Screening Part 19 of a Series on Evaluation of Scientific Publications

被引:20
|
作者
Spix, Claudia [1 ]
Blettner, Maria [1 ]
机构
[1] Johannes Gutenberg Univ Mainz, Univ Med, IMBEI, Deutsch Kinderkrebsregister,Univ Med Ctr, D-55101 Mainz, Germany
来源
DEUTSCHES ARZTEBLATT INTERNATIONAL | 2012年 / 109卷 / 21期
关键词
BREAST-CANCER; MAMMOGRAPHY; COLONOSCOPY; MORTALITY; COHORT; TESTS; RISK;
D O I
10.3238/arztebl.2012.0385
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: The early detection of cancer and other diseases is generally considered beneficial, yet there is evidence that in some diseases screening may be of limited benefit. To clarify this issue, we present the statistical principles that underlie screening. Methods: We define screening and discuss the conditions for its successful use. We give illustrative examples from among the currently recommended types of screening in Germany and from the recent medical literature, particularly with regard to mammography. Results: Certain specific conditions must be fulfilled for screening to be beneficial (usually measured by reduced mortality): The screening procedure must be of high quality, and the screening intervals must be well adapted to the distribution of the sojourn time. Alongside its benefits, screening can also cause harm, particularly to the many patients who are given a false positive test result. According to German law, potential participants are entitled to being given all information necessary to make an informed decision about screening. Conclusion: Just like clinical interventions, screening programs should be evaluated before they are introduced or, at the latest, at the time of their introduction.
引用
收藏
页码:385 / U17
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Anomalous diffusion in the citation time series of scientific publications
    Zamani, Maryam
    Aghion, Erez
    Pollner, Peter
    Vicsek, Tamas
    Kantz, Holger
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHYSICS-COMPLEXITY, 2021, 2 (03):
  • [32] The evaluation of scientific publications in Spain: journals of History
    del Val Valdivieso, Ma Isabel
    [J]. MELANGES DE LA CASA DE VELAZQUEZ, 2014, 44 (02): : 307 - 311
  • [33] The place of scientific publications in the evaluation of a clinical success
    Bouchard, P
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 1996, 67 (04) : 461 - 461
  • [34] DISTRIBUTION OF PUBLICATIONS AS AN INDICATOR FOR THE EVALUATION OF SCIENTIFIC PROGRAMS
    PARTHEY, H
    SCHUETZE, W
    [J]. SCIENTOMETRICS, 1991, 21 (03) : 459 - 464
  • [35] Research evaluation and scientific publications: Quantity or quality?
    Fischer, A.
    [J]. BULLETIN DE L ACADEMIE NATIONALE DE MEDECINE, 2022, 206 (07): : 898 - 901
  • [36] EVALUATION OF SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATIONS AND PROFESSIONAL LIFE OF A SCIENTIST
    Reverter Masia, J.
    [J]. NUTRICION HOSPITALARIA, 2012, 27 (04) : 1368 - 1369
  • [37] Integration of Tools for the Evaluation of Indicators of Scientific Publications
    Gonzalez-Sanabria, Juan -Sebastian
    Verdu, Elena
    Blanco-Valencia, Xiomara-Patricia
    Herrera-Melo, Camila-Andrea
    Serna-Vargas, Julian-Camilo
    [J]. REVISTA CIENTIFICA, 2023, 48 (03): : 15 - 26
  • [38] Orthopedics and COVID-19: Scientific Publications Rush
    D'Ambrosi, Riccardo
    [J]. INDIAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS, 2020, 54 (SUPPL 2) : 343 - 349
  • [39] Orthopedics and COVID-19: Scientific Publications Rush
    Riccardo D’Ambrosi
    [J]. Indian Journal of Orthopaedics, 2020, 54 : 343 - 349
  • [40] Covid-19 scientific publications from Turkey
    Ciftciler, Rafiye
    Haznedaroglu, Ibrahim C.
    Tufan, Abdurrahman
    Ozturk, Mehmet Akif
    [J]. TURKISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2021, 51 (03) : 877 - 889