Quantification and valuation of ecosystem services in life cycle assessment: Application of the cascade framework to rice farming systems

被引:26
|
作者
Liu, Xinyu [1 ]
Bakshi, Bhavik R. [1 ]
Rugani, Benedetto [2 ]
de Souza, Danielle Maia [3 ]
Bare, Jane [4 ]
Johnston, John M. [5 ]
Laurent, Alexis [6 ]
Verones, Francesca [7 ]
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, William G Lowrie Dept Chem & Biomol Engn, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[2] Luxembourg Inst Sci & Technol LIST, Environm Res & Innovat ERIN Dept, Luxembourg, Luxembourg
[3] Univ Quebec Montreal UQAM, Dept Strategie Responsabilite Sociale & Environm, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[4] US Environm Protect Agcy US EPA, Natl Risk Management Res Lab, Off Res & Dev, Cincinnati, OH USA
[5] US Environm Protect Agcy US EPA, Natl Exposure Res Lab, Off Res & Dev, Athens, GA USA
[6] Tech Univ Denmark, Dept Technol, Quantitat Sustainabil Assessment QSA Grp, Lyngby, Denmark
[7] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol NTNU, Ind Ecol Programme, Trondheim, Norway
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Cascade model; Cause-effect chain; Ecosystem services; Life cycle assessment (LCA); Life cycle impact assessment (LCIA); Rice farming; GUIDANCE; CAPACITY; YIELD; WATER;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141278
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The integration of ecosystemservice (ES) assessment with life cycle assessment (LCA) is important for developing decision support tools for environmental sustainability. A prequel study has proposed a 4-step methodology that integrates the ES cascade framework within the cause-effect chain of life cycle impact assessment (LCIA) to characterize the physical and monetary impacts on ES provisioning due to human interventions. We here follow the suggested steps in the abovementioned study, to demonstrate the first application of the integrated ES-LCIA methodology and the added value for LCA studies, using a case study of rice farming in the United States, China, and India. Four ES are considered, namely carbon sequestration, water provisioning, air quality regulation, and water quality regulation. The analysis found a net negative impact for rice farming systems in all three rice producing countries, meaning the detrimental impacts of rice farming on ES being greater than the induced benefits on ES. Compared to the price of rice sold in the market, the negative impacts represent around 2%, 6%, and 4% of the cost of 1 kg of rice from China, India, and the United States, respectively. From this case study, research gaps were identified in order to develop a fully operationalized ES-LCIA integration. With such a framework and guidance in place, practitioners can more comprehensively assess the impacts of life cycle activities on relevant ES provisioning, in both physical and monetary terms. This may in turn affect stakeholders' availability to receive such benefits from ecosystems in the long run. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A web application to support the quantification and valuation of ecosystem services
    Broekx, Steven
    Liekens, Inge
    Peelaerts, Wim
    De Nocker, Leo
    Landuyt, Dries
    Staes, Jan
    Meire, Patrick
    Schaafsma, Marije
    Van Reeth, Wouter
    Van den Kerckhove, Olivier
    Cerulus, Tanya
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2013, 40 : 65 - 74
  • [2] A general framework for the quantification and valuation of ecosystem services of tree-based intercropping systems
    Alam, Mahbubul
    Olivier, Alain
    Paquette, Alain
    Dupras, Jerome
    Reveret, Jean-Pierre
    Messier, Christian
    [J]. AGROFORESTRY SYSTEMS, 2014, 88 (04) : 679 - 691
  • [3] A general framework for the quantification and valuation of ecosystem services of tree-based intercropping systems
    Mahbubul Alam
    Alain Olivier
    Alain Paquette
    Jérôme Dupras
    Jean-Pierre Revéret
    Christian Messier
    [J]. Agroforestry Systems, 2014, 88 : 679 - 691
  • [4] Ecosystem services in life cycle assessment - Part 1: A computational framework
    Liu, Xinyu
    Ziv, Guy
    Bakshi, Bhavik R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 197 : 314 - 322
  • [5] A framework for integrating ecosystem services as endpoint impacts in life cycle assessment
    Hardaker, Ashley
    Styles, David
    Williams, Prysor
    Chadwick, Dave
    Dandy, Norman
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2022, 370
  • [6] Ecosystem Services in Life Cycle Assessment: A novel conceptual framework for soil
    Raymundo Pavan, Ana Laura
    Ometto, Aldo Roberto
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 643 : 1337 - 1347
  • [7] Environmental sustainability of conventional and organic farming: Accounting for ecosystem services in life cycle assessment
    Boone, Lieselot
    Roldan-Ruiz, Isabel
    Van Linden, Veerle
    Muylle, Hilde
    Dewulf, Jo
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 695
  • [8] Towards integrating the ecosystem services cascade framework within the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) cause-effect methodology
    Rugani, Benedetto
    de Souza, Danielle Maia
    Weidema, Bo P.
    Bare, Jane
    Bakshi, Bhavik
    Grann, Blane
    Johnston, John M.
    Raymundo Pavan, Ana Laura
    Liu, Xinyu
    Laurent, Alexis
    Verones, Francesca
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 690 : 1284 - 1298
  • [9] Incorporating Ecosystem Services Into Life Cycle Assessment
    Bakshi, Bhavik
    Small, Mitchell J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY, 2011, 15 (04) : 477 - 478
  • [10] Including Ecosystem Services in Life Cycle Assessment: Methodology and Application to Urban Farms
    Liu, Xinyu
    Charles, Michael
    Bakshi, Bhavik R.
    [J]. 26TH CIRP CONFERENCE ON LIFE CYCLE ENGINEERING (LCE), 2019, 80 : 287 - 291