Does insiders share pledging stifle innovation? Evidence from China

被引:26
|
作者
Wang, Qiong [1 ]
Qiu, Muqing [2 ]
Tan, Wenhao [3 ]
机构
[1] Fudan Univ, Sch Management, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] East China Univ Sci & Technol, Business Sch, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[3] Nanjing Univ Finance & Econ, Accounting Sch, Nanjing, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 中国博士后科学基金;
关键词
RISK REDUCTION; AGENCY COSTS; FIRM; DIVERSIFICATION; OWNERSHIP; STOCK;
D O I
10.1016/j.irfa.2020.101570
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
We examine the relation between insiders share pledging activities for personal loans and firm innovation. Firstly, we find a negative effect of both the existence of pledging and the intensity of pledging activities on firm innovation, measured by R&D and patent application. Pledging by insiders with decision rights is associated with a 4.6% decline in R&D activities and 0.5% decline in patent applications, respectively, which accounts for 4.0% and 10.6% of the mean of each variable. This result holds using a propensity-score matched sample. In addition, we instrument pledging activities by financing constraints faced by other firms controlled by the same controlling insiders who pledge shares. IV estimation yield similar results. Secondly, we find share pledge activities have more pronounced effect on firm innovations when firms are located in areas with strong property rights protection, when firms are non-SOEs, or when pledging insiders serve on corporate boards. Lastly, we also find a negative effect of share pledging of other firms with common shareholders on firm innovations of interest. Overall, our findings suggest that pledging shares by insiders stifle firm innovation because share pledging reduce insiders' preference for risk taking.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Does six sigma stifle innovation?
    Montgomery, Douglas C.
    [J]. QUALITY AND RELIABILITY ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL, 2008, 24 (03) : 249 - 249
  • [32] Does Transparency Stifle or Facilitate Innovation?
    Brown, James R.
    Martinsson, Gustav
    [J]. MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2019, 65 (04) : 1600 - 1623
  • [33] Does air pollution decrease labor share? Evidence from China
    Zhou, Tao
    Zhang, Ning
    [J]. GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2023, 82
  • [34] Does directors' innovation experience promote firm innovation? Evidence from China
    Zhou, Jian
    Qin, Rong
    Wang, Xin
    Wang, Shunhao
    [J]. KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT RESEARCH & PRACTICE, 2023, 21 (03) : 537 - 550
  • [35] Does ownership type matter for innovation? Evidence from China
    Jiang, Ling
    Waller, David S.
    Cai, Shaohan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2013, 66 (12) : 2473 - 2478
  • [36] Does intellectual monopoly stimulate or stifle innovation?
    Chu, Angus C.
    Cozzi, Guido
    Galli, Silvia
    [J]. EUROPEAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2012, 56 (04) : 727 - 746
  • [37] Does standardization improve care or stifle innovation?
    Law, Yuk
    [J]. PEDIATRIC TRANSPLANTATION, 2017, 21 (05)
  • [38] INNOVATION Does Competition Spur or Stifle Creativity?
    Gross, Daniel P.
    [J]. HARVARD BUSINESS REVIEW, 2020, 98 (03) : 24 - 26
  • [39] Do insiders facing pledging risks make risky corporate investments? Evidence from Chinese M&As
    Tang, Qingquan
    Guo, Jingjing
    Zeng, Shiyun
    [J]. ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING & ECONOMICS, 2023, 30 (02) : 354 - 372
  • [40] Does the market-oriented environmental regulation promote firms' technological innovation? Evidence from A-share listed companies in China
    Shao, Wei
    Yang, Ke
    Chen, Ziqi
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2023,