION; DIAGNOSIS; IMAGES;
D O I
10.1016/j.acra.2015.04.004
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Rationale and Objectives: To retrospectively evaluate the diagnostic performance of texture analysis (TA) for the discrimination of angio-myolipoma (AML) with minimal fat, clear cell renal cell cancer (ccRCC), and papillary renal cell cancer (pRCC) on computed tomography (CT) images and to determine the scanning phase, which contains the strongest discriminative power. Materials and Methods: Patients with pathologically proved AMLs (n = 18) lacking visible macroscopic fat at CT and patients with pathologically proved ccRCCs (n = 18) and pRCCs (n = 14) were included. All patients underwent CT scan with three phases (precontrast phase [PCP], corticomedullary phase [CMP], and nephrographic phase [NP]). The selected images were analyzed and classified with TA software (MaZda). Texture classification was performed for 1) minimal fat AML versus ccRCC, 2) minimal fat AML versus pRCC, and 3) ccRCC versus pRCC. The classification results were arbitrarily divided into several levels according to the misclassification rates: excellent (misclassification rates <= 10%), good (10%< misclassification rates <= 20%), moderate (20%< misclassification rates <= 30%), fair (30%< misclassification rates <= 40%), and poor (misclassification rates >= 40%). Results: Excellent classification results (error of 0.00%-9.30%) were obtained with nonlinear discriminant analysis for all the three groups, no matter which phase was used. On comparison of the three scanning phases, we observed a trend toward better lesion classification with PCP for minimal fat AML versus ccRCC, CMP, and NP images for ccRCC versus pRCC and found similar discriminative power for minimal fat AML versus pRCC. Conclusions: TA might be a reliable quantitative method for the discrimination of minimal fat AML, ccRCC, and pRCC.
引用
收藏
页码:1115 / 1121
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Vascular architectural patterns in clear cell renal cell carcinoma and clear cell papillary renal cell carcinoma
    Sofia Canete-Portillo
    Maria del Carmen Rodriguez Pena
    Dezhi Wang
    Diego F. Sanchez
    George J. Netto
    Cristina Magi-Galluzzi
    [J]. Virchows Archiv, 2021, 479 : 1187 - 1196
  • [32] Difference between RAT and clear cell papillary renal cell carcinoma/clear renal cell carcinoma
    Michal Michal
    Ondrej Hes
    Naoto Kuroda
    Dmitry V. Kazakov
    Milan Hora
    [J]. Virchows Archiv, 2009, 454 : 719 - 719
  • [33] Difference between RAT and clear cell papillary renal cell carcinoma/clear renal cell carcinoma
    Michal, Michal
    Hes, Ondrej
    Kuroda, Naoto
    Kazakov, Dmitry V.
    Hora, Milan
    [J]. VIRCHOWS ARCHIV, 2009, 454 (06) : 719 - 719
  • [34] CT histogram analysis: Differentiation of angiomyolipoma without visible fat from renal cell carcinoma at CT imaging
    Kim, Ji Yeon
    Kim, Jeong Kon
    Kim, Namkug
    Cho, Kyoung-Sik
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2008, 246 (02) : 472 - 479
  • [35] Machine learning-based quantitative texture analysis of CT images of small renal masses: Differentiation of angiomyolipoma without visible fat from renal cell carcinoma
    Zhichao Feng
    Pengfei Rong
    Peng Cao
    Qingyu Zhou
    Wenwei Zhu
    Zhimin Yan
    Qianyun Liu
    Wei Wang
    [J]. European Radiology, 2018, 28 : 1625 - 1633
  • [36] Angiomyolipoma with Minimal Fat: Can It Be Differentiated from Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma by Using Standard MR Techniques?
    Hindman, Nicole
    Ngo, Long
    Genega, Elizabeth M.
    Melamed, Jonathan
    Wei, Jesse
    Braza, Julia M.
    Rofsky, Neil M.
    Pedrosa, Ivan
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2012, 265 (02) : 468 - 477
  • [37] Machine learning-based quantitative texture analysis of CT images of small renal masses: Differentiation of angiomyolipoma without visible fat from renal cell carcinoma
    Feng, Zhichao
    Rong, Pengfei
    Cao, Peng
    Zhou, Qingyu
    Zhu, Wenwei
    Yan, Zhimin
    Liu, Qianyun
    Wang, Wei
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2018, 28 (04) : 1625 - 1633
  • [38] Differentiation of Angiomyolipoma With Minimal Fat from Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma Using Non-contrast Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Jomoto, Wataru
    Takaki, Haruyuki
    Yamamoto, Shingo
    Kanematsu, Akihiro
    Igeta, Masataka
    Hirota, Seiichi
    Yamakado, Koichiro
    [J]. IN VIVO, 2022, 36 (06): : 2790 - 2799
  • [39] DIFFUSION WEIGHTED IMAGING: DIFFERENTIATION OF CLEAR CELL FROM PAPILLARY RENAL CELL CARCINOMA
    Mimromen, Seyedeh Mojdeh
    Nikpanah, Moozhan
    Gautam, Rabindra
    Metwalli, Adam
    Pourmorteza, Amir
    Linehan, William
    Malayeri, Ashkan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 197 (04): : E224 - E225
  • [40] Re: Can Quantitative CT Texture Analysis be Used to Differentiate Fat-Poor Renal Angiomyolipoma from Renal Cell Carcinoma on Unenhanced CT Images?
    Siegel, Cary
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 196 (06): : 1636 - 1636