Going green together? Brownfield remediation and environmental justice

被引:29
|
作者
Eckerd, Adam [1 ]
Keeler, Andrew G. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Virginia Tech, Ctr Publ Adm & Policy, Sch Publ & Int Affairs, Alexandria, VA 22314 USA
[2] Univ N Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[3] E Carolina Univ, Greenville, NC USA
关键词
Environmental justice; Brownfield remediation; Environmental policy; Urban affairs; PROPERTY-VALUE IMPACTS; DISTRIBUTIVE POLITICS; SUPERFUND SITE; POLICY; BENEFITS; PROGRAM; RISK;
D O I
10.1007/s11077-012-9155-9
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; D035 [国家行政管理]; D523 [行政管理]; D63 [国家行政管理];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ; 1204 ; 120401 ;
摘要
Research on the location of hazardous facilities that contribute to environmental degradation indicates an unequal distribution of such sites within low socioeconomic status communities. In this paper, we contribute to research investigating whether there are similar patterns of unequal prioritization in environmental remediation, by assessing cleanup of a broader, more diverse set of contaminated sites, all brownfields that receive federal grants, with a finer level of geographic detail than previous studies. First, we set the context by assessing the characteristics of the communities in which brownfield sites are currently located. Then, we compare the likelihood and temporal prioritization of cleaning up brownfield sites based on the composition of the neighborhoods in which they are located. We find that brownfield sites are more likely to be located in both poor and predominantly minority communities, but while sites located in poor communities tend to be cleaned up relatively quickly, sites located in communities with larger minority populations tend to be cleaned up more slowly.
引用
收藏
页码:293 / 314
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条