Quantification and valuation of ecosystem services in life cycle assessment: Application of the cascade framework to rice farming systems

被引:26
|
作者
Liu, Xinyu [1 ]
Bakshi, Bhavik R. [1 ]
Rugani, Benedetto [2 ]
de Souza, Danielle Maia [3 ]
Bare, Jane [4 ]
Johnston, John M. [5 ]
Laurent, Alexis [6 ]
Verones, Francesca [7 ]
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, William G Lowrie Dept Chem & Biomol Engn, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[2] Luxembourg Inst Sci & Technol LIST, Environm Res & Innovat ERIN Dept, Luxembourg, Luxembourg
[3] Univ Quebec Montreal UQAM, Dept Strategie Responsabilite Sociale & Environm, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[4] US Environm Protect Agcy US EPA, Natl Risk Management Res Lab, Off Res & Dev, Cincinnati, OH USA
[5] US Environm Protect Agcy US EPA, Natl Exposure Res Lab, Off Res & Dev, Athens, GA USA
[6] Tech Univ Denmark, Dept Technol, Quantitat Sustainabil Assessment QSA Grp, Lyngby, Denmark
[7] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol NTNU, Ind Ecol Programme, Trondheim, Norway
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Cascade model; Cause-effect chain; Ecosystem services; Life cycle assessment (LCA); Life cycle impact assessment (LCIA); Rice farming; GUIDANCE; CAPACITY; YIELD; WATER;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141278
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The integration of ecosystemservice (ES) assessment with life cycle assessment (LCA) is important for developing decision support tools for environmental sustainability. A prequel study has proposed a 4-step methodology that integrates the ES cascade framework within the cause-effect chain of life cycle impact assessment (LCIA) to characterize the physical and monetary impacts on ES provisioning due to human interventions. We here follow the suggested steps in the abovementioned study, to demonstrate the first application of the integrated ES-LCIA methodology and the added value for LCA studies, using a case study of rice farming in the United States, China, and India. Four ES are considered, namely carbon sequestration, water provisioning, air quality regulation, and water quality regulation. The analysis found a net negative impact for rice farming systems in all three rice producing countries, meaning the detrimental impacts of rice farming on ES being greater than the induced benefits on ES. Compared to the price of rice sold in the market, the negative impacts represent around 2%, 6%, and 4% of the cost of 1 kg of rice from China, India, and the United States, respectively. From this case study, research gaps were identified in order to develop a fully operationalized ES-LCIA integration. With such a framework and guidance in place, practitioners can more comprehensively assess the impacts of life cycle activities on relevant ES provisioning, in both physical and monetary terms. This may in turn affect stakeholders' availability to receive such benefits from ecosystems in the long run. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Evaluating environmental impacts of contrasting pig farming systems with life cycle assessment
    Dourmad, J. Y.
    Ryschawy, J.
    Trousson, T.
    Bonneau, M.
    Gonzalez, J.
    Houwers, H. W. J.
    Hviid, M.
    Zimmer, C.
    Nguyen, T. L. T.
    Morgensen, L.
    [J]. ANIMAL, 2014, 8 (12) : 2027 - 2037
  • [42] Evaluating the impacts of different wheat farming systems through Life Cycle Assessment
    di Cristofaro, Marco
    Marino, Stefano
    Lima, Giuseppe
    Mastronardi, Luigi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2024, 436
  • [43] Integrating Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services in Life Cycle Assessment: Methodological Proposals for New Challenges
    Teixeira, Ricardo F. M.
    [J]. SDEWES: THE 8TH CONFERENCE ON SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT OF ENERGY, WATER AND ENVIRONMENT SYSTEMS, 2014, 42 : 127 - 132
  • [44] Biodiversity and ecosystem services in life cycle impact assessment - Inventory objects or impact categories?
    Callesen, Ingeborg
    [J]. ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2016, 22 : 94 - 103
  • [45] Integrated earth system dynamic modeling for life cycle impact assessment of ecosystem services
    Arbault, Damien
    Riviere, Mylene
    Rugani, Benedetto
    Benetto, Enrico
    Tiruta-Barna, Ligia
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2014, 472 : 262 - 272
  • [46] Ecosystem Services in Life Cycle Assessment while Encouraging Techno-Ecological Synergies
    Liu, Xinyu
    Bakshi, Bhavik R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY, 2019, 23 (02) : 347 - 360
  • [47] Ecosystem services in life cycle assessment - Part 2: Adaptations to regional and serviceshed information
    Liu, Xinyu
    Ziv, Guy
    Bakshi, Bhavik R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 197 : 772 - 780
  • [48] Erratum to: Dynamic life cycle assessment: framework and application to an institutional building
    William O. Collinge
    Amy E. Landis
    Alex K. Jones
    Laura A. Schaefer
    Melissa M. Bilec
    [J]. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2013, 18 (3) : 745 - 746
  • [49] Technical substitutability of recycled materials in life cycle Assessment: A comprehensive review and framework for quantification
    Garcia, Estefania Sanabria
    Huysveld, Sophie
    Nhu, Trang T.
    De Meester, Steven
    Dewulf, Jo
    [J]. WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2023, 171 : 324 - 336
  • [50] Comparative analyses of pig farming management systems using the Life Cycle Assessment method
    Makara, Agnieszka
    Kowalski, Zygmunt
    Lelek, Lukasz
    Kulczycka, Joanna
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 241