Analysis of false-negative findings of breast cancer on previous magnetic resonance imaging

被引:0
|
作者
Kim, Young Eun [1 ]
Cha, Joo Hee [1 ]
Kim, Hak Hee [1 ]
Shin, Hee Jung [1 ]
Chae, Eun Young [1 ]
Choi, Woo Jung [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ulsan, Res Inst Radiol, Dept Radiol, Coll Med,Asan Med Ctr, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
Breast cancer; breast neoplasm; magnetic resonance imaging; BACKGROUND PARENCHYMAL ENHANCEMENT; MR; ULTRASOUND; WOMEN; RISK;
D O I
10.1177/0284185120941830
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background Despite the excellent contribution of contrast-enhanced breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), there are variable false-negative cases on MRI. Purpose To evaluate the false-negative findings of breast cancer on previous MRI. Material and Methods Between 2012 and 2016, we collected 132 patients who underwent surgery for a second primary cancer and had both current and previous MRI at an interval of <3 years. We included 45 patients; we excluded 38 patients who could not find a second cancer in the previous MRI and 49 patients who had a second cancer near to the original cancer and within within the same quadrant. Compared with current MRI, we retrospectively assessed the second primary cancer on previous MRI according to BI-RADS and analyzed the reasons of misinterpretation. Results Analysis of previous MRI revealed 26 (57.8%) masses (mean size 7.7 +/- 2.25 mm), 12 (26.7%) non-mass enhancements (mean size 14.7 +/- 4.76 mm), and 7 (15.5%) foci. At first reading, 24 (53.3%) were missed, 17 (37.8%) were assessed as BI-RADS category 2 or 3, and 4 (8.9%) were assessed as category 4. On current MRI, 39 (86.7%) lesions showed an increase in size and 22 (48.9%) showed a change in kinetics to wash-out pattern. Conclusion On previous MRI, missed or misinterpreted cancers show variable findings of mass and non-mass enhancements with any types of kinetics. Careful application of BI-RADS is necessary as well as an appropriate biopsy. Any lesion that increases in size and changes in kinetics should not be underestimated.
引用
收藏
页码:722 / 734
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Associations Between Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings and Clincopathologic Factors in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
    Choi, Bo Bae
    Kim, Sung Hun
    Youn, InKyung
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2019, 43 (02) : 252 - 256
  • [42] FALSE-POSITIVE AND FALSE-NEGATIVE FINDINGS ON CHORIONIC VILLUS SAMPLING
    SIMONI, G
    FRACCARO, M
    GIMELLI, G
    MAGGI, F
    BRICARELLI, FD
    PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 1987, 7 (09) : 671 - 672
  • [43] False-Negative Review from the Mammography Audit: Refining Breast Imaging Practice
    Garrett, Heather V.
    Brodsky, Jennie E.
    Ahmad, Tabassum
    Doherty, Christina M.
    Lee, Michelle V.
    Mcfarland, Elizabeth
    Bennett, Debbie L.
    RADIOGRAPHICS, 2025, 45 (02)
  • [44] FALSE-POSITIVE AND FALSE-NEGATIVE FINDINGS ON CHORIONIC VILLUS SAMPLING
    HUNTER, A
    PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 1988, 8 (06) : 475 - 475
  • [45] FALSE-NEGATIVE MR IMAGING OF AN ACOUSTIC NEURINOMA
    BARKOVICH, AJ
    WIPPOLD, FJ
    BRAMMER, RE
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEURORADIOLOGY, 1986, 7 (02) : 363 - 364
  • [46] CONFOCAL MICROSCOPY OF FALSE-NEGATIVE BREAST ASPIRATES
    BOON, ME
    SCHUT, JJ
    SUURMEIJER, AJH
    BENITA, EM
    HUT, PKH
    KOK, LP
    DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, 1995, 12 (01) : 42 - 50
  • [47] ANALYSIS OF FALSE-NEGATIVE CANCER CASES IDENTIFIED WITH A MAMMOGRAPHIC AUDIT
    GANOTT, MA
    HARRIS, KM
    KLAMAN, HM
    KEELING, TL
    RADIOLOGY, 1995, 197 : 343 - 343
  • [48] Non-sentinel lymph node status among breast cancer patients: Predictors and false-negative findings
    Kohrt, HE
    Nowels, K
    Johnson, D
    Lee, P
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2004, 122 (04) : 644 - 644
  • [49] The False-Negative Rate of Sentinel Node Biopsy in Patients with Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis
    Pesek, Sarah
    Ashikaga, Taka
    Krag, Lars Erik
    Krag, David
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2012, 36 (09) : 2239 - 2251
  • [50] The False-Negative Rate of Sentinel Node Biopsy in Patients with Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis
    Sarah Pesek
    Taka Ashikaga
    Lars Erik Krag
    David Krag
    World Journal of Surgery, 2012, 36 : 2239 - 2251