Large Animal Models in Regenerative Medicine and Tissue Engineering: To Do or Not to Do

被引:132
|
作者
Ribitsch, Iris [1 ]
Baptista, Pedro M. [2 ]
Lange-Consiglio, Anna [3 ]
Melotti, Luca [4 ]
Patruno, Marco [4 ]
Jenner, Florien [1 ]
Schnabl-Feichter, Eva [5 ]
Dutton, Luke C. [6 ]
Connolly, David J. [5 ]
van Steenbeek, Frank G. [7 ]
Dudhia, Jayesh [6 ]
Penning, Louis C. [7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Vet Med Vienna, Univ Equine Hosp, Dept Compan Anim & Horses, Veterm, Vienna, Austria
[2] Hlth Res Inst Aragon IIS Aragon, Lab Organ Bioengn & Regenerat Med, Zaragoza, Spain
[3] Univ Milan, Dept Vet Med, Milan, Italy
[4] Univ Padua, Dept Comparat Biomed & Food Sci, Padua, Italy
[5] Univ Vet Med Vienna, Dept Compan Anim & Horses, Clin Unit Small Anim Surg, Vienna, Austria
[6] Royal Vet Coll, Dept Clin Sci & Serv, Brookmans Pk, Herts, England
[7] Univ Utrecht, Fac Vet Med, Dept Clin Sci Compan Anim, Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
large animal models; sheep; pig; horse; dog; regenerative medicine; tissue engineering; naturally occurring disease; MESENCHYMAL STEM-CELLS; DIGITAL FLEXOR TENDON; CARDIOSPHERE-DERIVED CELLS; REGIONAL LIMB PERFUSION; TOXICOSIS GENE MURR1; RIGHT-VENTRICULAR CARDIOMYOPATHY; PERIPHERAL-NERVE REGENERATION; ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT; MULTIPOTENT STROMAL CELLS; GENETICALLY-MODIFIED PIGS;
D O I
10.3389/fbioe.2020.00972
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Rapid developments in Regenerative Medicine and Tissue Engineering has witnessed an increasing drive toward clinical translation of breakthrough technologies. However, the progression of promising preclinical data to achieve successful clinical market authorisation remains a bottleneck. One hurdle for progress to the clinic is the transition from small animal research to advanced preclinical studies in large animals to test safety and efficacy of products. Notwithstanding this, to draw meaningful and reliable conclusions from animal experiments it is critical that the species and disease model of choice is relevant to answer the research question as well as the clinical problem. Selecting the most appropriate animal model requires in-depth knowledge of specific species and breeds to ascertain the adequacy of the model and outcome measures that closely mirror the clinical situation. Traditional reductionist approaches in animal experiments, which often do not sufficiently reflect the studied disease, are still the norm and can result in a disconnect in outcomes observed between animal studies and clinical trials. To address these concerns a reconsideration in approach will be required. This should include a stepwise approach usingin vitro and ex vivoexperiments as well asin silicomodeling to minimize the need forin vivostudies for screening and early development studies, followed by large animal models which more closely resemble human disease. Naturally occurring, or spontaneous diseases in large animals remain a largely untapped resource, and given the similarities in pathophysiology to humans they not only allow for studying new treatment strategies but also disease etiology and prevention. Naturally occurring disease models, particularly for longer lived large animal species, allow for studying disorders at an age when the disease is most prevalent. As these diseases are usually also a concern in the chosen veterinary species they would be beneficiaries of newly developed therapies. Improved awareness of the progress in animal models is mutually beneficial for animals, researchers, human and veterinary patients. In this overview we describe advantages and disadvantages of various animal models including domesticated and companion animals used in regenerative medicine and tissue engineering to provide an informed choice of disease-relevant animal models.
引用
收藏
页数:28
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Smart Hydrogels in Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
    Mantha, Somasundar
    Pillai, Sangeeth
    Khayambashi, Parisa
    Upadhyay, Akshaya
    Zhang, Yuli
    Tao, Owen
    Pham, Hieu M.
    Tran, Simon D.
    [J]. MATERIALS, 2019, 12 (20)
  • [42] Perspectives and Challenges in Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
    Langer, Robert
    [J]. ADVANCED MATERIALS, 2009, 21 (32-33) : 3235 - 3236
  • [43] Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine in musculoskeletal oncology
    Boris Michael Holzapfel
    Ferdinand Wagner
    Laure Christine Martine
    Stephan Reppenhagen
    Maximilian Rudert
    Michael Schuetz
    Jim Denham
    Jan-Thorsten Schantz
    Dietmar Werner Hutmacher
    [J]. Cancer and Metastasis Reviews, 2016, 35 : 475 - 487
  • [44] Bioimaging and nanomedicine in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine
    Choi, Hak Soo
    [J]. TISSUE ENGINEERING PART A, 2022, 28 : 119 - 119
  • [45] Amniotic membrane in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine
    Kreft, Mateja Erdani
    Dragin, Urska
    [J]. ZDRAVNISKI VESTNIK-SLOVENIAN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2010, 79 (10): : 707 - 715
  • [46] Chitosan involved tissue engineering and regenerative medicine
    Olteanu, Camelia Elena
    Enescu, Daniela
    [J]. ROMANIAN BIOTECHNOLOGICAL LETTERS, 2007, 12 (03): : 3217 - 3233
  • [47] Use of nanoparticles in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine
    Fathi-Achachelouei M.
    Knopf-Marques H.
    Ribeiro da Silva C.E.
    Barthès J.
    Bat E.
    Tezcaner A.
    Vrana N.E.
    [J]. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, 2019, 7 (MAY)
  • [48] Additive Biomanufacturing in Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
    Hutmacher, D.
    [J]. TISSUE ENGINEERING PART A, 2015, 21 : S4 - S4
  • [49] Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine in the Field of Otorhinolaryngology
    Oh, Se-Young
    Kim, Ha Yeong
    Jung, Soo Yeon
    Kim, Han Su
    [J]. TISSUE ENGINEERING AND REGENERATIVE MEDICINE, 2024, 21 (07) : 969 - 984
  • [50] Education for careers in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine
    Griffith, L
    Swartz, M
    Tranquillo, R
    [J]. ANNALS OF BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2006, 34 (02) : 265 - 269